<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/745002</link>
		<description>Comments by Skinny Dipper</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Layton&#039;s against the old games. It&#039;s a new one now.</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/laytons-against-the-old-games-its-a-new-one-now/#IDComment148422814</link>
<description>While Layton ran a well focused campaign on all things for seniors, his party&amp;#039;s performance in the House of Commons was sometimes all over the place.  Either Layton will need to become more focused, or the NDP will need a new leader who may get the party on an organized track to forming the next government. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 11:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/laytons-against-the-old-games-its-a-new-one-now/#IDComment148422814</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Is Stephen Harper a hologram?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/is-stephen-harper-a-hologram#IDComment146940302</link>
<description>I wonder if Harper&amp;#039;s audience has been chroma-keyed onto a green background. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/is-stephen-harper-a-hologram#IDComment146940302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: The daring Mr. Harper</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-commons-the-daring-mr-harper#IDComment146667686</link>
<description>[youtube ZHHw0u6AvYw&amp;amp;NR=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHHw0u6AvYw&amp;amp;NR=1 youtube]  Cue to 3:24. I picture the alien being as Harper. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-commons-the-daring-mr-harper#IDComment146667686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: The daring Mr. Harper</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-commons-the-daring-mr-harper#IDComment146650213</link>
<description>Stephen Harper would have been better off chroma-keying his audience onto green boards placed behind him. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-commons-the-daring-mr-harper#IDComment146650213</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Loose change</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/loose-change/#IDComment146017141</link>
<description>Liberal career politicians, Current Riding, First elected federally (Min. ten years):  Larry Bagnell, Yukon (2000) Mauril B&amp;eacute;langer, Ottawa-Vanier, ON (1995 By-Election) Carolyn Bennett, St. Paul&amp;#039;s, Ontario (1997) Scott Brison, Kings-Hants, NS (1997) Gerry Byrne, Humber-St. Barbe-Baie Verte, NL (1996 By-Election) John Cannis, Scarborough Centre, ON (1993) Denis Coderre, Bourassa Quebec (1997) Irwin Cotler, Mount Royal, QC (1999 By-Election) Roger Cuzner, Cape Breton-Canso, NS (2000) St&amp;eacute;phane Dion, St. Laurent-Cartierville, QC (1996 By-Election) Arnold Wayne Easter, Malpeque, PE (1993) Mark Eyking, Sydney-Victoria, NS (2000) Raymonde Folco, Laval-Les Iles, QC (1997) Hedy Fry, Vancouver Centre, BC (1993) Ralph Edward Goodale, Wascana, SK (1974--Note: not continuous) Albina Guarnieri, Mississauga East-Cooksville, ON (1988) Marlene Jennings, Notre Dame de Grace-Lachine, QC (1997) Jim Karygiannis, Scarborough-Agincourt, ON (1988) Dominic LeBlanc, Beaus&amp;eacute;jour, NB (2000) Derek Vincent Lee, Scarborough Rouge River, ON (1988) Lawrence A. MacAulay, Cardigan, PE (1988) Gurbax Singh Malhi, Bramalea-Gore-Malton, ON (1993) Keith Martin, Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca, BC (1993) John McCallum, Markham-Unionville, ON (2000) John Norman McKay, Scarborough-Guildwood, ON (1997) Dan McTeague, Pickering-Scarborough East, ON (1993) Peter Andrew Stewart Milliken, Kingston and the Islands, ON (1988) Maria Minna, Beaches-East York, ON (1993) Shawn Murphy, Charlottetown, PE (2000) Anita Neville, Winnipeg South Centre, MB (2000) Bernard Patry, Pierrefonds-Dollard, QC (1993) Marcel Proulx, Hull-Aylmer, QC (1999 By-Election) Bob Rae, Toronto Centre, ON (1978 By-Election, not-continuous) Geoff Regan, Halifax West, NS (1993) Judy Sgro, York West, ON (1999 By-Election) Paul John Mark Szabo, Mississauga South, ON (1993) Alan Tonks, York South-Weston, ON (2000) Giuseppe (Joseph) Volpe, Eglinton-Lawrence, ON (1988) Byron Wilfert, Richmond Hill, ON (1997)  Note: Not all of these Liberal MPs are running for re-election. Does not indicate provincial or municipal elected experience. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/loose-change/#IDComment146017141</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Commies leading Traitors! A special investigation!</title>
<link>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/#IDComment145408884</link>
<description>For Canadians living in the Eastern, Atlantic, and Newfoundland time zones: play the game of Coyne.  It&amp;#039;s like some Lord-of-the-Rings/Dungeons-and-Dragons mish-mash.  Become a Fascist, Visitor, Commie, Ewok, or Hermit.  Report your progress.  This game can be played on Twitter or Facebook. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/#IDComment145408884</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Welcome to the infomercial</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/23/welcome-to-the-infomercial#IDComment145406360</link>
<description>The Harper Con supporters dutifully behave like Chinese Communist comrades.  &amp;quot;Long live Mao Ste-phen!&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/23/welcome-to-the-infomercial#IDComment145406360</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The highest compliment</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/the-highest-compliment/#IDComment145175690</link>
<description>Yesterday&amp;#039;s Conservative attack ad: &amp;quot;A vote for the Liberals is a vote for a Liberal-Bloc coalition.&amp;quot;  Today&amp;#039;s Conservative attack ad: &amp;quot;A vote for the NDP is a vote for an NDP-Bloc coalition.&amp;quot;  Tomorrow&amp;#039;s Conservative attack ad: &amp;quot;A vote for the Christian Heritage Party is a vote for a CHP-Bloc coalition.&amp;quot;  Scary! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/22/the-highest-compliment/#IDComment145175690</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Commies leading Traitors! A special investigation!</title>
<link>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/#IDComment145174891</link>
<description>Today&amp;#039;s Conservative attack ad mentions a potential NDP-Bloc coalition.  Tomorrow&amp;#039;s Conservative attack ad will likely mention a Christian Heritage Party-Bloc coalition. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://macleans.wordpress.com/2011/04/22/commies-leading-traitors-a-special-investigation/#IDComment145174891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Is Harper prepared to do a King-Byng?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/#IDComment145024885</link>
<description>Harper is the constitution.  He makes the rules.  He is Canada&amp;#039;s autocrat! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/21/is-harper-preparing-another-king-byng/#IDComment145024885</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What is the most neglected issue so far in this election campaign?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/what-issue-do-you-feel-hasnt-been-sufficiently-discussed-so-far-in-this-election-campaign#IDComment143475699</link>
<description>You can see my comment below.  I have not heard any leader actively supporting proportional representation.  While I do not expect the Conservatives to offer anything democratic, and while the Liberals do have voting reforms that include proportional representation in their platform, the NDP does.  However, I have not heard Jack Layton once mention voting reform.  If he or another major leader does not actively support proportional representation, I will NOT be voting.  It&amp;#039;s not enough for the NDP just to list support for PR on its website.  This just demonstrates that the NDP is not serious about voting reform.  I hope that the NDP or Liberals will convince me that I am wrong by SPEAKING about voting reform that includes proportional representation. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/what-issue-do-you-feel-hasnt-been-sufficiently-discussed-so-far-in-this-election-campaign#IDComment143475699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What is the most neglected issue so far in this election campaign?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/what-issue-do-you-feel-hasnt-been-sufficiently-discussed-so-far-in-this-election-campaign#IDComment143414329</link>
<description>Without any major party actively campaigning for democratic reform with proportional representation, I will most likely not be voting.  I refuse to participate in the current first-past-the-post election that is neither fair nor democratic.  I will only participate if at least one major party actively advocates for democratic reform with proportional representation.  I don&amp;#039;t expect that the Conservatives will advocate anything democratic.  While the Liberals advocate for different ways to vote such as internet voting, they do not mention anything about advocating for proportional representation.  The NDP does support proportional representation on paper.  However, I have not heard Jack Layton state verbally his active support for proportional representation.  I get the sense that he and the NDP are not serious about supporting voting reform.  The Green Party leader, Elizabeth May, ruined her democratic legitimacy as she sought to change the Green Party constitution to keep herself on as leader rather than face a required leadership review.  With no party actively supporting democratic improvements that includes voting through some form of proportional representation, I will not be voting in an autocratic selection.  I will not be voting in this federal election that is neither fair nor democratic. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/what-issue-do-you-feel-hasnt-been-sufficiently-discussed-so-far-in-this-election-campaign#IDComment143414329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : On the campaign trail with Bev Oda</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/15/on-the-campaign-trail-with-bev-oda/#IDComment143348320</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s Ms. McNotty with an ethnic in a costume! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/15/on-the-campaign-trail-with-bev-oda/#IDComment143348320</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Conservative staffer sought ethnic people in costume for photo-op </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/conservative-staffer-sought-ethnic-people-in-costume-for-photo-op/#IDComment142943013</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s an ethnic family that the Harper Cons could visit: [youtube YT1WV5_TCNE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT1WV5_TCNE youtube] </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/14/conservative-staffer-sought-ethnic-people-in-costume-for-photo-op/#IDComment142943013</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Week Two</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/09/week-two/#IDComment141691774</link>
<description>Green Party platform point:  &amp;quot;Because of the environmental burden, clothes will be verboten.&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;ll go for that! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/09/week-two/#IDComment141691774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Mr. Harper, are you on your meds?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/mr-harper-are-you-on-your-meds#IDComment140279287</link>
<description>Does that symbol with the circle and diagonal over the person on the plane mean &amp;quot;No Canadians are allowed to meet Harper?&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/mr-harper-are-you-on-your-meds#IDComment140279287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Mr. Harper, are you on your meds?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/mr-harper-are-you-on-your-meds#IDComment140278856</link>
<description>No, no, no!  Rick Mercer as prime minister would send Canada&amp;#039;s senior citizens to Siberia or worse--Saskatchewan. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/mr-harper-are-you-on-your-meds#IDComment140278856</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : That seventies platform</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/#IDComment139852683</link>
<description>Just to note: Andrew would make a very nice leader. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/#IDComment139852683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : That seventies platform</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/#IDComment139844300</link>
<description>The new CBC Voter Compass Survey:  &amp;quot;We need more national super highways.&amp;quot;  Strongly Disagree: You support Pol Pot Mildly Disagree: You support Mao Zedung Neither Agree or Disagree: You support Stalin. Mildly Agree: You support Andrew Coyne (so long as the highways are tollways). Strongly Agree: You support Adolf H.  Someone needs to make an app or webpage for this survey. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/03/that-seventies-platform/#IDComment139844300</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Mercer challenge (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/02/the-mercer-challenge-ii#IDComment139425146</link>
<description>I like Michael Ignatieff, and I am a Canadian.  I haven&amp;#039;t seen or read anything in the news indicating that Mr. Ignatieff&amp;#039;s family hates him. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Apr 2011 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/02/the-mercer-challenge-ii#IDComment139425146</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>