<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/562811</link>
		<description>Comments by ScottFeschuk</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Stephen Harper’s lessons in strategery</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/01/stephen-harper%e2%80%99s-lessons-in-strategery#IDComment139262198</link>
<description>I would not at all be pissed. I would respect the outcome and hope my fears prove unfounded. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Apr 2011 02:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/01/stephen-harper%e2%80%99s-lessons-in-strategery#IDComment139262198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : We&#039;re back. And now we will be going.</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/were-back-and-now-we-will-be-going/#IDComment136889966</link>
<description>If you take away the first sentence, this reads how Hemingway would have actually covered today. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/22/were-back-and-now-we-will-be-going/#IDComment136889966</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Go away, media. You&#039;re jerks and I hate you.</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/go-away-media-youre-jerks-and-i-hate-you/#IDComment134882910</link>
<description>i get paid in backrubs. coyne? magic fingers. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/14/go-away-media-youre-jerks-and-i-hate-you/#IDComment134882910</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : It&#039;s your stupidity, stupid </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/its-your-stupidity-stupid/#IDComment131659096</link>
<description>If only I&amp;#039;d said our dumbness transcends party lines and all parties have come to rely on it.  Oh, wait, I did. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Mar 2011 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/03/01/its-your-stupidity-stupid/#IDComment131659096</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : There, isn&#039;t that better?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/21/there-isnt-that-better/#IDComment129656284</link>
<description>You paying? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/02/21/there-isnt-that-better/#IDComment129656284</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Senators! Penguins! Typing!</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/22/senators-penguins-typing/#IDComment69731119</link>
<description>So what you&amp;#039;re saying then is that he&amp;#039;s out of luck? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/22/senators-penguins-typing/#IDComment69731119</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Senators! Penguins! Typing!</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/22/senators-penguins-typing/#IDComment69722924</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s a good question. My 8-year-old has a Roethlisberger jersey AND a huge Roethlisberger Fathead on his bedroom wall. Redecorating appears to be in order. He&amp;#039;s learning a lot of life lessons, consider he last year removed his David Ortiz Fathead because he kept reading about the steroid allegations...  Who is a safe sports figure to for an 8-year-old to look up to? Is there one? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/22/senators-penguins-typing/#IDComment69722924</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ottawa Senators Thought Experiment</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69387139</link>
<description>We care. At least, I care. It&amp;#039;s just that Spezza earns $7-million AND he has the strange habit of drawing the most possible attention to his miscues by ensuring THEY ARE GIGANTIC AND VERY CONSEQUENTIAL.   Turnover stats are useless in the NHL. Turnovers that lead directly to the other team scoring within 10 seconds - now THAT&amp;#039;s a category worth keeping, and one I&amp;#039;m confident that Spezza would lead the league in. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69387139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ottawa Senators Thought Experiment</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69319844</link>
<description>I still remember when I heard about Spezza&amp;#039;s $49-million contract extension. I was driving in the car with my then-six-year-old. I don&amp;#039;t often make predictions that could be considered accurate (as anyone who reads my nfl picks can attest), but i used a very specific verb that day. That verb was &amp;quot;rue.&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69319844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ottawa Senators Thought Experiment</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69318167</link>
<description>The officiating was spectacularly awful - although not particularly biased one way or another. They missed calls both ways. If you can divorce yourself from any rooting interest you might have in the game, it&amp;#039;s actually pretty hilarious to watch how a game is called. Getting your stick parallel to the ice and gently placing it on the torso of an opponent is an automatic penalty. Not an automatic penalty: Getting your stick parallel to the ice and ruthlessly smashing it against the back of an opponent&amp;#039;s head. Or elbowing a guy in the face. Or punching a guy in the teeth. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69318167</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ottawa Senators Thought Experiment</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69263548</link>
<description>Neil was good last night, but more important he achieved something truly rare: he scored a goal and was assessed a penalty AT THE SAME TIME.  Spezza also achieved something rare when he somehow refrained from turning over his power of attorney. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/21/ottawa-senators-thought-experiment/#IDComment69263548</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Mailbag: Barack Obama, Panicky Ash Sex, Monkey Butlers</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/mailbag-barack-obama-panicky-ash-sex-monkey-butlers/#IDComment69027808</link>
<description>plus one. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/04/20/mailbag-barack-obama-panicky-ash-sex-monkey-butlers/#IDComment69027808</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Note to the commenters</title>
<link>http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/note-to-the-commenters/#IDComment64079154</link>
<description>Adding my $0.02: I&amp;rsquo;ve always found the comments on our site to be &amp;ndash; for the most part - thoughtful, entertaining and literate (the latter being an especially remarkable achievement in this day and age). You folks add a lot of value. Perhaps I&amp;rsquo;ve got a thicker skin than most in that I&amp;rsquo;ve been getting hate mail (mixed in with the fan mail my grandma writes) for more than a decade now, but I&amp;rsquo;m not wild about those (either blogger or commenter) who take their ball and go home because they&amp;rsquo;re wounded by an insult or by an attack on their point of view. Let&amp;rsquo;s toughen up people! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://macleans.wordpress.com/2010/03/25/note-to-the-commenters/#IDComment64079154</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music but not jazz (you’re welcome)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64072959</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s like they recorded that video inside my dreams. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64072959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music but not jazz (you’re welcome)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051744</link>
<description>I did take a half class in classical music at UWO. I think it was in the summer. It speaks to my failings as a sophisticate that I did worse in that class than I did in calculus. And I only attended about three of my calculus classes. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051744</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music but not jazz (you’re welcome)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051408</link>
<description>I can handle the whole Beach House album at once, but I&amp;#039;m 40% teenage girl so I&amp;#039;m capable of enduring a tremendous amount of preciousness. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051408</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music but not jazz (you’re welcome)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051232</link>
<description>Can&amp;#039;t say I saw Cult/GNR at the EX, although i probably SHOULD say it since it sounds like it would have been epic. Hard to imagine Axl being in an opening band - deprived of his God-given right to make people wait four hours for him to perform.  Good list of tunes, jolyon. Even better by Noah and the Whale is First Days of Spring. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64051232</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Music but not jazz (you’re welcome)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64041156</link>
<description>luckily merritt is also in two or three other bands so he could record his other five billion songs. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/25/music-but-not-jazz-you%e2%80%99re-welcome/#IDComment64041156</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Mailbag: Luge etiquette, Helena’s rear end, Jaffer’s comeback</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/12/mailbag-luge-etiquette-helena%e2%80%99s-rear-end-jaffer%e2%80%99s-comeback/#IDComment61749977</link>
<description>ex canuck: So what you&amp;#039;re saying is that some people return, week after week, to things they hate just to make sure they still suck? I&amp;#039;m overdue for a visit to Cuba Gooding&amp;#039;s film career. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/12/mailbag-luge-etiquette-helena%e2%80%99s-rear-end-jaffer%e2%80%99s-comeback/#IDComment61749977</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Best—and Worst</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/11/the-best%e2%80%94and-worst/#IDComment61698930</link>
<description>Anyone who waited six hours to get into the Mint has already suffered enough. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/03/11/the-best%e2%80%94and-worst/#IDComment61698930</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>