<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/593099</link>
		<description>Comments by Ian</description>
<item>
<title>The FAA Follies : Hiatus</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1444#IDComment32820039</link>
<description>I look forward to reading the Follies Everyday, even when there&amp;#039;s nothing new, because t seems there&amp;#039;s always someone who has left a new comment. I know a lot of the fodder for a lot of posts was the non-tract, and assorted other issues, but hey - this is the FAA. They&amp;#039;re gonna screw something else up, just wait 5 minutes. I know there are Follies readers out there with somethig to say, maybe they&amp;#039;ll actually speak up and write something to post? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1444#IDComment32820039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FAA Follies : None Nine in a Million</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1434#IDComment31438755</link>
<description>I believe the report he was referencing is here: &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.errorsolutions.com\/pubs\/Examining%20ATC%20Operational%20Errors%20Using%20the%20Human%20Factors%20Analysis%20and%20Classification%20System.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Examining ATC Operational Errors Using the Huiman Factors Analysis and Classification System&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1434#IDComment31438755</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FAA Follies : None Nine in a Million</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1434#IDComment31246300</link>
<description>Eligible: The shirt was that nice, eh? You ever have the misfortune of working with Peter Grimm? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1434#IDComment31246300</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FAA Follies : Vindication</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1432#IDComment31082520</link>
<description>I am glad to see that common sense has finally taken hold, and things can get back to normal... Let&amp;#039;s hope that NATCA can get the Inherently Governmental tag put back on ATC to try to limit the wrangling by the &amp;#039;conservative&amp;#039; to privatize one of the most important services the government provides... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1432#IDComment31082520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FAA Follies : Fair process</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1369#IDComment26756190</link>
<description>Well, if FAA Re-auth ever passes, there&amp;#039;s language there that will fix the whole mess.. Provided that language makes it through the Senate, and then the Comittee, to be re-presented to Congress and Senate... I know our forefathers designed our government to move slowly, but this is getting rediculous. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Jul 2009 05:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1369#IDComment26756190</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>