Sam_Handwich

Sam_Handwich

65p

131 comments posted · 76 followers · following 0

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - New ad in support of N... · 0 replies · +3 points

the quality of the audio is impressive

/sarcasm off

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Breaking: California d... · 0 replies · +25 points

my favs:

this Court finds that Congress cannot, like an ostrich, merely bury its head in the sand and wait for danger to pass, especially at the risk of permitting continued constitutional injury upon legally married couples. The fact that the issue is socially divisive does nothing to relieve the judiciary of its obligation to examine the constitutionality of the discriminating classifications in the law.

...

The first factor courts consider is whether the class has suffered a history of discrimination. There is no dispute in the record that lesbians and gay men have experienced a long history of discrimination.

...

Regardless of the evidence that a tiny percentage of gay men or lesbians may experience some flexibility along the continuum of their sexuality or the scientific consensus that sexual orientation is unchangeable, the Court finds persuasive the holding in the Ninth Circuit that sexual orientation is recognized as a defining and immutable characteristic because it is so fundamental to one’s identity.

12 years ago @ HillBuzz.org - Sheriff Paul Babeu: An... · 1 reply · +5 points

When did either Crist or Craig come out???

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - The problem with Gov. ... · 2 replies · +6 points

Too bad the NJ Supremes didn't follow the lead of the Mass SJC. When the legislature tried to weasel out of the Goodridge ruling by suggesting a civil union bill in 2004, the court shot back:

The holding in Goodridge, by which we are bound, is that group classifications based on unsupportable distinctions, such as that embodied in the proposed bill, are invalid under the Massachusetts Constitution. The history of our nation has demonstrated that separate is seldom, if ever, equal....

We are of the opinion that Senate No. 2175 violates the equal protection and due process requirements of the Constitution of the Commonwealth and the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. .... The bill maintains an unconstitutional, inferior, and discriminatory status for same-sex couples

The answer to the question is "No."

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - What to watch today in... · 2 replies · +2 points

24-16 <<< Is that veto proof?

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - What to know about tom... · 2 replies · +1 points

I'm just curious ... Would a split ruling (2-1) on any of the issues make the 9th Circuit more likely to hear an en banc appeal than unanimous rulings would?

My feeling has been that the decisions on Standing and Recusal will be unanimous, while the Due Process/Equal Protection question will be split in our favor. (Of course, i also thought the Patriots would win the super bowl)

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - BREAKING: 9th Circuit ... · 1 reply · +11 points

It can't. They are DESPERATE TRAPPED RATS!!

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Washington Senate to v... · 2 replies · +4 points

6:48PM they're still adding stupid amendments to "protect" jesus or whatever

12 years ago @ Equality on Trial - Washington Senate to v... · 1 reply · +3 points

30-40 minutes at 350 F. be sure to baste occasionally.