en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/566918 Comments by Richard_S_Argent http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/the-search-for-simple-answers#IDComment149842389 If that's the best the "Blame Iggy" crowd can come up with, then I think it's safe to say that Iggy didn't really do anything all that wrong. Sat, 7 May 2011 20:02:25 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/07/the-search-for-simple-answers#IDComment149842389 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at#IDComment149662239 I totally agree. Up the per vote subsidy and ban all donations. Sat, 7 May 2011 04:21:03 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/thats-kind-of-the-sentiment-were-getting-at#IDComment149662239 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment148004250 Sigh....you have no idea about the particulars of this one specific young woman. You don't even know if she was engaged in any nefarious acts - was she charged with anything? And yet you've decided that since she's not proficient in the English language then it's extremely likely that she's a victim of sex trafficking. Mon, 2 May 2011 02:18:58 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment148004250 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment148000342 Of course I never called you a racist prick or even prejudiced. I said you were coming close to making some pretty prejudicial statements. And I stand by that. 'Cause you are. Mon, 2 May 2011 01:57:01 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment148000342 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147996830 That's not an awful lot to cause suspicion/concern then... Mon, 2 May 2011 01:37:44 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147996830 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147995381 That's an awful lot to assume simply based on her proficiency with the English language. Mon, 2 May 2011 01:29:35 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147995381 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147987169 Why would you think that? Solely because she can't speak English very well? I think you're skating very close to making some pretty prejudicial statements here. Mon, 2 May 2011 00:42:24 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147987169 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147970176 Why? If their clientele is predominantly Chinese, why should her difficulty with English be a concern? Sun, 1 May 2011 23:10:35 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/nothing-more-than-a-smear-campaign#IDComment147970176 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/orange-prudence/#IDComment147951422 I suspect you're correct. The NDP have been tacking to the Centre for a little while now, it's just that only recently has anyone paid any attention :) Sun, 1 May 2011 21:32:39 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/orange-prudence/#IDComment147951422 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147940841 Must not ever admit error, eh old boy? Sun, 1 May 2011 20:34:29 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147940841 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147939866 A quick scan of this thread shows me that I answered that particular question of yours 3 times already. We don't have Freedom of Speech in Canada. We have Freedom of Expression. Professional writers ain't professional readers I guess ;) Sun, 1 May 2011 20:28:52 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147939866 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147937756 Utterly incapable of admitting error, even on the most mundane of topics...quel surprise that you adore Harper :D Sun, 1 May 2011 20:18:24 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147937756 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147936001 Actually I was just trying to see if you'd actually admit you were wrong when you so plainly and obviously were.... You didn't disappoint :) Sun, 1 May 2011 20:08:36 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147936001 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147934410 Nope, you used the wrong term. We don't have Freedom of Speech, we have Freedom of Expression. Next. Sun, 1 May 2011 19:58:51 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147934410 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147932738 Then you wanted the incorrect term. Next. Sun, 1 May 2011 19:49:20 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147932738 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147928442 We have Freedom of Expression. Which is even awesomer than Freedom of Speech. If you're such a big supporter of it, then you probably should use the correct term. Sun, 1 May 2011 19:26:44 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147928442 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147926462 Read Sec. 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and tell me where it guarantees "Freedom of Speech". It doesn't. That's what they have in America. We have Freedom of Expression. Sun, 1 May 2011 19:15:04 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147926462 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147925980 Yep, nary a "speech" in sight :) Sun, 1 May 2011 19:12:48 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147925980 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147924970 Funny you live in a country that doesn't promise it then. Sun, 1 May 2011 19:07:15 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147924970 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/new-friends#IDComment147878260 This reads like a transcript of Don Cherry complimenting a French Canadian or a European... Sun, 1 May 2011 15:37:25 +0000 http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/new-friends#IDComment147878260