<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/558224</link>
		<description>Comments by Scott_Tribe</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Poll projects 100 seats for NDP</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/poll-projects-100-seats-for-ndp/#IDComment146318441</link>
<description>Right. the pollster who predicted correctly FOrd would win the mayorlty of Toronto.. while others predicted a neck and neck race.. is a bad pollster.  Make no mistake.. this could be an outlier (tho his new poll he released today to see if the one yesterday was whacky reconfirms Ekos #&amp;#039;s)m but it wont be because he&amp;#039;s a Liberal shill or whatever other insult you&amp;#039;re parroting from Kory Teynecke, </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/poll-projects-100-seats-for-ndp/#IDComment146318441</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : How many people does it take to release a report?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-release-a-report/#IDComment142615697</link>
<description>Ekos has the gap between the Liberals and Cons down to 5:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/13/race-tightened-in-the-hoursprior-to-english-debate-ekos/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://ipolitics.ca/2011/04/13/race-tightened-in-...&lt;/a&gt;    </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/13/how-many-people-does-it-take-to-release-a-report/#IDComment142615697</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : John Baird&#039;s turn to explain the strategic review</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/09/john-bairds-turn-to-explain-the-strategic-review/#IDComment141556303</link>
<description>Well, this is an Ipsos-Reid poll.. so it&amp;#039;s not surprising they&amp;#039;d find a result like this.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/09/john-bairds-turn-to-explain-the-strategic-review/#IDComment141556303</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Harper&#039;s game</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/harpers-game/#IDComment139993672</link>
<description>Decima&amp;#039;s latest poll has the gap down to 7 from 14. I wouldn&amp;#039;t count on a Con majority just yet. It is still early. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/04/harpers-game/#IDComment139993672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Ignatieffalump in the room</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-ignatieffalump-in-the-room/#IDComment138978296</link>
<description>So CR.. how long does Iggy have to live in Canada now that he&amp;#039;s moved back   before he&amp;#039;s fit to govern Canada, in your mind? DOes he have to be back for 21 more years (- the 5 he has been back) before he&amp;#039;s eligible to run for PM?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Apr 2011 01:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/31/the-ignatieffalump-in-the-room/#IDComment138978296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : On second thought</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/on-second-thought-6/#IDComment138715195</link>
<description>Not long ago, Mr Genco tweeted this:   RT @TonyGenco Ppl of Vaughn, let Chief Fantino know that we don&amp;#039;t want more prisons. Fantino&amp;#039;s ways tried and failed in USA #cdnpoli #elxn41  I&amp;#039;d like to hear how he reconciles that now.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/30/on-second-thought-6/#IDComment138715195</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Coyne v. Wells on the looming election</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/23/coyne-v-wells-on-the-looming-election/#IDComment137105038</link>
<description>Wow.. Coyne vs Wells is now so big it&amp;#039;s got its own sponsor! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/23/coyne-v-wells-on-the-looming-election/#IDComment137105038</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : NDP rejects federal budget </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/ndp-rejects-federal-budget/#IDComment136872258</link>
<description>Well, speaking for me,  I&amp;#039;ve had enough of the bloody pre-writ Conservative attack ads and EAP ads and the contempt for Parliament. Lets go to an election.. If Harper gets a majority, at least we&amp;#039;ll have lost on principle. If Canadians want this type of governing, they get the government they deserve. so be it </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/ndp-rejects-federal-budget/#IDComment136872258</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : NDP rejects federal budget </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/ndp-rejects-federal-budget/#IDComment136865764</link>
<description>Way to go Jack. I join other Liberals in saying I&amp;#039;m very proud of you.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 22:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/ndp-rejects-federal-budget/#IDComment136865764</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ignatieff&#039;s roots, immigrant and otherwise</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/19/ignatieffs-roots-immigrant-and-otherwise/#IDComment136078826</link>
<description>The only thing that is &amp;#039;cheap and nasty&amp;#039; is the PMO trying to belittle Ignatieff&amp;#039;s family as being somehow less praiseworthy immigrants then others.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/19/ignatieffs-roots-immigrant-and-otherwise/#IDComment136078826</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Things we can learn from Michael Ignatieff&#039;s father</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/things-we-can-learn-from-michael-ignatieffs-father/#IDComment135968080</link>
<description>I didnt realize the Liberal Party was in government.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/18/things-we-can-learn-from-michael-ignatieffs-father/#IDComment135968080</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Meanwhile, at the Federal Court of Appeal</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/meanwhile-at-the-federal-court-of-appeal/#IDComment131736851</link>
<description>Well chet.. considering there aint an election right now.. these arent election results.. I&amp;#039;m not worried. If the Cons think they can win a majority, call an election.  The point is as it stands.. your party has broken the law ... and the fact you&amp;#039;re defending wrongdoing based on polling is a sad state of affairs.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2011 01:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/meanwhile-at-the-federal-court-of-appeal/#IDComment131736851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Meanwhile, at the Federal Court of Appeal</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/meanwhile-at-the-federal-court-of-appeal/#IDComment131719169</link>
<description>This kinda fits in with Jason Kenny&amp;#039;s narrative that these blasted judges won&amp;#039;t rule the way we the government want them to.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/meanwhile-at-the-federal-court-of-appeal/#IDComment131719169</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Charges laid</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/24/charges-laid#IDComment130490347</link>
<description>Conservatives are supposed to be the law and order party - apparently when the law gets in their way, they forget that part.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 04:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/24/charges-laid#IDComment130490347</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: &#039;Where is the minister?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/16/the-commons-where-is-the-minister/#IDComment128436227</link>
<description>I was more appalled that the Prime Minister is not only defending but apparently condoning a Minister that decided to lie to the H of C Committee and committed forgery.    The question isn&amp;#039;t whether it was Oda&amp;#039;s right or not to cut off funds to Kairos, or whether she and the government were right to do so - that&amp;#039;s a different matter entirely - the question is how Oda went about doing it and the fact she lied about it.  It&amp;#039;s not the crime - it&amp;#039;s the coverup, as they say.. or in this case.. it&amp;#039;s not the cutting, but the lying.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/16/the-commons-where-is-the-minister/#IDComment128436227</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;Canada is, and always has been, our country&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/23/canada-is-and-always-has-been-our-country/#IDComment123441144</link>
<description>..for rabid Con supporters - yes.. but pretty lacking in visionary goals for the future. IF all Harper can think up of is pie-in-the-sky Senate Reform and trying to again kill the long-gun registry, that&amp;#039;s pretty meagre stuff.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/23/canada-is-and-always-has-been-our-country/#IDComment123441144</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Montreal Jews fear hate campaign</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/montreal-jews-fear-hate-campaign/#IDComment121976833</link>
<description>James, try to raise your level of discourse beyond &amp;quot;smear&amp;quot; occasionally. It will make for much better reading on the thread. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/montreal-jews-fear-hate-campaign/#IDComment121976833</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Montreal Jews fear hate campaign</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/montreal-jews-fear-hate-campaign/#IDComment121976660</link>
<description>classless as usual I see.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/montreal-jews-fear-hate-campaign/#IDComment121976660</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The new Conservative ads</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/the-new-conservative-ads/#IDComment121975187</link>
<description>I see the Conservative supporters are just as ready to drop cheapshots as their heroes in government.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/17/the-new-conservative-ads/#IDComment121975187</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Opposition fights cuts to party subsidies</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/14/opposition-fights-cuts-to-party-subsidies/#IDComment121673620</link>
<description>There are many countries that have publicly financed elections. That would include the United States (though it&amp;#039;s an either/or option for the presidential candidates). This is not something Chretien came out of the blue with. He had precedents from other countries  to use... and in doing what he did.. he did cut out the big funding his own Liberal Party got from some corporations.. a noble and principled measure. Harper, on the other hand, is trying to turn this into a way to kneecap other parties.         And I find it rather rich (no pun intended) that Harper claims this system is wasteful to the Canadian taxpayers, when it costs a mere 27 million $.. and it is basically self-funded by giving a party 2$ per voter... when this guy spent a billion plus dollars on the G20.. wants to spend 16 billion $   on an untendered sole source stealth  fighter jet.. and whose government has suddenly decided to start up the &amp;quot;Canada Economic Action Plan&amp;quot; ads on TV again, which cost a bunch of money to run. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/01/14/opposition-fights-cuts-to-party-subsidies/#IDComment121673620</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>