<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/951817</link>
		<description>Comments by Squishy_</description>
<item>
<title>Big Peace : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305878518</link>
<description>My thoughts and prayers go out to the Breitbart family.  Mr. Breitbart will be sorely missed. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305878518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Muslim Judge: &#039;The First Amendment Does Not Allow a Person to Piss Off Another Person or Culture&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/sfr/2012/02/25/muslim-judge-the-first-amendment-does-not-allow-a-person-to-piss-off-another-person-or-culture/#IDComment302128238</link>
<description>Dear god!  Tell me that was sarcasm!  Otherwise that may just be the most absurd thing I have read today. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/sfr/2012/02/25/muslim-judge-the-first-amendment-does-not-allow-a-person-to-piss-off-another-person-or-culture/#IDComment302128238</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Congress Passes Bill Opening U.S. Skies To Drones</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2012/02/07/congress-passes-bill-opening-u-s-skies-to-drones/#IDComment287110535</link>
<description>Much like experimental aircraft &amp;amp; ultralights.  Not only is there no pilot, but the controller does not even need to know how to fly anything more complex than a paper airplane.  But hey, at least the gov&amp;#039;t can start taxing and regulationg the sale and use of R/C planes now, as long as they can deem them &amp;quot;unnmanned aircraft&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/nmachiavelli/2012/02/07/congress-passes-bill-opening-u-s-skies-to-drones/#IDComment287110535</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : WND&#039;s &#039;Birther&#039; Case Against Rubio Relies on Repealed Slavery Law</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/06/wnds-birther-case-against-rubio-relies-on-repealed-slavery-law/#IDComment285708059</link>
<description>So by that logic, I am not a &amp;quot;Natural Born Citizen&amp;quot; because, although my mother is a US citizen, my father is not.  I think you may be interpreting that a little too narrowly. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jsshapiro/2012/02/06/wnds-birther-case-against-rubio-relies-on-repealed-slavery-law/#IDComment285708059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : There Are Two Sides to Every Debate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/02/there-are-two-sides-to-every-debate/#IDComment282905744</link>
<description>I think its one of those trashy &amp;quot;reality&amp;quot; shows on Bravo or E!, along the lies of &amp;quot;Toddlers &amp;amp; Tiaras.&amp;quot;  I know I&amp;#039;ve seen commercials for it and just shaken my head. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/02/there-are-two-sides-to-every-debate/#IDComment282905744</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : There Are Two Sides to Every Debate</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/02/there-are-two-sides-to-every-debate/#IDComment282494148</link>
<description>You are not alone my friend.  But having &amp;quot;Dance Moms&amp;quot; on the list was pretty funny :) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 04:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tobytoons/2012/02/02/there-are-two-sides-to-every-debate/#IDComment282494148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Your Obama Apologist of the Day: Will Ferrell</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/26/your-obama-apologist-of-the-day-will-ferrell/#IDComment275401925</link>
<description>Will Ferrell is a DB anyway.  Perhaps if I could make it thru more than 5 minutes of one of his movies I would give a crap what he says, but I can&amp;#039;t so I don&amp;#039;t :) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/26/your-obama-apologist-of-the-day-will-ferrell/#IDComment275401925</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Stockholm Syndrome Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/24/tuesday-open-thread-stockholm-syndrome-edition/#IDComment273047721</link>
<description>I had the same problem, thought I just hadn&amp;#039;t had enough coffee yet :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/24/tuesday-open-thread-stockholm-syndrome-edition/#IDComment273047721</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Facts Aren&#039;t Racist: Appeal of Gingrich Media Attacks Summed Up with &#039;Food&#039; and &#039;Stamps&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/23/facts-arent-racist-appeal-of-gingrich-media-attacks-is-summed-up-with-food-and-stamps/#IDComment272548546</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s the problem:  Newt has warts.  Newt is honest about his warts.  Newt has not kept his skeletons in the closet where the MSM thinks they belong.  With all those warts and skeletons and warty skeletons out in the open the MSM has nothing legitimate with which to attack Newt.  Bugger.  Must suck to be them. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/23/facts-arent-racist-appeal-of-gingrich-media-attacks-is-summed-up-with-food-and-stamps/#IDComment272548546</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : False Racism Charges Mean Newt&#039;s the Frontrunner</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/22/false-racism-charges-mean-newts-the-frontrunner/#IDComment271312380</link>
<description>As ususal, calling everyone a racist is the best the MSM can do, it saves them all that energy they might put into REAL journalism.  Black, white, purple, I&amp;#039;ll be voting for whoever is NOT 0bama.  Even if it&amp;#039;s Romney. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/22/false-racism-charges-mean-newts-the-frontrunner/#IDComment271312380</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : UI: Relevant</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/hudandmay/2012/01/20/ui-relevant/#IDComment270057315</link>
<description>Whelp, that pretty well sums it up. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/hudandmay/2012/01/20/ui-relevant/#IDComment270057315</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sound Bite For The Day: Chris Matthews: &#039;Juan Williams Name Is Racist&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/17/sound-bite-for-the-day-chris-matthews-juan-williams-name-is-racist/#IDComment267739699</link>
<description>Blah, blah, blah, RACIST, blah, blah, blah, RACIST!!!! Are you kidding me???  Chris Matthews is the biggest racist out there!!! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/01/17/sound-bite-for-the-day-chris-matthews-juan-williams-name-is-racist/#IDComment267739699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Push Debunked Romney &#039;Shoe Shine&#039; Story </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/01/16/progressives-push-debunked-romney-shoe-shine-story/#IDComment266455631</link>
<description>Ayup, only someone who has never: a) had their shoes shined, or b) never had to shine a shoe would think that is a shoe shine.  But then again, ever seen a shiny pair of Birkenstocks? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2012/01/16/progressives-push-debunked-romney-shoe-shine-story/#IDComment266455631</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama Tries to Reassure Pentagon on Defense Cuts</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256894085</link>
<description>Last time a &amp;quot;career General&amp;quot; spoke up he got his CENTCOM command taken away from him.  At least they are smart enough to learn from each other&amp;#039;s mistakes. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256894085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama Tries to Reassure Pentagon on Defense Cuts</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256893025</link>
<description>I feel bad for the Commanders, First Sergeants, and Flight Chiefs who have to &amp;quot;get on board&amp;quot; with this and explain the elusive &amp;quot;bigger picture&amp;quot;.  So glad I don&amp;#039;t have to play that game anymore. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256893025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Obama Tries to Reassure Pentagon on Defense Cuts</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256825773</link>
<description>Here we go again.  I&amp;#039;m sure I&amp;#039;m not the only one who has seen this goat rope before.  Last time they pulled this crap we lost our Junior NCO corps, then promoted bunch of green kids into leadership roles and handed out ridiculous enlistment/reenlistment bonuses.  And that is really just the tip of the iceberg.  This is a really bad and wickedly stupid idea. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2012/01/05/obama-tries-to-reassure-pentagon-on-defense-cuts/#IDComment256825773</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The Daily Mail Has No Idea What An iPad Is, Attacks Bachmann</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/12/31/the-daily-mail-has-no-idea-what-an-ipad-is-attacks-bachmann/#IDComment252297150</link>
<description>OMG!!!  This is almost as bad as Palin writing notes on her hand!!  Oh the humanity!!! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2012 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/12/31/the-daily-mail-has-no-idea-what-an-ipad-is-attacks-bachmann/#IDComment252297150</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : &#039;An Election Year Dawns&#039; Without Keith Olbermann, No One Cares</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/30/an-election-year-dawns-without-keith-olbermann-no-one-cares/#IDComment251091345</link>
<description>Nope, just passed into Oblivion :) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/30/an-election-year-dawns-without-keith-olbermann-no-one-cares/#IDComment251091345</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : &#039;An Election Year Dawns&#039; Without Keith Olbermann, No One Cares</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/30/an-election-year-dawns-without-keith-olbermann-no-one-cares/#IDComment251090939</link>
<description>I care.  I care a lot...that there is one less snivelling little weasel to listen to.  Now, if we can just get Nasty Pelosi &amp;amp; Harry Reed to follow suit.  Letterman too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2011/12/30/an-election-year-dawns-without-keith-olbermann-no-one-cares/#IDComment251090939</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Court Decision on Military Uniforms in Porn Picks Away at Order and Discipline</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/12/07/court-decision-on-military-uniforms-in-porn-picks-away-at-order-and-discipline/#IDComment234345403</link>
<description>In the Air Force, Airmen could wear uniform items in civilian clothes, but if I remember correctly, no more than 2 items at a time, ie trousers and boots, blouse and trousers, etc.  Now in this case, I think the USMC, or any other branch, would be hard pressed to enforce a ruling banning the wear of uniform items in adult movies, as so many uniform items are available to the public, through online vendors and &amp;quot;surplus&amp;quot; stores.  That being said, I think its pretty stupid to make a porn flick in your uniform. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/phair/2011/12/07/court-decision-on-military-uniforms-in-porn-picks-away-at-order-and-discipline/#IDComment234345403</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>