Good sir, at this remark I titter aloud. The veracity of its design is impeccable. However, I would like to cordially direct ye to the fortuity that at least one of thy solicitudes regarding the correspondence of the individual in the electronic image to a chap with good breeding and social stature has been contemplated. There is one fundamental predicament that follows the utilization of the aforementioned tobacco combusting apparatus that is largely associated to the acclaimed discoverer of truths, Sherlock Holmes. When this pipe- if I may- is in use, it requires that the operator sacrifice the availability of a hand in order to redistribute the weight of the apparatus away from the lips. Doing so will result in a detrimental reduction of combative prowess. Therefore, in order to retain the utmost efficiency in slaying aptitude, it was decided that the gentleman would relegate the standards of his paraphernalia for the sake of a bolstering of his slaying to demise correlation. However, to your remark upon the absence of a monocular vision enhancement device, I possess no response. For that, as the author of this electronic image, I offer ye a formal apology. Spoken in simpler diction, ididitforthelulz.