<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/328831</link>
		<description>Comments by SHC</description>
<item>
<title>KATU - Portland, OR : Toll idea now floated for I-205 as well | KATU.com - Portland, Oregon | News</title>
<link>http://www.katu.com/news/39813702.html#IDComment15491527</link>
<description>Maybe they should consider putting a toll on 217 to reduce traffic...make it the beaverton -portland turnpike.  It will also help pay for the work!! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.katu.com/news/39813702.html#IDComment15491527</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KATU - Portland, OR : Toll idea now floated for I-205 as well | KATU.com - Portland, Oregon | News</title>
<link>http://www.katu.com/news/39813702.html#IDComment15458210</link>
<description>If the toll that would be put on the 205 bridge would be used strictly for the farce that they want to replace the interstate bridge with, then I can see the point. But that is not what the money will be used for.  They want to use the money for other things that do nothing for transportation.  I live in Vancouver and work on my side of the river, so a toll will only affect me when I go to Oregon to spend money.Therefore, when they do place a toll on the 205 bridge, I will not be spending my money in Oregon any more.  And I spend way more money in Oregon than what they would collect from me in a toll. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.katu.com/news/39813702.html#IDComment15458210</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>