gdp's Comments

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:27:00 +0000

http://current.com/items/89204971_death-star-over...

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:25:35 +0000

Hmmm... No way the planes could be a hologram? http://current.com/items/89204971_death-star-over...

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:13:06 +0000

Further, we had a later conversation via e-mail with Crockett Grabbe, a former University of Iowa visiting professor from Caltech (Steve Koonin co-professor), who wrote a guest article with the paper supporting the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. In his response to my questioning of his article, he indicated that the charges set in building seven were set such that they were inaudible which explained why NIST found that building seven did not make any sound entirely through the internal progressive collapse and partially through the global collapse (disproving the strawman that explosives and thermitics were used to destroy the building). Obviously, NIST cornered themselves by stating that the buildings, made up of thousands of tons of steel (similar to dump trucks), could collapse for many seconds without emitting any crashing sounds. Further, they exposed Grabbe and Grabbe exposed himself and anyone in the Scholars group that he associates himself with as leaders of the diversion away from the physical evidence. Why would anyone say the building fell without crashing sounds unless they don't want people to consider what the NIST had said?

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:12:49 +0000

No, I met with the Gazette and they have yet to return to me with any refutation of anything that I presented. Our pictorial evidence allowed them to make their own decisions about what they were seeing. What was interesting was how simple they found the determinations that they made for themselves.

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:00:28 +0000

So, if the physical evidence of the crime scene completely contradicts our understanding of the crime (planes, box cutters, extremist terrorists), how will we ever find closure to this event? The simple answer is, we will not. Russ Gerst of Cedar Rapids is a financial analyst and 1988 Coe College cum laude graduate with degrees in business and accounting and a minor in mathematics. Contact him at rdgerst@iname.com" I have not made any reference to the Bush Administration and any culpability in 9/11. The evidence doesn't directly connect them, but I do have tremendous documentation of the coverup and the culpable players. There is also strong evidence that two corporations have been involved in the cover-up having known full well that technology exists (which they have financially supported) and that the evidence presented by NIST was not borne out by the pictorial evidence. We must start with the pictorial evidence and let it and the measurement data take us where it leads. Until that point, the errors in blame for who committed the atrocities of 9/11 will continue.

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:00:19 +0000

Cars as close as a block away and as far away as a mile were inexplicably delaminated, charred, and in some cases, engine blocks disintegrated. Sound recordings of WTC 7 (destroyed during the afternoon) adjusted for relevant distance were devoid of the sound of falling debris many seconds after collapse initiation cited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology in their report of the building’s demise. Magnetometer readings from Alaska indicated abrupt changes to the earth’s magnetic field at precisely the time of the plane entries and building destruction at the WTC. A large, powerful hurricane (Erin) southeast of the coast of New York went unreported. Outer bands reached the Massachusetts coast as it turned slowly and abruptly that day. Reached Category 3 status on 9/10 during a four-day direct path from the Bahamas to New York with no evidence of direction change. Comparative analysis to electromagnetic interference technology using electromagnetic fields with various wavelengths of electromagnetic energy indicates strikingly similar material phenomena noted above."

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:00:02 +0000

Massive volumes of dust several inches thick (like snow) could be found for several square miles around the WTC complex. Large volumes of soil were hauled into Ground Zero, mixed with debris, and hauled away. Photographic evidence indicates this still occurring to this day. Trucks are thoroughly hosed down before leaving, as if contaminated." Frame by frame video analysis of the 175-foot plane striking the second tower indicates no deceleration from nose to tail (all frames indicate the same distance traveled). Yet the plane fully decelerated in the remaining 75 feet of building without exiting on the opposite side. Emergency personnel debriefing testimonies indicates no evidence of a screaming plane nor diving for cover. Contrarily, testimony of military plane noise indicated appropriate response to a further attack as witnesses noted hearing them and taking appropriate cover. Collapse times of the Twin Towers and Building Seven occurred at or beyond free-fall speed in a vacuum (no air resistance). Taking into account the relative volumes of building above and below the collapse zone, the collapses should have occurred far more slowly, if at all."

GazetteOnline.com : Evidence contradicts 9/11 crimes

Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:59:15 +0000

We are welcome to our own opinions, not to our own facts. What I included in my article was not opinion, but fact. Scientific reality is based on the evidence and any explanation of the reality as measured and documented must be based on known scientific understanding (to rule out the official theory). If known scientific understanding cannot explain what occurred, the evidence itself must point the way. In this case, the evidence and measurements point toward some form of interference technology using mutliple forms of electromagnetic energy. Part of the article was removed due to space limitations, but what I wrote was this:

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:51:59 +0000

The Gazette never took down any of my articles, particularly the article they published in July, 2009. This article prompted a follow-up editorial that was published in late July, 2009. The reason these articles are no longer available online is that the Gazette changed its web portal and did not pull forward all of their archives. Nothing that any commenter said caused the Gazette to step back and consider anything presented by me as false or misleading. Not one point.

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:07:40 +0000

Oh, yes. And you know the old child's rhyme: Sticks and stones... When someone has nothing left, they resort to calling names and calling someone crazy. That is when you know you've won the argument.

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:06:32 +0000

On what basis. Steel and cement are not prime firebuilding materials. They don't disappear when dropped to the ground. And these pictures were submitted to the NIST by Dr. Judy Wood in March of 2007

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:00:38 +0000

No material volumes of debris. Pointed out by the never before seen pictures by Dr. Wood after looking at thousands of pictures telling her the same thing. 1 school bus weighs ten tons. The two towers weighed a combined 1M tons. How does one hide 100,000 school buses? Only 1-2 stories of debris left. Nothing in the subbasements. Nothing outside the buidling footprint. Where did the debris go?

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:59:32 +0000

What? Answer this: No material volumes of debris. Pointed out by the never before seen pictures by Dr. Wood after looking at thousands of pictures telling her the same thing. 1 school bus weighs ten tons. The two towers weighed a combined 1M tons. How does one hide 100,000 school buses? Only 1-2 stories of debris left. Nothing in the subbasements. Nothing outside the buidling footprint. Where did the debris go?

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:58:41 +0000

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:58:11 +0000

This is not political. No material volumes of debris. Pointed out by the never before seen pictures by Dr. Wood after looking at thousands of pictures telling her the same thing. 1 school bus weighs ten tons. The two towers weighed a combined 1M tons. How does one hide 100,000 school buses? Only 1-2 stories of debris left. Nothing in the subbasements. Nothing outside the buidling footprint. Where did the debris go?

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:51:38 +0000

With any kind of research, yes, they should have known. These photos are everywhere. Google 9/11 and what do you get?

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:49:15 +0000

So, I take it you got nothing...

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:35:03 +0000

Folks need to explain this Andrew: http://physicalevidenceofgroundzero.x10hosting.co... 25 slides that show no debris of any quantity outside the borders to the WTC, less than 2 stories of debris above the Twin Towers, nothing on the other WTC buildings, WTC 3, WTC 4 disappeared, WTC 5 and 6 hollowed out and WTC7 didn't even cross the street next to it on all sides. No debris filling the subbasements, massive holes below ground, and no damage to the bathtub. The debris is gone!! Dr. Wood has pointed this out and used the photos ABC says are new to point that out years ago.

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:30:13 +0000

http://tiny.cc/sawyerbubbler The webpage is splitting the link.

GazetteOnline.com : ABC-TV News' Trade Towers report raises questions

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:28:41 +0000

http://tiny.cc/sawyerbubbler The webpage is splitting the link. The big deal is that they call these photos "never before seen aerial photos." This is not true. Period. They were not under wraps. They were in the public sphere for years. Big press release, bit to-do, not truthful. No retraction.