en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/357341 Comments by Regulaguy http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/13/41409-canadian-websites-say-that-tea-parties-are-being-inflitrated/#IDComment18801969 Betsy: You have no idea how much I appreciate that! Give 'em hell for me! Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:53:36 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/13/41409-canadian-websites-say-that-tea-parties-are-being-inflitrated/#IDComment18801969 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/13/41409-canadian-websites-say-that-tea-parties-are-being-inflitrated/#IDComment18798045 I knew something was bothering me, but I just couldn't figure out what it was.... Early this morning I woke in the dark knowing, finally, just what it was... The "Big Picture" that everyone talks about must have been painted by Picasso... I want to go to a "TEA party" so badly I can taste it. As a "damaged" veteran (I dislike the term disabled) I just can't make it. I would greatly appreciate it if someone would let them know that I was there in spirit if not in corpus... Thanks, Reg. Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:26:27 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/13/41409-canadian-websites-say-that-tea-parties-are-being-inflitrated/#IDComment18798045 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17402559 I think I love you! I saw a march once when I was a kid... No one made a sound. All you could hear was the sound of feet moving up the road... It was like the end of the world. It was VERY scary and VERY impressive... Effective too! Wonderful idea! Count me in! Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:37:11 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17402559 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17399690 I hesitate to lend any credence to your "post" by replying to it, but I think one thing should be made clear... President Bush was hamstrung by a congress controlled by self-serving, partisan, democrat jerks that did nothing for years but try to make themselves look good to the media by trying to make the him look like an idiot so that they could accomplish their main goal... Not the one we elected them for, but their MAIN goal... Get re-elected. Don't tell me that President Bush "couldn't do anything"... Remember that he was prevented from doing anything at every turn. Now you have a "president" that can "do-no-wrong"... Let's just see how well that works out. So far, I’d say it hasn’t been a very good start. Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:02:39 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17399690 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17398934 Continued: I had no objection to Sarah Palin either. She is smart, savvy, and has enough experience to do the job and do it well. The brutality that she experienced at the hands of the liberal "talking heads" and garbage like "Saturday Night Live" and "The View" should have told all that she was feared and reviled by the leftists and their lap-dog media for good reason. The idiot that sits in the catbird seat now seems to be nothing more than a puppet with numerous other idiots jerking his strings. He has surely done a "wonderful" job so far... Of being an expensive suit with a speech in it. To any Liberals out there who care to read this, I'll say this: I'll give your "president" the same respect that you showed mine. Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:45:32 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17398934 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17398907 Actually, from what I hear from some folks in DC, Powell was very upset that he wasn't offered the VP spot on the Republican ticket... As a vet, I too would have seriously considered voting for him as I respected his stated views on a lot of subjects. His sudden turn around rather shocked me until I was told about his reaction to not being included on the ticket. Had Condoleezza Rice been the selectee I would have had absolutely no objection to her being VP. She has a head on her shoulders and, I think, the best interests of the country at heart. At least she has some idea about how to lead a country. Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:44:24 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=533#IDComment17398907 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17243532 Where in the sweet world did you get that little piece of uh, information? You really need to look at the reports of what really happened and quit listening to Rosie. Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:16:22 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17243532 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17243266 Is that why, when I go to the V.A. they send a bill to my private insurance company? Gee... I was wondering about that. Bet if you ask around a lot of us vets have received bills from our private insurance for services we received at the V.A. Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:09:16 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17243266 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17242698 Any attempt to prevent citizens from having the ability to defend themselves from criminal activity or political tyranny is a violation of the letter and spirit of the very document that establishes the laws under which we live, the document that should ensure our freedoms as Americans. Please do not think of it as "ammending" the Constitution. It was written into the Bill of Rights to make it much more difficult to "interpret" in any other way than the way it was written, and even more difficult to change or infringe upon. It is less difficult to add an ammendment than it is to remove or re-write one. That is why it was done the way it was. An armed man is a citizen; a disarmed man is a slave. Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:53:43 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17242698 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17242401 If I may add my two cents worth here... Article II of The Bill Of Rights of The Constitution was written as a protection for all of the other rights enumerated there. The founding fathers of this nation were very familiar with tyrannical governments and local officials that chose the laws that they followed and those that they did not, and were able, because the general populace was unarmed, to do as they wished without the worry of some armed citizen standing up for himself and his family and putting a stop to it. Robbery, rape and murder were very common. THe "law" took what it wanted, when it wanted without any concern for consequences. The framers of our Constitution decided, wisely I think, that citizens must be able to defend themselves from criminal activity committed by either side of the law. They were right. Nothing has changed in the two hundred plus years that this nation has existed. There are still people on both sides of the law that engage in criminal activity. Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:46:45 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17242401 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17202604 Does "opaque" sum it up? Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:59:19 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17202604 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17200843 And another thing...! I get so po'd when I hear the term "assault weapon". There isn't a single solitary media talking head out there that can (or will) accurately define the term "assault weapon" anywhere! When will someone have the brass (no pun) to get the message out in "prime time" that there is a huge difference between a semi-automatic firearm and an "assault weapon"? Hey, GB, what about you? Wanna take a whack at it? Get out there on your show and tackle the term "assault weapon" vs. semi-automatic. Spend just five minutes on the subject... There are, believe it or not, a goodly number of pro-Article II folks out there who don't know the difference. Maybe if just one person can explain to a friend what the difference is we could get a movement started. A "Tell-the-Truth" movement aimed (again, no pun) at the mainstream media. Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:10:07 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17200843 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17198965 OK... This is going to upset somebody, but I would rather fly with a load of armed passengers and an armed pilot or two, than trust to luck that "the TSA" (what a joke) catches some Bozo with his box cutter. I flew KC-135's in the Air Force for many years and you can bet your obama that we were armed! BTW... I never heard of a single instance of a round being discharged accidentally or deliberately EVER on any of our military aircraft. But I do know of a few times that the threat of force was used on unruly passengers. Worked pretty well too! This post appears twice... My fault. My ISP tricked me. I apologize.... Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:18:55 +0000 http://www.the912project.com/2009/03/18/obama-secretly-ends-program-that-let-pilots-carry-guns/#IDComment17198965 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17148122 It never seems to occur to anyone that if someone else on that bus (or whatever) had been armed, it might have been the gangsters that got what was comming to them and not some innocent person. It may sound strange to some, but I would rather fly on an aircraft that was full of armed passengers than a load of sheep ready for slaughter. It makes my teeth hurt when I have to stow my legally carried firearm when I go places that I know that I (and others) would be (and are) vulnerable to attack. When I read a story about some nutcase who shoots up a church, school or town someplace, I know that people who want to disarm me and the rest of you right along with me, are reading the same thing and rubbing their hands together and smiling. More ammo for them... Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:03:42 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17148122 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17147282 Hey Bob... In London England a man was arrested in a "tube station" for carrying knives. They were in a box, so they were "concealed"... It was a set of kitchen knives he was taking home to his wife for a gift! You can look for that in New York state any day now... Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:51:32 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17147282 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17144993 Because the SOBs that write these bills DON'T WANT you to know what's going on under your nose! And the "media" (I think that should become a 'dirty word') goes right along with them! I had not heard of HR 45 until I saw it in my gun club's news letter. My jaw hit the floor... I live in Georgia, a "right to carry" state. When GB talked about gun bans on his show he never mentioned HR 45. Glen, what were you thinking? I have yet to hear a single word mentioned about HR 45 in ANY media outlet... Does that tell you anything? Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:34:38 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17144993 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17110190 I about choked on my re-loader when I read about HR 45. At first I thought it was something they cooked up here in Georgia... But I guess not. I'm retired military, and as such I took an oath to defend the Cons***ution of The United Stated against all enemies foreign and domestic... Good lord, I don't know anymore where to start defending , or against whom! I watched GB last Friday and had almost as many tears as he had. I’m getting scared that soon there will be no more “Right to”… Anything! BTW, I stopped saying “Second Amendment” a long time ago… As far as I’m concerned it’s Article II of the Bill Of Rights! I would sincerely hope that more folks would think of it that way. Reg. P.S. Why is the website editing the spelling of "Constitution"? Isn't that going just a teeny bit too far? R Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:29:20 +0000 http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/03/13/bonus-video/#IDComment17110190