<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/314627</link>
		<description>Comments by Robnigh</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Libya Rebels Blame NATO for Deadly Airstrike</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/libya-rebels-blame-nato-for-deadly-airstrike/#IDComment141039158</link>
<description>Libya, for most of its history going back to Greek and Roman times, was divided into Tripolitania in the West and Cyrenaica in the East. This is a division that clearly still exists while the country is held together by the Gadafi regime. If Obama was the &amp;quot;cerebral&amp;quot; student of history that the media claimed he is he would have at least mentioned this and would try to broker a deal to bring the nation back to its traditional status instead of wasting American hardware and prestige on something as stupid as &amp;quot;kinetic military action.&amp;quot;. Even an ignorant winger like me can figure that out. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/libya-rebels-blame-nato-for-deadly-airstrike/#IDComment141039158</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Disabled girl\&#039;s mum takes on PM</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dd4a72c03d05289270a5b0c91dbe7e44.711&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122596194</link>
<description>While this is indeed very sad, I can&amp;#039;t believe that the mother (I assume she doesn&amp;#039;t pay out of pocket) is getting the extensive and expensive care for this child in a facility and before that at home and is complaining that it isn&amp;#039;t enough. Of course I want this child to be cared for, but if they&amp;#039;re living under artificial means at a huge cost with no hope of recovery, I have to question why this mother would not want the child in the facility where her daughter could get the proper care she needs and the mother can get a break. It sounds like she&amp;#039;s upset with Cameron because she can&amp;#039;t take a vacation while NHS workers care for her daughter at her home which is absurd.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dd4a72c03d05289270a5b0c91dbe7e44.711&amp;show_article=1#IDComment122596194</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Palin hits back at Obama, media after slip-up</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112133185</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Always divisive&amp;quot;??? I suppose if I worked for AFP I would think it was divisive when Sarah Palin said anything too. Particularly when she talks about the greatness of America or how free enterprise is a desirable trait in a nation. This type of garbage journalism is why I would encourage any bright, young conservatives to consider beecomming reporters. Consider it a service to a grateful nation who needs you/. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0c72364653fa48fde37dd48eded0946e.501&amp;show_article=1#IDComment112133185</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Blumenthal, McMahon trade jabs at Conn. debate</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IL8C400&show_article=1#IDComment102402553</link>
<description>This story does not accurately describe this debate. I watched it live and McMahon cleaned Blumenthal&amp;#039;s clock. I encourage everyone to check youtube for when she asked him how a jobs is created! If its not there, here&amp;#039;s a preview: &amp;quot;government intervention&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m not going to Washington to be an entrepreneur&amp;quot;! It was hilarious and a window into the thought of a typical liberal. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Oct 2010 02:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9IL8C400&show_article=1#IDComment102402553</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84763394</link>
<description>Isn&amp;#039;t it a little cowardly to claim in one post that Iran has no nukes and it is Israel who is the threat, then proclaim that it will be &amp;quot;wiped off the map&amp;quot; in another? Why can&amp;#039;t you, or the Iranian government just come out and state your intentions plainly? It&amp;#039;s pretty obvious what they are. If Islamic civilization is so superior to that of the west why does it continue to obfuscate in such a way and not just unite and declare war? cowards </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84763394</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84760396</link>
<description>Auswitchlinda sees Jewish conspiracies in his/her sleep. No objective observer can say that the Iranian regime is enough of a responsible world actor to possess nuclear weapons. Hopefully you and your heroes in Tehran will realize that the 12th Imam will never arrive and learn to coexist with people. If Iran doesn&amp;#039;t learn to coexist, they won&amp;#039;t have to worry about it because they won&amp;#039;t be around too much longer.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84760396</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84758660</link>
<description>Israel has had nuclear weapons for about 40 years and has never used them, even when attacked by the far larger armies of most of their friendly, peace-loving Arab neighbors. I&amp;#039;m not even sure why I&amp;#039;m responding after the Israel-9/11 comment though. You have certainly shown your ignorance. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84758660</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Colombian cops find World Cup _ made of cocaine</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GNPLSO0&show_article=1#IDComment84757749</link>
<description>Perhaps Michelle will see fit to promote cocaine in her childhood obesity campaign. With the Nazi-like focus on physical fitness at any cost it could be a useful tool!  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GNPLSO0&show_article=1#IDComment84757749</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84649230</link>
<description>Do you doubt the Iranians would use a nuclear weapon on Israel? Do you not recognize that half the Israeli population could be killed with one bomb? Or would you prefer to wait until that happenned to fulfill your anti-semitic fantasies? Has the Iranian regime acted logically and responsibly in the past, indicating that they would not use such a weapon? Why would they prefer these economic sanctions to increased trade and aid from the west to help their society prosper unless their religious fanaticism compelled them to do otherwise? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 02:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84649230</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84648513</link>
<description>I understand the concepts of liberty and sovereignty very well. I oppose the idea of American or any other foreign policy being dictated by the U.N., I recognize that governments exists at the will of the people and should not have a monopoly on firearms, however, like liberty and freedom, soverienty is surrendered when a country threatens to destroy another and begins the process of making those threats real. If your next door neighbor threatened to kill your family how long would you wait to stop him???  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84648513</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84648470</link>
<description>I understand the concepts of liberty and sovereignty very well. I oppose the idea of American or any other foreign policy being dictated by the U.N., I recognize that governments exists at the will of the people and should not have a monopoly on firearms, however, like liberty and freedom, soverienty is surrendered when a country threatens to destroy another and begins the process of making those threats real. If your next door neighbor threatened to kill your family how long would you wait to stop him???   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jul 2010 02:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84648470</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Iran moves radar to Syria: US official</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84390291</link>
<description>The quote: &amp;quot;Iran has insisted its enrichment effort is purely peaceful and aimed at generating electricity&amp;quot; is included in every single mainstream news story about the Iranian nuclear program. How else do they expect Iran to achieve its goal of &amp;quot;Wiping Israel (or the Zionist entity as it it called in Iran) of the map&amp;quot;? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Jul 2010 00:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.699bcb2d552c8ba0384b21f2f6b25a83.691&amp;show_article=1#IDComment84390291</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Germany \&#039;won\&#039;t give one cent to Greece\&#039;: minister</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.2d463dc1ea6baf7651f3f5c33b7f3824.51&amp;show_article=1#IDComment59908667</link>
<description>Greece has less of a fiscal problem than it does a communist riot problem. When like 60% of its people rely on tax dollars the only place the government has to go for money is debt. I wish John Maynard Keynes was alive to see his economic model carried out. You&amp;#039;d think Keynesians like Obama and Paul Krugman would notice this and take heed, but they won&amp;#039;t. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.2d463dc1ea6baf7651f3f5c33b7f3824.51&amp;show_article=1#IDComment59908667</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Eyes Wide Shut: How the Elephant In the Room Is Now Anchoring the Evening News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54761640</link>
<description>It typically does, but Fox uses &amp;quot;homocide&amp;quot; bomber when the bomber kills himself and others like the Bush administration used to. They call them suicide bombers when only the bomber dies. I prefer it because it puts the emphasis on the fact that the bombers are murderers, and their death shouldn&amp;#039;t even be acknowledged. I do realize that it may not be technically correct as a bomber who survives could also be a homocide bomber if they kill someone else, but anything that strips the terrorists of any amount of dignity is fine with me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54761640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Eyes Wide Shut: How the Elephant In the Room Is Now Anchoring the Evening News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54761027</link>
<description>Typical bureaucratic response. They make you upset with their idiocy or malevolence, then tell you that you&amp;#039;re upset instead of acknowledging that what they&amp;#039;re doing is the problem. Typical cowardly liberal behavior. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54761027</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Eyes Wide Shut: How the Elephant In the Room Is Now Anchoring the Evening News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54710684</link>
<description>What did they actually tell you was the reason for the editting? I&amp;#039;m interested in their phony excuses. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54710684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Eyes Wide Shut: How the Elephant In the Room Is Now Anchoring the Evening News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54710147</link>
<description>Fox uses homocide bomber only when the bomber kills others, suicide bomber when they only kill themself. I think it&amp;#039;s an appropriate term. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2010/01/31/eyes-wide-shut-how-the-elephant-in-the-room-is-now-anchoring-the-evening-news/#IDComment54710147</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Thousands feared dead in Haiti quake; many trapped</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D70GP00&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51895067</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s the most self-absorbed thing I&amp;#039;ve ever heard. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D70GP00&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51895067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : U.N. thanks China for contributing to U.N. peacekeeping operations </title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C37P2G3#IDComment44049445</link>
<description>Apparently a country has to be run by communists to recieved any kind of gratitude from the U.N. It would certainly explain the recent thaw in relations with the United States. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C37P2G3#IDComment44049445</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37956322</link>
<description>Apparenty, if you&amp;#039;re an American you get the Nobel Prize for forwarding the interests of any country but your own. If you&amp;#039;re a 3rd world despot like Arafat you get it for forwarding the interests of yourself. Obama is somewhere in between. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37956322</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>