<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/766532</link>
		<description>Comments by SeattleMark952</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Who Won Last Night? Nomination Battle Is Still Murky </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/29/who-won-last-night-dont-az-mi/#IDComment304686271</link>
<description>Watch to see if Santorum trots out Michael Moore again on Super Tuesday, to motivate Santorum&amp;#039;s Democrat base to put him over the top. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/29/who-won-last-night-dont-az-mi/#IDComment304686271</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: I&#039;ve &#039;Fallen Short Of The Glory Of God&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302397256</link>
<description>Yes, Newt falls short.  Of being credible. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302397256</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: I&#039;ve &#039;Fallen Short Of The Glory Of God&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302297740</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s nice to see him say that.  Given his pattern of repeatedly &amp;quot;falling short&amp;quot; (as it suits him), I wonder how soon he plans his next fall? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-ive-fallen-short-of-the-glory-of-god/#IDComment302297740</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Mitt Romney, Despite Oft Professed Love of American Cars in Michigan, Drives--and Loves--His BMW </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/25/mitt-romney-despite-oft-professed-love-of-american-cars-in-michigan-drives-and-loves-his-bmw/#IDComment301793357</link>
<description>As I gradually get wealthier, I will also own various cars.  What&amp;#039;s the big deal?  Are you mad at Romney for enjoying a number of cars from being successful?  Besides, I currently own 2 Toyotas that were built in the US.  Perhaps BMW employs American workers in a similar fashion.  Not sure why so many &amp;quot;conservatives&amp;quot; are jealous of wealthy people. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/25/mitt-romney-despite-oft-professed-love-of-american-cars-in-michigan-drives-and-loves-his-bmw/#IDComment301793357</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin before resignation: I can\&#039;t take it anymore</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T3HA7G0&show_article=1#IDComment300720931</link>
<description>This clarifies why Palin walked away from her full-time responsibilities to the Alaskan citizens, and opted to be a part time media celebrity.  Much easier to pander to a conservative base on the internet and TV than to actually serve people.  I have much more respect for Govs Walker and Christy, who actually engaged the struggles of conservative leadership once they were elected. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T3HA7G0&show_article=1#IDComment300720931</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Busted on Video: Romney Camp Takes Down Hundreds of Santorum Signs; Cops Watch</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/rebelpundit/2012/02/22/busted-on-video-romney-camp-takes-down-hundreds-of-santorum-signs-cops-watch/#IDComment299295537</link>
<description>If I rented a specific place to hold my political rally, and my opponent purposely plugged the entrance (public property) with dozens of his signs (in my face), I&amp;#039;d take them down and burn them.  Its RUDE what Santorum did.  Its even more creepy that he hired a camera guy to get a &amp;quot;gotcha&amp;quot; on the people that were merely protecting their turf.  If I had a church, and some other church came in and passed out their competing flyers to my congregation, I&amp;#039;d be offended.  Santorum talks like he has Christian values, but, he sure doesn&amp;#039;t walk the walk. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/rebelpundit/2012/02/22/busted-on-video-romney-camp-takes-down-hundreds-of-santorum-signs-cops-watch/#IDComment299295537</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Newt&#039;s 2003 Blueprint for ObamaCare</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jorient/2012/02/01/newts-2003-blueprint-for-obamacare/#IDComment281317223</link>
<description>That picture of Newt reminds me of Barney Frank (with his similar frown).  Maybe the time Newt spent as an influence peddler/lobbiest for FreddieMac rubbed off on him. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 01:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jorient/2012/02/01/newts-2003-blueprint-for-obamacare/#IDComment281317223</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Robo Call Uses Soros To Go After Romney</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-robo-call-uses-soros-to-go-after-romney/#IDComment279894648</link>
<description>Wow, I thought it was revealing when Newt attacked capitalism, wealth and successful businessmen/investors.  Now we see a desperate Newt leveraging liberal powerbrokers (Soros) as campaign tools.    Stay tuned:  Next comes Obama and Wasserman Schultz promoting Newt in coming advertisements (And Newt claims to represent the Tea Party!) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-robo-call-uses-soros-to-go-after-romney/#IDComment279894648</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Palin: &#039;Enough Is Enough With Lies About Newt Gingrich&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/palin-enough-is-enough-with-the-lies-about-newt-gingrich/#IDComment279878893</link>
<description>Palin (like Newt, Cain, and Rush) knows that her gravy comes from the extreme right wing.  In fact, Palin walked away from her full-time leadership obligations to the people of  Alaska so she could make much more $$ as a part-time talking-head celebrity.  As a conservative, the only thing worse than corrupt liberal politicians are people that sprint to the front of conservative parades, shrieking with their bull-horn so they can make money off of the passionate concerns of earnest voters.  Palin may have painted herself into a corner this time. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/palin-enough-is-enough-with-the-lies-about-newt-gingrich/#IDComment279878893</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sarah:  &#039;Annoy A Liberal. Vote Newt&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-annoy-a-liberal-vote-newt/#IDComment278044379</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d rather defeat a liberal (Obama) than merely annoy one for spite&amp;#039;s sake.  Not sure why Palin has joined  the ranks of ultra-extremists in the media (that purposely incite bad feelings) unless she also wants to capitalize on the media attention, fame and related big $$.   (Come to think of it, Palin did walk away from her real world responsibilities to the citizens of Alaska--to access the easy bucks paid to full-time talking heads and speech-givers.) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sarah-annoy-a-liberal-vote-newt/#IDComment278044379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : GOP Congressman: Newt More Obnoxious Than Obama</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/gop-congressman-newt-more-obnoxious-than-obama/#IDComment276890999</link>
<description>Yeah, lets get a nominee that uses commonly recognized left wing rhetoric and arguments to attack wealth and capitalism.  As long as he has &amp;quot;sharp elbows&amp;quot;, that&amp;#039;s the important thing.  Then he can attack Obama from the left--that&amp;#039;s the strategy--sharp elbows is the key! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/gop-congressman-newt-more-obnoxious-than-obama/#IDComment276890999</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Saul Alinsky and the Romneys&#039; Progressive Activism</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/01/25/saul-alinsky-and-the-romneys-progressive-activism/#IDComment274316708</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m a conservative and I read Alinsky&amp;#039;s book to learn exactly what he taught (I prefer some research before talking).   Many conservatives leverage Alinsky teachings (as well as liberals) in cynical and selfish ways whenever it serves their purposes.  Just because George Romney might have said something open-minded about listening to Alinsky, doesn&amp;#039;t mean a whole lot.  I&amp;#039;ve seen many fake conservatives endorse Reagan to serve their purposes.  Heck, I&amp;#039;ve even seen Obama endorse Lincoln and Reagan within the last three years--but we know he is name-dropping just to raise his approval rating.  Mitt Romney knows that he must not run as a red meat conservative, otherwise, Obama will capture both the left and the center (especially among people that consider themselves &amp;quot;independents&amp;quot;).  Even if Newt were to get close to capturing the nomination, you&amp;#039;d see him immediately shut down his red meat conservative rhetoric, and start saying things that appeal to the center.  If you study Newt, you&amp;#039;ll immediately find climate-change endorsement with Nancy Pelosi, single-payer insurance mandate endorsements, and sharp criticism of Paul Ryan&amp;#039;s plan (among other things).   It&amp;#039;s not hard to put the  &amp;quot;fake conservative&amp;quot; label on most anyone--you shouldn&amp;#039;t need to dig up peripheral quotes from their ancestors. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/01/25/saul-alinsky-and-the-romneys-progressive-activism/#IDComment274316708</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : After poor debates, Perry may skip some in future</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9QKUE4O2&show_article=1#IDComment213964107</link>
<description>Perry seems like a doofus.    Probably good if he skips debates and speeches and just buys tons of campaign advertisements smearing any of the frontrunners.  Then if he wins, he can get a teleprompter like Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9QKUE4O2&show_article=1#IDComment213964107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : News channels quickly lose interest in summit</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E3GBTO0&show_article=1#IDComment58827661</link>
<description>King Obama:    &amp;quot;There&amp;#039;s an imbalance in the opening statements because I&amp;#039;m the KING of this country&amp;quot;   (Obama was actually saying).     Heaven save us from this King we&amp;#039;ve got. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E3GBTO0&show_article=1#IDComment58827661</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Obama Deploys &#039;Prompters for Primary School Appearance -- Not for the Kids, for the Media</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/01/25/not-a-photoshop-monday-pet-goat-open-thread/#IDComment53947352</link>
<description>That picture had me chuckling for an hour.  I hope the media has it handy for future laughs.  It makes BO look so stupid.  (Unfortunately, the Office of the US Presidency cannot avoid being hurt by his actions, as well.) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/mwalsh/2010/01/25/not-a-photoshop-monday-pet-goat-open-thread/#IDComment53947352</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Scott Brown Win &#039;Stunning&#039;? Only to Out-of-Touch Media</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pmeister/2010/01/20/scott-brown-win-stunning-only-to-out-of-touch-media/#IDComment53223765</link>
<description>It is especially satisfying that Scott Brown was clever enough to pick up David Gergen&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;gotcha&amp;quot; question about Ted&amp;#039;s holy senate seat and knock it out of the park with his &amp;quot;...its the People&amp;#039;s Seat!&amp;quot; response.  Its interesting as David Gergen (and others of the MSM) try to subtly tear Brown back down again as I&amp;#039;ve heard him as a talking head on TV.  It will be much more difficult for them to smear Brown like they did with Palin.  (They are already trying.) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pmeister/2010/01/20/scott-brown-win-stunning-only-to-out-of-touch-media/#IDComment53223765</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama aide says Brown ran good race for Senate</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DAVF3O2&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52954116</link>
<description>The National Democratic party (Obama level) immediately and sharply criticized Coakley, and said that she &amp;quot;failed to create a negative narrative about Brown&amp;quot;.     This certainly reveals the main Democrat party modus operandi.  I didn&amp;#039;t realized that their playbook was pure Saul Alinsky smear tactics, but that certainly is a damning admission from the Dems of what they try to do. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DAVF3O2&amp;show_article=1#IDComment52954116</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>