<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1277404</link>
		<description>Comments by Rorschach256</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : University of Wisconsin Medical School Launches Investigation of Doctors&#039; Fake Sick Notes</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/02/21/university-of-wisconsin-medical-school-launches-investigation-of-doctors-fake-sick-notes/#IDComment129859115</link>
<description>If they still have a job after all is said and done, i&amp;#039;m pretty sure the Wisconsin Senate will be looking to defund the University of Wisconsin Medical school... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/02/21/university-of-wisconsin-medical-school-launches-investigation-of-doctors-fake-sick-notes/#IDComment129859115</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Pigford Shakedown: How the Black Farmers&#039; Cause Was Hijacked by Politic</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/12/06/the-pigford-shakedown-how-the-black-farmers-cause-was-hijacked-by-politicians-trial-lawyers-community-organizers-leaving-us-with-a-billion-dollar-tab/#IDComment114105657</link>
<description>Come Jan 20, all we have to do is to repeal the pigford settlement by an act of congress. the checks will not have been sent out by then I&amp;#039;m sure. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Dec 2010 17:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/12/06/the-pigford-shakedown-how-the-black-farmers-cause-was-hijacked-by-politicians-trial-lawyers-community-organizers-leaving-us-with-a-billion-dollar-tab/#IDComment114105657</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Who is Killing Iran&#039;s Nuclear Scientists?</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2010/11/29/who-is-killing-irans-nuclear-scientists/#IDComment112927698</link>
<description>It is my understanding that it was an explosively formed penetrator (similar to the IED&amp;#039;s that iran ships to iraq for roadside bombs, but smaller, like a perf gun for an oil well.) that was stuck using an instant adhesive onto the side window of the vehicle by the passenger of a two person motorcycle team that rode up next to the vehicle, attached the bomb, and then disappeared in traffic seconds before the bomb detonated, spraying the driver&amp;#039;s compartment with shrapnel. of course it COULD have been magnetic and stuck to the roof of the vehicle above the driver&amp;#039;s seat as well, either would work, and the magnet would probably be easier to accomplish. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/stzu/2010/11/29/who-is-killing-irans-nuclear-scientists/#IDComment112927698</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : There Is Nothing New Under the Wikileaks Sun</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/11/29/there-is-nothing-new-under-the-wikileaks-sun/#IDComment112925363</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s currently operating in the US on Amazon.com&amp;#039;s rental servers to get around the DDoS attack which shut down his european servers. so why can&amp;#039;t we shut him down and seize the data now that it is in the US? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/11/29/there-is-nothing-new-under-the-wikileaks-sun/#IDComment112925363</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : There Is Nothing New Under the Wikileaks Sun</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/11/29/there-is-nothing-new-under-the-wikileaks-sun/#IDComment112923463</link>
<description>supposedly the site has been hammered by a massive DDoS attack. all morning and is unavailable in the US or Europe as of this moment...  &lt;a href=&quot;http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/11/30/wikileaks-hit-by-powerful-cyber-attack/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2010/11/30/wikileaks-...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/11/29/there-is-nothing-new-under-the-wikileaks-sun/#IDComment112923463</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Confessions of a Libertarian on Immigration</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dtrowbridge/2010/11/16/confessions-of-a-libertarian-on-immigration/#IDComment110136831</link>
<description>The law already requires immigrants to carry their papers with them at all times. there just hasn&amp;#039;t been a law that would allow anyone to ask for them until now. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dtrowbridge/2010/11/16/confessions-of-a-libertarian-on-immigration/#IDComment110136831</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : GOP Rep. Spencer Bachus Lashes Out at Tea Party, Sarah Palin</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/rmuny/2010/11/09/gop-rep-spencer-bachus-lashes-out-at-tea-party-sarah-palin/#IDComment108941568</link>
<description>That is an unfair statement about drunken sailors. When a drunken sailor runs out of money he goes back to the ship to sleep it off. Obama doesn&amp;#039;t. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/rmuny/2010/11/09/gop-rep-spencer-bachus-lashes-out-at-tea-party-sarah-palin/#IDComment108941568</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Full Burn.</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cmuir/2010/10/27/full-burn/#IDComment106392686</link>
<description>Speaking of Suicide NASA Pilots:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1324192/Nasa-plan-Hundred-Year-Starship--mission-astronauts-Mars-leave-forever.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cmuir/2010/10/27/full-burn/#IDComment106392686</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : TPM Frets Over ACORN and Other Democrat Nuts</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/10/25/tpm-frets-over-acorn-and-other-democrat-nuts/#IDComment106047318</link>
<description>Sad fact of the matter is that this app is illegal in Texas, and probably most other states as well. no audio or video recording device or cell phone can be used in a polling location. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2010/10/25/tpm-frets-over-acorn-and-other-democrat-nuts/#IDComment106047318</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Want to Stop Voter Fraud? There&#039;s an App for That!</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mroman/2010/10/25/want-to-stop-voter-fraud-theres-an-app-for-that/#IDComment106003956</link>
<description>I am neither, I am a  GOP precinct Chair and Election judge for my precinct. I have a legal and moral duty to uphold the election laws. This is illegal in Texas, and likely in most other states as well. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mroman/2010/10/25/want-to-stop-voter-fraud-theres-an-app-for-that/#IDComment106003956</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Want to Stop Voter Fraud? There&#039;s an App for That!</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mroman/2010/10/25/want-to-stop-voter-fraud-theres-an-app-for-that/#IDComment105984725</link>
<description>This App is illegal in Texas. No cell phone, audio or video recording device may be used within 100ft of a polling location. I am en election judge in Harris County, and if anyone comes in to the polling locaton using their cell phone, I will be asking them to either turn it off or leave. If they don&amp;#039;t comply, I will be forced to have them physically removed. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mroman/2010/10/25/want-to-stop-voter-fraud-theres-an-app-for-that/#IDComment105984725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Powers That Be : Obama Insisted Mythbusters Re-Try Busting a Myth?</title>
<link>http://dougpowers.com/2010/10/18/obama-insisted-mythbusters-re-try-busting-a-myth/#IDComment104661675</link>
<description>except she is a vegan who hates guns....</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dougpowers.com/2010/10/18/obama-insisted-mythbusters-re-try-busting-a-myth/#IDComment104661675</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : NJ Dem Staffer Slaps 68-Year-Old Woman</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/nj-dem-staffer-slaps-68-year-old-woman/#IDComment102711086</link>
<description>She shoulda pulled her gun and blew his friggin head off. Oh, Wait, this is New Jersey, apparently your second amendment rights don&amp;#039;t exist there... I assure you that would have been the case here in Houston. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/nj-dem-staffer-slaps-68-year-old-woman/#IDComment102711086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : American Rancher X - Part 1</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/pdollard/2010/09/14/american-rancher-x-part-1/#IDComment98781352</link>
<description>Someone replied that Texas did not allow you to shoot someone trespassing on your property, funny that the reply disappeared, perhaps the OP decided to delete it. Anyway here is the link to the Texas Penal Code Chapter that covers Deadly Force: &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us\/docs\/PE\/htm\/PE.9.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/PE/htm...&lt;/a&gt;    the important bit is this:  Sec. 9.41.  PROTECTION OF ONE&amp;#039;S OWN PROPERTY.  (a)  A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other&amp;#039;s trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.    (b)  A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:    (1)  the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor; or    (2)  the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.    Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.   Sec. 9.42.  DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.  A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:    (1)  if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and    (2)  when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:    (A)  to prevent the other&amp;#039;s imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or    (B)  to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and    (3)  he reasonably believes that:    (A)  the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or    (B)  the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.    They were on his land carrying obvious weapons and acting like idiots (drunk or stoned perhaps?). AND there were at least four of them vs one of him. It would be arguable that he felt threatened and therefore justified. I&amp;#039;m not saying the rancher would do so, but it could be argued that it was within his rights to do so, especially if all of you bought the farm. who would there be to say otherwise? the drug smugglers?  And if it had been at night, the rules are even more lax. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/pdollard/2010/09/14/american-rancher-x-part-1/#IDComment98781352</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : American Rancher X - Part 1</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/pdollard/2010/09/14/american-rancher-x-part-1/#IDComment98770844</link>
<description>What in hell were you doing on private property without the permission of the property owner anyway? You sir are lucky he didn&amp;#039;t shoot YOU for trespass. In Texas it would have been his right to do so. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/pdollard/2010/09/14/american-rancher-x-part-1/#IDComment98770844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Zsa Zsa Gabor husband wants to plastinate wife\&#039;s body</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91cc350cfed23f483b23ec44acc183c7.1a1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment96592981</link>
<description>You mean she isn&amp;#039;t already? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.91cc350cfed23f483b23ec44acc183c7.1a1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment96592981</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Houston Election Headquarters Warehouse Destroyed by Fire, Just Days After Fraud Allegations</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/27/houston-election-headquarters-warehouse-destroyed-by-fire-just-days-after-fraud-allegations/#IDComment95879899</link>
<description>I agree TXGuitarGuy. Assuming this is found to be arson, it is clear that there is absolutely NO reason for Republicans to do this, they have everything to lose and nothing to gain by doing this. The Dems on the other hand have everything to gain and nothing to lose. After all, they are going to get swept this go-round. They are the only ones with motive.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/27/houston-election-headquarters-warehouse-destroyed-by-fire-just-days-after-fraud-allegations/#IDComment95879899</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Houston Election Headquarters Warehouse Destroyed by Fire, Just Days After Fraud Allegations</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/27/houston-election-headquarters-warehouse-destroyed-by-fire-just-days-after-fraud-allegations/#IDComment95581944</link>
<description>Ok some minor corrections: The warehouse only housed the election machines and the forms, the registrations and all of that are stored downtown at the Harris county courthouse. The warehouse is not under Leo Vasquesz&amp;#039;s dominion, that is actually the County Clerk&amp;#039;s office that maintains and administers the election, the tax assessor-collector only handles voter registrations.They are separate functions. Harris county is actually quite red, there is however a blue zone near downtown that unfortunately elects Sheila Jackson Lee every year. but this year that might change.  for early voting which starts on Oct. 2, the county plans on borrowing machines from other counties to accomplish the task. but I&amp;#039;m afraid that election day is going to be hell.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://redinktexas.blogspot.com/2010/08/harris-county-voters-are-so-very.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://redinktexas.blogspot.com/2010/08/harris-co...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/27/houston-election-headquarters-warehouse-destroyed-by-fire-just-days-after-fraud-allegations/#IDComment95581944</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NBC, CBS Reject Anti-Ground Zero Mosque Ad</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/14/nbc-cbs-reject-anti-ground-zero-mosque-ad/#IDComment86820062</link>
<description>Uh, I&amp;#039;m not certain but I am fairly sure this violates the &amp;quot;reasonable access&amp;quot; rules regarding political programming/advertising of the FCC. Not that the Obama administration would ever dare intervene on behalf of a conservative or a christian. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/14/nbc-cbs-reject-anti-ground-zero-mosque-ad/#IDComment86820062</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Either Olbermann Doesn&#039;t Know How to Use Google... or He&#039;s a Liar</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2010/07/13/either-olbermann-doesnt-know-how-to-use-google-or-hes-a-liar/#IDComment86497614</link>
<description>Why is this an either or choice? Can it not possibly be both? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/sright/2010/07/13/either-olbermann-doesnt-know-how-to-use-google-or-hes-a-liar/#IDComment86497614</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>