<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/471238</link>
		<description>Comments by Rosario T. Calabria</description>
<item>
<title>Your Entertainment Now : Fox Won&#039;t Air President Obama&#039;s Third News Conference</title>
<link>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/28/fox-wont-air-president-obamas-third-news-conference/#IDComment20178525</link>
<description>Well, I tried to leave the political talk out of the post, but whatever.  Let me get my two cents in real quick.  In regards to your &lt;em&gt;complaint&lt;/em&gt; about our president getting too much press: Good, he&amp;#039;s our president and SHOULD be out in front of the public as much as possible.  And I&amp;#039;ll remind you that the public overwhelmingly agrees with me.  A recent AP poll showed that a whopping 69% believe President Obama is on TV too little or just the right amount.  Only 28% said too much.  Which, by the way, is about how many Americans identify themselves as Republicans.  Coincidence?  I think not.  And on a parting note, I&amp;#039;d say it&amp;#039;s quite ironic that Fox Broadcasting, under the same umbrella as Fox News, happens to air a show called Lie to Me, something they&amp;#039;re very good at over at Fox News. ;) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/28/fox-wont-air-president-obamas-third-news-conference/#IDComment20178525</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Your Entertainment Now : Good Chance Chuck Will Be Renewed For Third Season</title>
<link>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/27/good-chance-chuck-will-be-renewed-for-third-season/#IDComment20107150</link>
<description>Take note, it &lt;em&gt;look&amp;#039;s&lt;/em&gt; like it&amp;#039;ll be renewed.  No decision has been made yet. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/27/good-chance-chuck-will-be-renewed-for-third-season/#IDComment20107150</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Your Entertainment Now : Broadcast TV Ratings for Sunday, April 12, 2009</title>
<link>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/13/broadcast-tv-ratings-for-sunday-april-12-2009/#IDComment18790311</link>
<description>Andr&amp;eacute;s The finals are now in, along with the week-to-week/episode-to-episode comparisons. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/13/broadcast-tv-ratings-for-sunday-april-12-2009/#IDComment18790311</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Your Entertainment Now : NBC Moves Kings to Saturday</title>
<link>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/07/nbc-moves-kings-to-saturday/#IDComment18366452</link>
<description>Well I never said they didn&amp;#039;t promote the show, only that I don&amp;#039;t believe they promoted it well (a problem that exists network-wide, as you noted).      There&amp;#039;s a difference.      They could have pushed up the premiere, or they could have simply done a better job at generating buzz.  When it premiered, there was nearly no buzz.  I mean, the premiere drew just 6.08M viewers and a 1.6 A18-49 rating.      It was never properly sampled, so in a way, it was never even given a &lt;em&gt;chance&lt;/em&gt; to fail. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://yourentertainmentnow.com/2009/04/07/nbc-moves-kings-to-saturday/#IDComment18366452</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>