Thing is this proves the people that didn't accept it right. Instead of showing he's changed to the guys that said they were going to watch him and see if he has, he's just trying to shame them into thinking they've done something wrong.
You're expecting a Wrestling news site in 2018 to do more than cut and paste a sentence from the observer without looking into it?
"awful loading times, slow action, and heavy on glitches"
That actually sounds like the perfect port of a Yukes made WWE game to me.
I started reading Tito's stuff because he used to have some good insight. Nowadays it's more like he's happy turning this into some weird troll column designed to get views from people he conflicts with. Fine he was critical about NJPW in his last column, looking at how they haven't penetrated the U.S market is a subject worth looking at, but then he spends more time insulting fans of it that he's arguing with.
I equate reading his stuff like waiting to be served in a shop while the owner pointlessly argues with a customer, you went there just to get something, but now you have to awkwardly wait while stuff you couldn't care less about wastes your time.
For me WWE just doesn't work as an "episodic" TV show. You can tune out for months and everything will still be the same when you come back. If there is a good match you can watch it stand alone as the context rarely adds anything like great feuds of the past used to do. Also the biggest belt on Raw isn't even being defended, MITB is a tired concept that needs a rest so it can be interesting again, and Reigns & Jinder are still getting focus despite both being people fans have proven they have very little interest in.
But sadly due to TV Networks being in the shape they're in WWE have no need to change or improve, and WWE can make money hand over fist while pumping out some of the blandest and creatively bankrupt stuff they've ever done.
Sadly because their new TV deals have netted them so much money they don't need to improve.
Would have bought the praise more if you hadn't heaped so much on a Kongo Kong match. I think Cage has potential, but nobody is redefining the Big Man Match with Kong, at least not in a positive way.
I wouldn't be so hasty to praise their work in Britain as "embracing indy talent". The UK tournament was created around the time ITV was working on WoS, then.when the pilot didn't produce a series and live events got cancelled, the WWE dropped all talk of their planned ongoing British show. Now WoS has a series and WWE started working on another UK tournament.
Lesnar is a genetic freak, but his MMA record does have three losses he isn't invincible, if you actually look at his MMA career he's 5-3-0 so he's slightly above average not counting his scrubbed, due to PEDs, victory against Hunt. Even in the world of WWE he lost to 40 year old Triple-H (who Seth beat) and 50 year old Goldberg so he has precedent for losing.
Just as a bystander, you seem more mentally ill than successful. Also dyslexia is a terrible excuse as you can learn how to work with it, I have, it's not a disability, it just takes a bit of effort.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Thingamajig