<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1397852</link>
		<description>Comments by Rep60</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment86344954</link>
<description>Actually, it&amp;#039;s not Medieval at all....  But to the point, I find it interesting that you choose Christianity as your protagonist.  Of the major religions, can you find one more tolerant?   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment86344954</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment86343882</link>
<description>Because calling it marriage would be forcing their views on a group that rejects gay marriage. I&amp;#039;m starting to think that you&amp;#039;re not interested in equality, but more interested in the destruction of a religious institution. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment86343882</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Old-Earth.info : Ancient Megalithic Stone Circles in... Massachusetts?</title>
<link>http://www.old-earth.info/?p=189#IDComment86193302</link>
<description>I love the article, but I believe that Mystery Hill is located in Salem, NH.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stonehengeusa.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.stonehengeusa.com/&lt;/a&gt;  I&amp;#039;ve read America B.C. by the late Barry Fell and it&amp;#039;s an outstanding book that focuses on this subject. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 01:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.old-earth.info/?p=189#IDComment86193302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85810220</link>
<description>Yet you can&amp;#039;t proclaim tyranny of the majority to forward an agenda that many believe is criminal.  Take abortion as an example.  Do you want partial birth abortion legal so that the unreasonable minority of people who support it are protected?  Where do you draw the line?  When are the majority protected? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85810220</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Science Czar John Holdren on Redistribution of Cap &amp; Trade Revenue From U.S. to Global South</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85705353</link>
<description>We won&amp;#039;t.  I think that in the end, we&amp;#039;ll have a card up our sleeve. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85705353</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Science Czar John Holdren on Redistribution of Cap &amp; Trade Revenue From U.S. to Global South</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704941</link>
<description>November can&amp;#039;t get here fast enough.  Let&amp;#039;s just hope that the GOP uses all of its power to recind this agenda. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704941</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Science Czar John Holdren on Redistribution of Cap &amp; Trade Revenue From U.S. to Global South</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704492</link>
<description>Probably during their riots in the 60&amp;#039;s.  Now it&amp;#039;s a haven for vipers of all kinds.. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704492</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama Science Czar John Holdren on Redistribution of Cap &amp; Trade Revenue From U.S. to Global South</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704082</link>
<description>Now that it&amp;#039;s proven that the only warming was in Al Gore&amp;#039;s pants, lets get on with the business of trashing cap and trade.  Why is the US president so intent on liquidating the collective wealth of the U.S.? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-science-czar-john-holdren-on-redistribution-of-cap-trade-revenue-from-u-s-to-global-south/#IDComment85704082</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Court rejects bid to restore drilling moratorium</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR6BD80&show_article=1#IDComment85700653</link>
<description>&amp;quot;The federal government not being able to do its job is not a reason for thousands of Louisianians to lose their jobs,&amp;quot; Jindal said.   Well said!  I can&amp;#039;t help but feel that Obama is trying to cripple any presidential aspirations that Jindal may have.  This is who Obama is to me - someone who puts his personal interests before his countries. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR6BD80&show_article=1#IDComment85700653</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85698542</link>
<description>I disagree.  I think it&amp;#039;s the other way around.  States rights is an argument when it favors the left.  Roe v. Wade comes to mind.  Healthcare comes to mind.   Why is it that the left must use the courts instead of the electorate to further their cause? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85698542</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama attacks Reid\&#039;s Senate opponent</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR8OFO1&show_article=1#IDComment85697642</link>
<description>Said Obama: &amp;quot;She favors an approach that&amp;#039;s even more extreme than the Republicans we&amp;#039;ve got in Washington.  That&amp;#039;s saying something.&amp;quot;   I wonder what is so extreme?  Adhering to the Constitution?  Lowering taxes?  What heretics! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR8OFO1&show_article=1#IDComment85697642</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : LeBron James makes his pick: He\&#039;s going to Miami</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR7NU00&show_article=1#IDComment85696795</link>
<description>You have to feel for the City of Cleveland.  I think that LeBron bailed out and has taken the easy road.  He&amp;#039;ll win the championship, but it will be D-Wades terms and not his.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR7NU00&show_article=1#IDComment85696795</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama: Choice between moving ahead or back</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR39L01&show_article=1#IDComment85694755</link>
<description>Seems like forever.  I&amp;#039;m afraid that his useful idiots at NBC, CBS and ABC will help him in his perpetual campaign endeavors. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR39L01&show_article=1#IDComment85694755</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama: Choice between moving ahead or back</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR39L01&show_article=1#IDComment85694206</link>
<description>Great post.  November means the end of Chicago-style thuggery.... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR39L01&show_article=1#IDComment85694206</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85693507</link>
<description>There is some solace in the fact the the Supreme Court has a conservative majority and can undo some of the madness that Obama has created. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85693507</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85690402</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re missing the point - no one cares what a gay couple is doing - as long as you don&amp;#039;t try to impose your values on the overwhelming majority that doesn&amp;#039;t want any part of it.  Marriage is a sacrament.  If you want to live together, do it, but don&amp;#039;t call it marriage.  We value that tradition as a bond between a man and a woman.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85690402</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85689546</link>
<description>From wikipedia:  One of the oldest known and recorded marriage laws is discerned from Hammurabi&amp;#039;s Code, enacted in ancient Mesopotamia (widely considered as the cradle of civilization).   &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage#History&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage#History&lt;/a&gt;  So, the cradle of civiliaztion deems marriage between a man and a woman.  English common law deems marriage between a man and a woman.    For most reasonable folks, marriage between a man and a woman is a foregone conclusion.  Man on man, woman on woman is anything but marriage. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85689546</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85684539</link>
<description>Even some religious sects have become politically active.  It&amp;#039;s like pedophiles infiltrating the Catholic Church - it&amp;#039;s not the message of the Church but some criminals operating under a guise... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85684539</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85669067</link>
<description>I agree, it should come down to States Rights.  Time to shrink the Federal Government and give the country back to the States. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85669067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Federal gay marriage ban is ruled unconstitutional</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85662286</link>
<description>As long as the relationship is between two consenting mature adults, the gender is irrelevant.  True, but you&amp;#039;re arguing about extending a religious sacrament to homosexuals.  Marriage is a sacrament.  Go have a union. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Jul 2010 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GR5S380&show_article=1#IDComment85662286</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>