I agree with the general thrust of the article and see the EUSSR as the biggest threat to our ancient rights and freedoms since 1939, but I disagree with the over-emphasis on the menace of islam.

Of course, rampant, nakedly agressive, islam is a major danger to our democracy, but the hidden and, therefore, more insidious hazard is that of zionism, which has already spread its ugly tentacles throughout the whole world.

David Morris needs to look at the shadowy figures who are behind EVERY piece of "race relations" legislation (as well as the New World Order project) not only in the UK but most other countries in the Western World - and they are not fanatical islamists!

The islamists currently have plenty of money, due to the Western World's development of the oilfields in the Middle East, but they still have the mindset of their medieval and backward cult. If the oil stops flowing, so will the money, and the cultists will revert to type - sinking back into the Middle Ages.

The zionists, on the other hand, already have an entrenched position within our society (in many instances hidden from view) and will continue to aggrandise themselves and to mold us into unthinking drones in their pathological quest for world dominance over the 'goyim'.

We, as true Nationalists, have to confront both these monsters head on and not shy away from stating loud and clear, "A plague on both their houses!"

As for events that occurred seven decades ago, they have no relevance to our political fight and we Nationalists should not allow ourselves to get drawn into these fruitless and pointless academic discussions. Many people of all political, national and religious persuausions died in the Second World War, and no one group has a monoply over this suffering on a mass scale. In a truly democratic society there should be room for all divergences of thought, without any subject being anathema or subject to the forces of the law. "Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it." Pericles

As usual with most figures involving money, that emanate from HQ, they don't add up!

15 months at an average of £26,330 per month = £394,950. Yet according to the new math of the BNP it actually totals £359,000 - a difference of £45,950.

However, if one takes the £394,950 and deducts the 'average monthly running costs' (15 x £8,000 = £120,000) we arrive at a 'direct profit' of £274,950. A difference of £51,950 on the 'direct profit of £223,000 as quoted in the article on the BNP website.

I am sure that £51,950 is a mere bagatelle to Messrs Griffin and Dowson, but to the ordinary members such as Gwynneth B and thousands of others like her, it will represent a small fortune.

The fact that the current hierarchy of the Party is so cavalier with financial matters (not to mention the truth) is proof enough that their is a major probity deficit in the BNP and that the time for change is NOW!

Having viewed parts of the video on the new election campaign strategy, I have to say that I am singularly unimpressed with the quality of our in-house "experts" and I rather suspect, with all due humility, that my view may also be one that would be shared by the electorate. As far as our opponents are concerned, I can already hear the howls of hysterical laughter.

It may have escaped that attention of the Party election gurus, but the Lib/Lab/CONS used the techniques now being advocated by Griffin and Dowson during the recent GE campaign - and look where it got them!

You can use the most sophisticated electioneering systems known to man, but if great chunks of the populace are switched off to politics and feel disenfranchised from the process you aint going to get them to vote for you or, indeed, anyone. In the UK, those that can be asked to exercise their democratic rights, will generally tend to be tribal, or very conservative, in their political allegiance and small parties consequently need to move mountains to change the received opinion of the average, politically naive, voter.

Manxman does make a useful contribution to this debate by suggesting Andrew Moffat as a possible suitable candidate for the role of Party Leader.

I have known Andrew for quite some time and can vouch for the facts that he is ideologically sound; politically astute; totally dedicated to our great Cause; very articulate both orally and in writing; well-educated; is charismatic and personable; has considerable business acumen and, most importantly, is an honourable man. Additionally he looks the part (neither too old, nor too young) and would bring a wealth of practical experience to the role of Leader of the BNP.

At the moment, not too many members will be aware of Andrew's capabilities, but I am sure that will improve rapidly as time passes and if he can be persuaded to throw his hat into the ring!

Out of all the people that I have considered (including all the 'usual suspects') to fill this role, Andrew in my mind wins by a country mile!

Sorry forgot to add - PLUS 99% of the comments on the Lancaster site are written ("anonymously" of course) by the brainless losers that run it.

Keep up the good work guys - don't always agree with everything on here (that's democracy for you), but still proud to stand as a Nationalist Comrade in the Shieldwall with you all.

Happy Christmas/Merry Yuletide to all at GA and fellow Nationalists everywhere.

GA - you're doing yourselves down, mate!

Your actual ranking today in the UK is 4,969. Well done you guys.

But more interestingly, the pageviews per visitor to GA is a very credible 7.4 (7 days average), compared to say 1.3 for the Lancaster cesspit. Obviously, the average attention span of the pondlife that might somehow slime their way to the red shite site IS directly comparable to that of an amoeba! LOL!

EnochP - the Chief Executive for Selly Oak Hospital is Julie Moore and if you try Julie.Moore@uhb.nhs.uk I think that will probably get to her. Alternatively, the Director of Communications' email is Fiona.Alexander@uhb.nhs.uk

Hope that helps - if we all email them and politely express our disgust at their politically motivated decision and let them know they will not be getting any donated organs from BNP members, perhaps they will start to wake up (although I won't be holding my breath).

Now you've gone and done it, Nick! It'll be all over the media; the fanatical numpties of the left will be screaming from the rooftops (no change there); the establishment quislings will speak with one voice of condemnation -

"Griffin and the BNP are 'deniers' - we were right all along!"

Most normal people, with their feet on the ground and their eyes fully open to the deviousness of the liberal fascist elite, will be saying: "Well done, sir, another brilliant little speech against the global warming scam!"

Nothing to do with this story, but hot off the press: "The British National Party (BNP) has joined forces with far-right groups in a new European Alliance of National Movements. The movement will not be recognised as a political bloc in the European Parliament, but it might receive EU funding as a pan-European grouping. BNP leader Nick Griffin - one of two Euro MPs from the party - said the funding would be 11m euros (£10m). French and Hungarian nationalists are heading the alliance with the BNP."

Full story http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8356284.s...

Off topic, just a little bit, and I'm sure you are probably aware but your site, GA, is streets ahead of the Lancaster swampspot, according to Alexa:

GA - 443,281 Worldwide; 14,128 UK; page views per user 3.3

Lancaster swamp - 568,060 Worldwide; 29,353 UK; page views per user 1.3 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA obviously their visitors find the swamp so mind-numbingly boring they just drop off, or perhaps there aren't enough pictures for them ;)

The NUJ's "cunning brainwashing plan" doesn't seem to be working. Oh dear, how sad!