<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/471530</link>
		<description>Comments by RobertCBaker</description>
<item>
<title>Bioethike : Berndt Hamm: Werner Elert as War Theologian 2</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2011/05/01/berndt-hamm-werner-elert-as-war-theologian-2/#IDComment149136768</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s a good question, Christian. My guess is that this type of preaching was typical in number of places and times. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 12:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2011/05/01/berndt-hamm-werner-elert-as-war-theologian-2/#IDComment149136768</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Post-Enlightenment Lutheranism, your days are numbered</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2011/04/18/post-enlightenment-lutheranism-your-days-are-numbered/#IDComment144505718</link>
<description>Christian, others might say post-Kantian. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2011/04/18/post-enlightenment-lutheranism-your-days-are-numbered/#IDComment144505718</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : The next step after contraception: Separating procreation from parenting</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/11/28/the-next-step-after-contraception-separating-procreation-from-parentin/#IDComment125233467</link>
<description>Thanks, Lisa. While I may disagree with your views on natural parenthood, you are indeed right in asking that those views be portrayed correctly. Please share the link to your paper, which I will read.&lt;br /&gt;Robert </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Feb 2011 19:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/11/28/the-next-step-after-contraception-separating-procreation-from-parentin/#IDComment125233467</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : More on Baby Boomers</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2011/01/02/more-on-babyboomers/#IDComment124705059</link>
<description>Hi, Christian. Sorry; I&amp;#039;ve been busy promoting Natural Law: A Lutheran Reappraisal. I&amp;#039;ll be back to blogging shortly.&lt;br /&gt;Robert </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2011/01/02/more-on-babyboomers/#IDComment124705059</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Arguments supporting the repeal of DADT, from a confessional Lutheran perspective</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/12/23/arguments-supporting-the-repeal-of-dadt-from-a-confessional-lutheran-perspective/#IDComment120318164</link>
<description>Karl,&lt;br /&gt;I agree with you. Gerhard wrote that the State, which operates on the basis of human reason and the natural law, is the \&quot;safe haven\&quot; of the Church.&lt;br /&gt;Robert </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/12/23/arguments-supporting-the-repeal-of-dadt-from-a-confessional-lutheran-perspective/#IDComment120318164</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Arguments supporting the repeal of DADT, from a confessional Lutheran perspective</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/12/23/arguments-supporting-the-repeal-of-dadt-from-a-confessional-lutheran-perspective/#IDComment120317844</link>
<description>Karl, the \&quot;hospitality\&quot; argument was used in support of the ELCA&amp;#039;s change in viewpoint on same-sex \&quot;marriage\&quot; and clergy expectations. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/12/23/arguments-supporting-the-repeal-of-dadt-from-a-confessional-lutheran-perspective/#IDComment120317844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : ELCA&#039;s Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson: A false teacher</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2009/12/11/elcas-presiding-bishop-mark-hanson-a-false-teacher/#IDComment116540987</link>
<description>Paul knew exactly what homosexual activity is: sin. Some Christians today, however, dismiss Paul as being unenlightened because he supposedly was ignorant about sexual orientation. That concept is relatively new. But Paul (and Jesus!) is still correct. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2009/12/11/elcas-presiding-bishop-mark-hanson-a-false-teacher/#IDComment116540987</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : ELCA&#039;s Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson: A false teacher</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2009/12/11/elcas-presiding-bishop-mark-hanson-a-false-teacher/#IDComment116425818</link>
<description>He at least has the spirit of the Antichrist. Scripture also talks about several antichrists. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2009/12/11/elcas-presiding-bishop-mark-hanson-a-false-teacher/#IDComment116425818</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Lutheran natural law book to appear January, 2011</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/10/22/lutheran-natural-law-book-to-appear-january-2011/#IDComment106496172</link>
<description>Gigalos, I don&amp;#039;t take kindly to those who try to commandeer my blog. Your remaining posts, as well as your IP, have been noted as spam.&lt;br /&gt;Robert </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 03:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/10/22/lutheran-natural-law-book-to-appear-january-2011/#IDComment106496172</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : The Church may need to get out of the marriage business</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/08/08/the-anchoress-the-church-may-need-to-get-out-of-the-marriage-business/#IDComment92524057</link>
<description>Hi Erich, I&amp;#039;m not aware of any detailed theological discussions about this. You raise some very good questions.  Robert </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/08/08/the-anchoress-the-church-may-need-to-get-out-of-the-marriage-business/#IDComment92524057</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Boston federal judge: DOMA violate states&#039; rights and Equal Protection Clause</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/07/09/boston-federal-judge-doma-violate-states-rights-and-equal-protection-clause/#IDComment88102346</link>
<description>Apparently, it&amp;#039;s the legal benefits they&amp;#039;re after, without all that nasty monogamy stuff. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/07/09/boston-federal-judge-doma-violate-states-rights-and-equal-protection-clause/#IDComment88102346</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Boston federal judge: DOMA violate states&#039; rights and Equal Protection Clause</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/07/09/boston-federal-judge-doma-violate-states-rights-and-equal-protection-clause/#IDComment88076883</link>
<description>You are entirely correct. Once the sex act is severed from procreation, the cat&amp;#039;s out of the bag. To mix metaphors a bit. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/07/09/boston-federal-judge-doma-violate-states-rights-and-equal-protection-clause/#IDComment88076883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Planned Parenthood, St. Louis: Contraception, abortion, and now insemination</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/06/23/planned-parenthood-st-louis-contraception-abortion-and-now-insemination/#IDComment82190824</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s no joke. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/06/23/planned-parenthood-st-louis-contraception-abortion-and-now-insemination/#IDComment82190824</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : National Vital Statistics Report: US fell below replacement rate in 2008</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/06/05/national-vital-statistics-report-us-fell-below-replacement-rate-in-2008/#IDComment79952584</link>
<description>Christian, I believe that you are correct. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/06/05/national-vital-statistics-report-us-fell-below-replacement-rate-in-2008/#IDComment79952584</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Guest blogger: Mr. Norman Teigen, &quot;On Pastor Baker&#039;s Paper&quot;</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/05/13/guest-blogger-mr-norman-teigen-on-pastor-bakers-paper/#IDComment75592094</link>
<description>Thanks, Christian. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 20:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/05/13/guest-blogger-mr-norman-teigen-on-pastor-bakers-paper/#IDComment75592094</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Southern Baptists get it: Declining birthrate = declining membership</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2009/09/20/southern-baptists-get-it-declining-birthrate-declining-membership/#IDComment75034221</link>
<description>Thank you so much for your post. With God&amp;#039;s grace and blessing, let&amp;#039;s encourage folks to reclaim the biblical vision of marriage and family! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2009/09/20/southern-baptists-get-it-declining-birthrate-declining-membership/#IDComment75034221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Imago Dei and Pro-life Lutherans </title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/imago-dei-and-pro-life-lutherans/#IDComment72073692</link>
<description>Thanks, Norman. If there&amp;#039;s something tha I can improve or clarify, please let me know. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 May 2010 15:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/imago-dei-and-pro-life-lutherans/#IDComment72073692</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : Imago Dei and Pro-life Lutherans </title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/imago-dei-and-pro-life-lutherans/#IDComment72047285</link>
<description>Thanks much! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 May 2010 13:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/imago-dei-and-pro-life-lutherans/#IDComment72047285</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : May First Things article on contraception is a must-read</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/04/13/may-first-things-article-on-contraception/#IDComment68384814</link>
<description>Got it! Thanks for the correction, Christian! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/04/13/may-first-things-article-on-contraception/#IDComment68384814</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bioethike : May First Things article on contraception is a must-read</title>
<link>http://bioethike.com/2010/04/13/may-first-things-article-on-contraception/#IDComment68289501</link>
<description>Thanks, Chris! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bioethike.com/2010/04/13/may-first-things-article-on-contraception/#IDComment68289501</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>