<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/328132</link>
		<description>Comments by Reginald</description>
<item>
<title>GearCrave : 5 Video Game Franchises That Need to Die (and 5 to Replace Them)</title>
<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-17/5-worst-video-games/#IDComment15409408</link>
<description>i love Halo and Zelda and i would hate to see them go, but i smell what you&amp;#039;re steppin in when it comes to F-Zero. I used to play Mario Kart when it was on the Super NES, i&amp;#039;ve had a distaste for it since then. I think all you guys who said that the article was bad need to re-think you opinion. I&amp;#039;ve set back and watched the gaming industry milk certain franchises until they were DEAD, and then tried to bring them back only to have another EPIC FAIL! I would like to see a better Zelda come out, and i&amp;#039;m fine with just remembering about Halo, i&amp;#039;m pretty stoked about Halo Wars (i&amp;#039;m a huge RTS fan) but i wish it was on the comp instead of on the 360 (super lame). If people in the gaming industry thought outside the box like these guys we would see a whole lot more of games, plus the ones we love because times between releases wouldn&amp;#039;t be less than one year. We would have a shit ton more of games that are all fun. I&amp;#039;m sick of mediocre games released before they were done (perfect example of this, play the last two levels of Halo 2. It screams having to be rushed)  all in all i give the article an 8 out of 10. Mostly because Doom has already been made and we know the industry will just destroy it again. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-17/5-worst-video-games/#IDComment15409408</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>