<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/155853</link>
		<description>Comments by SharpWatermelon</description>
<item>
<title>IAMfourzerotwo : The Original COD4 F.N.G. Mission</title>
<link>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/05/the-original-cod4-fng-mission/#IDComment5717793</link>
<description>so thats why that area is so inexplainably enormous </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/05/the-original-cod4-fng-mission/#IDComment5717793</guid>
</item><item>
<title>IAMfourzerotwo : Playtest and Inner Office War</title>
<link>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5717223</link>
<description>lol no im saying both teams cant ever be full again,  even if A comes back, now X, Y, or Z is dead so it could never go back to 3 vs 3.  sorry for all the posting, i&amp;#039;m just crazy bored at work.  and also, youre right, absolutely wont stop the game from working, just throwin out some ideas.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5717223</guid>
</item><item>
<title>IAMfourzerotwo : Playtest and Inner Office War</title>
<link>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5706733</link>
<description>lets say 3 on 3.  (Team 1) A,B,C - VS - (Team 2) X,Y,Z.  match starts and A Kills X.   Now the second team has one man down.  Z now kills A which brings back X.  Second team is now full roster and first team is one man down.  There always has to be a man out because you have an even number of players.  From the beginning of the match, once someone gets a kill, you can&amp;#039;t get back to full teams without having respawns because there arent enough people to bring everyone back. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5706733</guid>
</item><item>
<title>IAMfourzerotwo : Playtest and Inner Office War</title>
<link>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5701453</link>
<description>whoops, haha, totally forgot it was supposed to be sabotage.  we were thinking more straight elimination/death match than objective, sorry.  what we meant though was that if you put it all down, with those rules, once someones dead, you cant ever bring back everyone, there always has to be a man out.  still sounds good though. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 07:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5701453</guid>
</item><item>
<title>IAMfourzerotwo : Playtest and Inner Office War</title>
<link>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5685033</link>
<description>world-ending meteor sized fan of that idea too but my friend and i were discussing it and he pointed out the only problem is that there would never be a way to bring back the whole team, at least person would always have to be dead... so why not do it with something like a 30 second or longer respawn with enemy kills insta-spawning youre downed comrades?  you now have a choice or running and hiding while you wait for your team to come back or going in &amp;#039;guns-a-blazing&amp;#039; as he likes to say while the other team has a choice of letting you hide and bring your men back or coming after you to wipe everyone out before the timer.  then when one team has all their guys, the roles change.  he named it Tug-O-War.  honestly i wouldnt mind either, just looking foward to having something new to play.    oh and my friend with the idea said to says he&amp;#039;s in earth wind &amp;amp; centaur.  just seeing if anybody figures it out. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2008/09/04/playtest-and-inner-office-war/#IDComment5685033</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>