<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/714239</link>
		<description>Comments by Randy_Rowland</description>
<item>
<title>Moving Locals : Segways on the Burlington Bike Path?</title>
<link>http://www.localmotion.org/blog/2009/11/segways-on-the-burl-bike-path/#IDComment43747111</link>
<description>Motorized devices do not belong on the bike path. Possible exception: those who are mobility challenged might be allowed to enjoy the path with the aid of a Segway. How you certify someone is &amp;quot;mobility challenged&amp;quot; then becomes the issue. The path was never intended to allow those with a fair degree of mobility to use anything other than their own power to enjoy the path.  otherwise it would have been called a &amp;quot;recreational trail&amp;quot;, not a bike path. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.localmotion.org/blog/2009/11/segways-on-the-burl-bike-path/#IDComment43747111</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>