en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/312750 Comments by ScottiesRule http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.56ebdf0712e722f2c904a46ee1aa03d3.9c1&show_article=1#IDComment116686276 I'm with elleno....let the world know the Kiwis are on their own. In fact, I'd go one step further and actually encourage some country or organization to take possession of NZ. Given the absence of any real military force, just about anyone should be able to take them. Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:06:52 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.56ebdf0712e722f2c904a46ee1aa03d3.9c1&show_article=1#IDComment116686276 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76581763 This is one of those times when you need about a gallon of skunk scent. You fill up one of those super soaker water guns and fire away. I'm still trying to figure out how anyone can physically step on your property to protest without running the risk you could drop them where they stood with just cause. Fri, 21 May 2010 23:18:35 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/acary/2010/05/21/d-c-metro-police-escorted-seiu-protesters-to-greg-baers-home/#IDComment76581763 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CJACDG0#IDComment47178516 They talk about the glaciers in Greenland and Antartica dumping ice into the ocean. Last time I checked, glaciers only dump ice (calve) when they are growing. How can they be growing if global warming is taking place? Just wondering. Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:25:04 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CJACDG0#IDComment47178516 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99NJ8R80#IDComment28641340 What's the problem? As everyone knows, Obama was a well known constitutional scholar who could have easily been granted tenure by the prestigious University of Chicago had he so desired....before he opted to head to Washington. I'm guessing he believes the Honduran constitution, like the US Constitution, was less than perfect when created. Either that or maybe he's following the "living" document approach again. Whatever the case, he's the scholar and we aren't...so drink more kool-aid and he'll let you know what you think when he thinks you need to know what you think. Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:28:19 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D99NJ8R80#IDComment28641340 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D976C8E01#IDComment17714266 Don't forget to turn on every light you have tomorrow night to show anti-solidarity with the global warming crowd. I've seen several different "official" times...so I'll be burning kw all night. Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:56:37 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D976C8E01#IDComment17714266 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964UGBG0#IDComment14758341 That would be the $50 billion he wants to cut. Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:52:21 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D964UGBG0#IDComment14758341 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D963IFEG3#IDComment14688653 rono, The problem is Chris Dodd and his ilk do not acknowledge they have done anything wrong even after getting caught. Dodd was called out on this months ago and to this day he still does not get it. What everyone seems to fail to understand is that there are 3 sets of rules: 1. the rules we normal folks follow; 2. the rules politicians in general follow....far less onerous than those for group #1; and 3. the rule Democratic politicians follow....hardly really rules at all. Dodd, Frank, Waters, Schumer, Rangel, Conyers....the list just goes on and on. Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:30:18 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D963IFEG3#IDComment14688653 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521752 The problem is neither absolute approach works. You can't fire first and then talk peace. But, by the same token, you can't keep "talking" endlessly. At some point, you have to shut up and poke the other guy in the nose. History shows that talk, without the threat of force, literally never works. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:36:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521752 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521701 Amazing logic. You mean if Bush had simply asked Saddam Hussein to give up his evil ways and then used force it would have been OK. Wait...that's what happened. The UN passed resolution after resolution...which Saddam ignored. So, using your logic, Bush was totally justified taking out Iraq. Thanks for the assist. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:32:12 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521701 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521677 You must subscribe to the theory that if you say something often enough it will soon be taken as a fact. Why else would you keep trying to link the failing economy to Bush and not the real culprits....Frank, Dodd and a host of Congressional Dems. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:29:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521677 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521626 But if you carry the stick...you need to be willing to use it. Firing a few cruise missiles every now and then does not quite do it. The other guy has to know you are serious about using force or you are impotent. For reference, see William Jefferson Clinton. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:24:52 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521626 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521585 The point is not that Iran or Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. The point is that many in the Middle East value life much differently than those in the West. They do not think twice about setting off a bomb to kill innocent civilians. They do not think twice about hiding behind women and children...almost daring their enemy to try to fire on them. If fought battles on their terms we would simply send over a couple of nukes and glass the entire area not caring that the 97% of people caught up in the blast were completely innocent. We are not perfect but I'll take our way over their approach any day. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:20:59 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521585 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521491 The 1.2 trillion is all Mr. Obama's doing....and Ms Pelosi...and Mr. Reid. Nice try pinning on Bush. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:12:12 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521491 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521479 Right. We will do nothing, as will the rest of the world, until Iran has a nuke. Then, we will be forced to either bomb them back to the stone age or risk having that nuke go off in the US or Europoe....or Israel. How well has diplomacy worked thus far with Iran? Has it stopped their funding/support of Hamas and Hezbollah? NO. Have they scaled back their nuke program...and by that I mean their weapons program?. NO. Yes sir, I would say the diplomatic approach is working just fine. In another few years, things should be just peachy. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:10:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521479 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521418 This isn't the Bush recession/depression. Nope. This little gem is brought to you by those fine Dems in Congress, lead by Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters and Chuck Schumer...to name a few. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:05:10 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521418 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521379 With the complete backing of the Khomeini and his Mullah buddies. Sun, 1 Feb 2009 01:02:29 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14521379 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14519166 I have no problem talking with Ahmadinejad or others within the Iranian power structure....but to do so unconditionally gives them leverage and empowers them to make more outrageous demands. Anyone who has ever negotiated a contract (and that's diplomacy of a kind) knows you do not give something valuable away without getting something in return. Why? Because once you put it on the table, your leverage is gone. There is another classic negotiating adage that may also apply here. Whoever speaks first....loses. Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:01:06 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.073ba2ee2f1f00668848a4655420fedc.411#IDComment14519166