<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/494884</link>
		<description>Comments by Pyrran</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : In the Bowels of Baltimore’s ACORN</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/hgiles/2009/09/10/in-the-bowels-of-baltimores-acorn/#IDComment33940444</link>
<description>Why do I have a feeling that the Department of &amp;quot;Justice&amp;quot; will not prosecute these two pieces of filth? Why do I have a feeling that the &amp;quot;mainstream&amp;quot; media will ignore this completely until it is pushed in their faces?  words fail me </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 04:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/hgiles/2009/09/10/in-the-bowels-of-baltimores-acorn/#IDComment33940444</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : America&#039;s Wish List</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373911</link>
<description>1. Secure borders against drug dealers and terrorists 2. Increase defense spending on military-F22 and F35 (parts for F22 are made in 44 states) 3. Term limits for legislators, no re-elections for 6 years 4. No money for campaigns from lobbyists, no jobs after service for 5 years 5. Constitutional studies mandatory in middle school 6.  Construction of &amp;quot;pebble bed&amp;quot; nuclear reactors for electrical power </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373911</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : America&#039;s Wish List</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373706</link>
<description>Write your comment here... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373706</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : America&#039;s Wish List</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373329</link>
<description>I would agree with everything in your post except number 2 and not for the reason you expect.  I asked a Constitutional lawyer about this and he told me that, if we pass a law making English the national language, it could be defeated in court.  As it is now, the opponents of English have no way to fight it in court. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : America&#039;s Wish List</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373186</link>
<description>I think the idea is to go back to a time when being a Senator or Congressman was a service to one&amp;#039;s country and not a career.  Once it bacame a career, the politician&amp;#039;s only real aim is to continue to get re-elected.  Like you, I can see the problems of term limits.  The only other possible solution would be to completely cut off lobbying money, campaign contributions, and cushy jobs received as a result of favorable legislation.  That being said, if we wait for a perfect plan, we will wait forever and the situation will continue to worsen. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/?page_id=820#IDComment18373186</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : Obama: U.S. Not at War With Islam</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/obama-us-not-at-war-with-islam/#IDComment18371912</link>
<description>I remember a line from a movie that sorta says it. &amp;quot;You took an oath, if you recall, when you first came to work for me. And I don&amp;#039;t mean to the National Security Advisor of the United States, I mean to his boss... and I don&amp;#039;t mean the President. You gave your word to his boss: you gave your word to the people of the United States. Your word is who you are.&amp;quot;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/obama-us-not-at-war-with-islam/#IDComment18371912</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : The Secretary of Defense Wants To Overhaul Weapons Spending, Congress Freaks</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18371692</link>
<description>Good post.  I&amp;#039;m sitting here thinking, if Gate&amp;#039;s rationale for cutting the F22 is that it is not needed because we will be fighting terrorists, not armies, why would the same rationale not hold for missile defense?  I am far more worried about Iran with an intercontinental EMP than I am about Putin launching WW3. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18371692</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : The Secretary of Defense Wants To Overhaul Weapons Spending, Congress Freaks</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18371440</link>
<description>might want to read this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18371440</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : The Secretary of Defense Wants To Overhaul Weapons Spending, Congress Freaks</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18370883</link>
<description>Isn&amp;#039;t the F35 a multirole fighter?  I would assume it&amp;#039;s meant to replace the F16 NATO forces.  I know that there are over 500 F18 fighters in service right now and I am wondering what will replace them?  By the way, here is a good article on the F22.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18370883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Glenn Beck - The 912 Project : The Secretary of Defense Wants To Overhaul Weapons Spending, Congress Freaks</title>
<link>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18370459</link>
<description>There is an excellent article in Atlantic Monthly that covers this subject pretty well. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200903/air-force&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://theglennbeck912project.com/2009/04/07/the-secretary-of-defense-wants-to-overhaul-weapons-spending-congress-freaks/#IDComment18370459</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>