<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/637156</link>
		<description>Comments by SBABG</description>
<item>
<title>Salvo Magazine: Science, Sex, Society : Salvo Magazine: Sex on the Syllabus by Joe Jablonski - Archives</title>
<link>http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/archives/academia/jablonski.php#IDComment35520991</link>
<description>This goes back to the old debates about &amp;quot;studying sirens&amp;quot; . . . how close is too close before you crash your ship on the rocks.  Pornography addiction is a real problem in America, just as is drug addiction.  Do you have to experience the arousal of viewing pornography in order to understand it?  If so, doesn&amp;#039;t it also hold that one must experience drug use in order to understand it?  If by &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of a subject we require experiencing it, we have some real problems.  Students of &amp;quot;prostitution&amp;quot; ought to selling themselves, right?  Or at least ought to be johns . . .  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/archives/academia/jablonski.php#IDComment35520991</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Salvo Magazine: Science, Sex, Society : Salvo Magazine: Sex on the Syllabus by Joe Jablonski - Archives</title>
<link>http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/archives/academia/jablonski.php#IDComment35520137</link>
<description>Maybe ASU should teach a class on drug use and require the students to snort some blow! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salvomag.com/new/articles/archives/academia/jablonski.php#IDComment35520137</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The next Da Vinci Code?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/17/the-next-da-vinci-code/#IDComment34928916</link>
<description>Thanks for clearing that up for the writer, Russell.  I think the full Masonic distress call is something like, &amp;quot;Oh Lord, My God, is there no help for the widow&amp;#039;s son?&amp;quot;  and there has been speculation that Joseph Smith was through the &amp;quot;Oh Lord, My God&amp;quot; half when shot . . .  but I&amp;#039;ve never heard a single claim, ever, from any official or unofficial source, that what was uttered was &amp;quot;is there no help for the widow&amp;#039;s son?&amp;quot; FWIW.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/09/17/the-next-da-vinci-code/#IDComment34928916</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Daily Uprising : Giant 9-12 Link-a-Thon:  Links to Stories, Photos, and Attendance Statistics from Across the &#039;Net</title>
<link>http://dailyuprising.com/blog/random-thoughts/giant-9-12-link-a-thon-links-to-stories-photos-and-attendance-statistics-from-across-the-net/#IDComment34480554</link>
<description>Hey, thanks for the link to SBABG.org&amp;#039;s photos.  It&amp;#039;s much appreciated.  and thanks for providing the roundup.  that made it a lot easier to get around . . .  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dailyuprising.com/blog/random-thoughts/giant-9-12-link-a-thon-links-to-stories-photos-and-attendance-statistics-from-across-the-net/#IDComment34480554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama admin. to end cash for clunkers on Monday</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31390427</link>
<description>Good riddance.  Cash for Clunkers was just the latest version of the Broken Window Fallacy at work.   It did irreparable economic damage.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sbabg.org/2009/08/03/cash-for-clunkers-is-a-modern-day-version-of-the-broken-window-fallacy/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.sbabg.org/2009/08/03/cash-for-clunkers...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31390427</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>