<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/282304</link>
		<description>Comments by Pancake</description>
<item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Moratorium issued on Capitol displays, exhibits | KOMO News - Seattle, Washington | News</title>
<link>http://dev.www.komonews.com/news/36087084.html#IDComment12535933</link>
<description>Oh please.  You could make that argument if someone wanted to ban churches, but displays on public property?  The government is a secular entity and by allowing ANY displays it must allow ALL displays to avoid the impression of endorsing any a religion.    If churches, private homeowners, private business-owners, etc. wish to display religious symbols on their property, that is their right.  There are hundreds of churches out there... why do they need a display at the Capitol?    The most amusing part of this is that the protesters are giving the atheists more publicity and opportunity to voice their view than they could have ever wanted!  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://dev.www.komonews.com/news/36087084.html#IDComment12535933</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>