<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1470939</link>
		<description>Comments by Refudiater</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Chris Wallace: &#039;I Hope the President Doesn&#039;t Speak With Her&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/chris-wallace-i-hope-the-president-doesnt-speak-with-her/#IDComment88121254</link>
<description>Why shouldn&amp;#039;t Obama speak to her?  Honestly, these right-wing media types are so twisted and contrarian.  If Obama had said he has no plans of speaking to her, you can bet Faux News and their ilk would be DEMANDING he speak to her.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/chris-wallace-i-hope-the-president-doesnt-speak-with-her/#IDComment88121254</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Breitbart Didn&#039;t Hide Sherrod&#039;s Redemption and Other Things the Media&#039;s Gotten Wrong So Far</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment88120466</link>
<description>So this writer can point out all the ways in which others overreacted to this out of context video, but he conveniently fails to touch on the biggest issue - Bretbart&amp;#039;s lies in an attempt to defame a decent woman.  How can anyone stick up for that?  Whether you&amp;#039;re a right-wing extremist or good, liberal American, there&amp;#039;s no place for this kind of disgusting behavior.  What is BB trying to prove?  That he&amp;#039;s a master of the lowest common denominator?  He&amp;#039;s already proven that time and time again. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/gbenson/2010/07/21/breitbart-didnt-hide-sherrods-redemption-and-other-things-the-medias-gotten-wrong-so-far/#IDComment88120466</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>