<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/268908</link>
		<description>Comments by Scott_W</description>
<item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Robo Vol 3 Issue #2 this week!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23194394</link>
<description>People who don&amp;#039;t have to draw them always say things like that. =D  Also, I figured out how to track blog comments! At the top right of the Comments section, just below the cover for 3.2, there is another RSS thing. You can select to track all comments on the blog, or all posts on the blog. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23194394</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Robo Vol 3 Issue #2 this week!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23194276</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working on a 1970&amp;#039;s LG right now. I was going to base it off a goofy phaser rifle from the original Star Trek, but now I&amp;#039;m not so sure . . . </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23194276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Robo Vol 3 Issue #2 this week!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23160641</link>
<description>I often wonder why I have to keep designing lightning guns that never get used . . . </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/06/02/robo-vol-3-issue-2-this-week/#IDComment23160641</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23055339</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;ve got some serious readin&amp;#039; there!  (Awesome pic BTW)  I also wanted to pick of Allan&amp;#039;s War, but I&amp;#039;m still a little WWII&amp;#039;ed out after Vol.2. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23055339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23055166</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s the &amp;quot;Bat-shit loco&amp;quot; thing that I&amp;#039;m not sure I will enjoy. But now I have a name (Mista Way) and I will check some issues out. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23055166</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23008544</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s what I&amp;#039;m talking about. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23008544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23008528</link>
<description>I read a Dead Pool mini a few years ago. It had something to do with Banshee&amp;#039;s daughter, the Sasquatch dude from Alpha Flight and . . .that&amp;#039;s all I remember. Oh and the story sucked. I remember that too. The art was cool. I think this was back before it was Cable &amp;amp; Dead Pool.  I need to find out how writes DP best and find a run of his work. And yeah -absolutely NO Secret Invasion please. I used to be indifferent to those big stupid &amp;quot;Events&amp;quot;, but now they actually irritate me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment23008528</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991841</link>
<description>I love Campbell&amp;#039;s work. he came up in that other discussion I&amp;#039;ve been having.   This is random, but I mentioned in that chat that i thought Campbell was gay -I&amp;#039;ve seen his name listed with gay comics, but that could just as easily be the characters in his books. Do you know if he is or not?  It&amp;#039;s not important in the end, but if he is I wonder if that is aprt of the reason why he draws women so well but his men sort of all look the same -skinny and sort of girlie (at least in the books I&amp;#039;ve read).  I almsot hesitate to ask it again in a second place. I don&amp;#039;t want to start some &amp;quot;Ross is gay&amp;quot; internet rumor. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991841</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991695</link>
<description>Har-dee-har-har. I did that.  It only tracks posts, not replies. It must have something to do with Intense Debate. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991695</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991515</link>
<description>99% of character in comics are depicted as these unattainable super-gods when it comes to their physical attributes. and that&amp;#039;s okay. It&amp;#039;s really about how they are dealt with. Its funny, but for the first time ever, while writing this it occurs to me that it&amp;#039;s not comics as an industry that&amp;#039;s sexist per-say, but rather comic book artists and to a lesser degree, comic book writers.  The editor never asks you to draw somebody so that you can see their ass and boobs in the same shot. They never say, &amp;quot;Put the camera down low so we get a great shot of this character&amp;#039;s ass&amp;quot;. They also never say, &amp;quot;Powergirl has giant boobs. Be sure to write her like an idiot, because the larger the brad the lower the I.Q.&amp;quot;  And actually, I&amp;#039;ve known of several cases where artist&amp;#039;s had to tone down the sexuality of their work I can only guess that the same has been true for some scripts.  but generally, people don&amp;#039;t call us creative types on that sort of bullshit. They are just happy we turned in some work, and overall it looks good or reads well. Hmmm . . .that&amp;#039;s really interesting. Have to think on that. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22991515</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Damnit Monday!</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22942412</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m only commenting so that I can track future comments.  In this respect this blog is stupid. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/31/damnit-monday/#IDComment22942412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Same As It Ever Was</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22426492</link>
<description>Aw it&amp;#039;s cool. It&amp;#039;s an idea we would have (and do) fully endorse.   We just wish we&amp;#039;d been asked! haha. Not your fault though. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22426492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Don&#039;t Click Through</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/26/dont-click-through/#IDComment22414687</link>
<description>I wouldn&amp;#039;t even have a clue how to paint one of those. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/26/dont-click-through/#IDComment22414687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Same As It Ever Was</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22342713</link>
<description>My website was blocked? For some reason that sounds awesome to me. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22342713</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Don&#039;t Click Through</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/26/dont-click-through/#IDComment22340619</link>
<description>Ugh, it makes me cry knowing that I can&amp;#039;t have this on my little Mighty Muggs shelf. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/26/dont-click-through/#IDComment22340619</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Same As It Ever Was</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285714</link>
<description>It looks great in Firefox on Vista. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285714</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Same As It Ever Was</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285684</link>
<description>Well I&amp;#039;m only joking of course.   But you guys have been together long enough that you might as well. Then again, if I can kill Brian before you tie the knot, I will gain full ownership of Atomic Robo, and then I can hire Benito Cerino to write it, and no one will notice the difference.  Yes. Yes I think you should wait. In fact, never get married. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Same As It Ever Was</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285549</link>
<description>I heard Red5 okayed that contest -which is funny, considering how they have zero creative control over what we do.  As Geek Syndicate has said repeatedly, we don&amp;#039;t have to use the title that wins. Though if we can we will. Probably as a B-Side story. I think they announce the winner in the next week or so. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/25/same-as-it-ever-was/#IDComment22285549</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Notes To Self - Volume Titles</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/23/notes-to-self-volume-titles/#IDComment22173229</link>
<description>You ought to throw Two-Fisted Science Tales up on the list, even though we don&amp;#039;t have a story to go with it yet. It&amp;#039;s a great titles and it would suck to forget it. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/23/notes-to-self-volume-titles/#IDComment22173229</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Atomic-Robo.com : Notes To Self - Volume Titles</title>
<link>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/23/notes-to-self-volume-titles/#IDComment22173189</link>
<description>Weeeellll . . .sort of. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 11:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.atomic-robo.com/2009/05/23/notes-to-self-volume-titles/#IDComment22173189</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>