en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4045865 Comments by StaffWriter http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/11/its-time-to-take-a-stand/#IDComment262455539 Thank you for bringing that to our attention. It has since been repaired. Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:27:52 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/11/its-time-to-take-a-stand/#IDComment262455539 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261504147 I am not so sure that most Ron Paul fans will vote for Mitt. I am not even sure that Ron Paul will not decide to run as a third party candidate. Of all those even in the mix, Paul has the organization which would put him on almost every states ballot as a third party candidate. If you are correct in your assessment, then the GOP would only succeed in making sure than in 2014 the Democrats would retake the House Republicans will go another 40 years in the back of the bus. Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:37:22 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261504147 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261500954 to the contrary, I would be willing to wager I know very well the "perceived" determination to defeat Barack Obama, but I also know very well the egos which will continue to prevent that from becoming a reality. Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:32:23 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261500954 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261499358 perhaps I should have been a little clearer, " but unlike 2008, where the democrats installed nominee beat John McCain; the GOP installed nominee will NOT beat Barack Obama." Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:29:58 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/10/romney-will-lose-against-barack-obama-republicans-dont-be-fooled/#IDComment261499358 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/06/publication-will-resume-monday-january-9-2012/#IDComment258006816 We believe Part II of Why Larry Sinclair story matters in 2012 will shine a light on Microsoft Corp. and the activitives of its employee's and the hacking into hotmail accounts. Part II will include a host of emails between Larry and Microsoft concerning the hacking of two hotmail accounts Oct 10 & 11, 2008. Sat, 7 Jan 2012 22:49:07 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2012/01/06/publication-will-resume-monday-january-9-2012/#IDComment258006816 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/31/are-there-any-companies-who-believe-in-freedom-of-the-press-the-first-amendment/#IDComment252427043 No, maybe a Buycott of those advertisers who do not allow these groups to scare them would be better. Boycotts are what the people who are trying to shut the paper up threaten their advertisers with. Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:03:49 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/31/are-there-any-companies-who-believe-in-freedom-of-the-press-the-first-amendment/#IDComment252427043 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/28/check-out-why-larry-sinclair-story-matters-in-2012/#IDComment250312189 No Larry Sinclair's story is not "inherently anti-Obama." In fact Sinclair has never once taken any position as to whether one should or should not vote for the man, but instead has held steadfast that people have the right to know the truth about him. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:08:23 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/28/check-out-why-larry-sinclair-story-matters-in-2012/#IDComment250312189 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/28/check-out-why-larry-sinclair-story-matters-in-2012/#IDComment250188691 what about you "eyesopen," you make comments about stories which haven't appeared yet claiming them to be "anti-obama" when you have no idea whether it is or isn't. Why the Larry Sinclair Story Matters in 2012 is niether pro nor anti Obama. Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:31:04 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/28/check-out-why-larry-sinclair-story-matters-in-2012/#IDComment250188691 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment247811728 regardless of whom Young chose to sleep with, he did not deserve to be killed over it. Mon, 26 Dec 2011 17:14:58 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment247811728 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/24/merry-christmas-happy-hanukkah-happy-holidays-to-all/#IDComment247193511 Perhaps you would like to give all of us at LS.Org an example of where you claim Larry has even been accused of "ripping off seniors," much less ever being arrested, charged or convicted of any such thing. Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:39:03 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/24/merry-christmas-happy-hanukkah-happy-holidays-to-all/#IDComment247193511 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment246639755 @eyesopen: neither I nor you for that matter can speak for what Larry would have you believe. What I can say is Larry has not said Barack Obama committed the murder of Donald Young. Perhaps Donald Young's mother should be given some credit for making her feelings known about her son being killed to protect Obama. In addition I do not believe you can speak for what Donald Young did or did not claim to others. In closing, Larry has not devoted the last 4 years to smearing Barack Obama, but has spent the last 4 years telling the TRUTH about Barack Obama. Merry Christmas Meemers. Sun, 25 Dec 2011 03:13:27 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment246639755 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment246368420 I believe Larry has answered your question multiple times over the past 4 years. I believe Larry has stated repeatedly that he believes Young was killed because Young could not be as easily attacked over his past as Larry was. So eyesopen, I believe your question has surely been answered. Merry Christmas Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:23:15 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment246368420 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment245802044 Bobby, which war is it that you say Obama has ended? If you are referring to the Iraq war may we suggest you research the "Status of Forces Agreement" which George W. Bush signed which called for ALL US Troops to be out by December 31, 2011. May we also suggest you research Barack Obama and Sec of State Hillary Clinton's efforts to obtain immunity from Iraq prosecution of US Troops in Obama's effort to actually leave troops in Iraq. It was only after Iraq refused to grant immunity from prosecution to troops that Obama turned and claimed he was keeping his campaign promise. Lets at least be honest and factual before we make claims that are so easily proven false. Merry Christmas Sat, 24 Dec 2011 00:23:49 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment245802044 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment245709017 eyesopen, perhaps you should look to Larry's past answers to this question. In addition if you think that ignoring a known relationship between two men when one turns up murdered is even close to being proper or normal then you have been living in Washington, DC area far too long. As a reminder Larry has answered your question repeatedly over the last 4 years the same way every time: Donald Young could be smeared on the Internet as easily as Larry was. Merry Christmas, and we hope you keep the Young family in your prayers as they deal with the 4th anniversary of his death without any closure at all. Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:39:18 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/23/it-was-four-years-today-that-obama-friendlover-was-murdered/#IDComment245709017 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/22/new-hampshire-herald/#IDComment245151045 Don't think so AXe, Larry answered questions exactly as he has for the past 4 years. Honestly and the same. We did note before even answering the questions that the domain is registered in Melbourne. Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:00:42 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/22/new-hampshire-herald/#IDComment245151045 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/01/cains-newest-embarrassing-contradictions/#IDComment231742705 KCfield: Larry is not the one who wrote the above article, and Larry as well as the rest of us at LS.org are willing to give Cain the benefit of the doubt. You are wrong however in saying Cain has not contradicted himself once. Words matter, and the choice of your words in situations like this matter even more. Mr. Cain has had some of the worst advisers one could have in a situation like this. For Cain to go on Hannity and make statements about how "my wife still loves me and has forgiven me..." just to give an example does not bode well for Cain. Mr. Cain has to stop making statements only to contradict them a few hours later. Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:28:08 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/12/01/cains-newest-embarrassing-contradictions/#IDComment231742705 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/11/30/herman-cainwhy-not-release-your-cell-phone-records/#IDComment231156467 Pinky Lee: we are far from being part of the "liberal" base you refer to. The above article only points out that Mr. Cain has access to the phone call & text records he & his attorney have requested from Ms. White. Mr. Cain is the one who on National Television said the time frame of the calls/Texts has to be looked at. Herman Cain canrelease his own phone records in establishing a "time frame" and he can do so immediately since he has the records himself. It was Mr. Cain, not anyone at LS.org who told Niel Cavuto he wanted access to the phone records (the same records Cain himself should have from his own cell phone provider.) Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:19:06 +0000 http://www.lsnewsgroup.com/2011/11/30/herman-cainwhy-not-release-your-cell-phone-records/#IDComment231156467