PS137

PS137

68p

40 comments posted · 2 followers · following 0

291 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Fraudulently Elected: ... · 6 replies · +5 points

No President or President elect has ever been presented to the US Constitution as you have suggested.

President Elects are presented to a joint session of Congresss and if there is no objection to the President elect being transformed to US President the President elect becomes the lawful President of the US.

There is no provision in US election laws for a President to be presented to the Constitution or to any other documents

Also, fo your edification documents such as the Constitution are not living beings and as such documents are not aware that anything is being presented to them and rational sane people are not deluded into thinking that the documents have such awareness.

291 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Fraudulently Elected: ... · 3 replies · +4 points

QUESTION – It seems that every time a court rules that you do not have to be born on US soil to two citizen parents a Birther brings up Minor v. Happersett and says that any decision that says that you do not have to be born on US soil to two citizen parents to be a NBC is in conflict with Minor

The reason that this is so confusing to most people is because despite combing through the Minor decision with a legal fine tooth comb, no legal scholar or layman has ever been able to find anything in the Minor decision that says that you have to be born on US soil to two citizen parents to be a NBC. In fact, when talking about whether US Citizenship of parents is required for NBC the Minor Court states that it will not address the subject.

Here is the on point decision that all US courts currently defer to when the question of whether being born on US soil to two US parents is necessary for NBC. It was rendered by the Indiana Court of appeals and has been upheld by every subsequent court-

“"[b]ased upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."

As we all know, the Minor Court acknowledged that people who are born on US soil to two Citizen parents are NBCs, however, no court is advising, hinting or ruling that people born on US soil to two Citizen parents are not NBCs so where is the conflict with Minor that many Birthers say exist in rulings that say that being born on US soil to two citizen parents is not the only way that a person can be a NBC?

291 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Fraudulently Elected: ... · 1 reply · +8 points

No one ever said that there is nothing political about Presidents replacing and/or hand picking the high ranking officers of their choice during a Presidents term in office as commander in chief of the military.

If a President did not carefully decide who the higher ranking officers would be by considering compentency and loyalty to the sitting President, that would be quite foolish indeed.

For example- suppose Obama or any other President for that matter did not pick officers in part due to political considerations? What would have happened if Obama had not thououghly investigated officer candidates political leanings and inadvertently picked Birthers as high ranking Military Officers?

Don’t you think that if he would have allowed Birthers to be among the high ranking officers that he would possibly be at risk of one or more of those officers causing disent in the ranks and perhaps even a military revolt against him?

291 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Fraudulently Elected: ... · 11 replies · +13 points

Simple, Because most if not all High ranking Military Officers do not claim to be constitutional scholars (like a lot of people on this site claim to be), they have no idea of your interpretation of what is and what is not unconstitutional and do not want to to be court martialed,dishonorably discharged and thrown into federal prison for listening to a bunch of nut cases who have never stepped foot in a law school, never took a constitutional law class, have no specialized training in Military Law and who generally speaking have no idea whatsoever of what they are talking about when it comes to US Law and/or the US Constitution.

292 weeks ago @ Birther Report - NSFW: Birther Report P... · 2 replies · +9 points

The reason that Trump will never challege Cruz or Ruibio’s eligibilty during his Presidential Campaign is –
Because if Trump were to officially and publically challege any cadidate’s eligibility it would immediatly cause the whole Birther thing about Obama to become front and center in the major media 24/7 and Trump would then be forced to either admit that he is still a Birther and face the ridicule or publically denounce Birthers and lose the Birther vote.

292 weeks ago @ Birther Report - NSFW: Birther Report P... · 10 replies · +11 points

. My friend, if people truly believed in the Birther stuff instead of believing it is a wacko conspiracy theory(like most people do), talking about the Birther issue would not denegrade Trump it would be a campaign assett instead of the embarressment that he wants to avoid.

292 weeks ago @ Birther Report - NSFW: Birther Report P... · 10 replies · +10 points

In response to claims against Obama Congress looked to Hawaii to see if Obama has a valid BC and Hawaii said yes. They looked to the Administration of Social Security to see if Obama had a valid SS number and the SS Administration said yes. They looked to Selective Service to see if Obama had properly registered for Selective Service and the Selective Service Board said yes and they looked to Article III courts as well as Congresssional atttorneys to see if Obama was eligible to be President and they all said yes.

Congress has definitely done it’s job as far as investigating Obama is concerned and then some.

292 weeks ago @ Birther Report - NSFW: Birther Report P... · 13 replies · +15 points

Trump has repeatedly and emphatically told eveyone concerned that he is no longer interested in the Birther issue, that he is way past it, no longer interested in it and that he wants nothing to do with it, however, no one seems to want to believe him. The more sincere he gets when he says he is no longer interested in the Birther issue the more some feel the need to say that he is lying and merely biding his time and that if only he could be elected he will all of a sudden reveal that he is interested in the Birther issue and will launch some kind of investigation when nothing could be further from the truth.

It kind of sounds like when people were saying that Zullo and Joe were merely waiting for the right time to release their gut wrenching Universe Shattering information.

The funny part is that when people lie about having Universe Shattering information which they just cannot release at this time blah, blah, people believe that lie for years but when someone like Trump is being sincere in saying that he wants nothing to do with the Birther issue, no one wants to believe him.

Go figure.

293 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Video: NBC News Birthe... · 0 replies · +4 points

Wrong my friend, it is not always darkest before the light. That's just something people say to comfort themselves when things are not going well for them.

The truth is, it is always darkest just before it turns pitch black.

293 weeks ago @ Birther Report - Listen Live: Washingto... · 0 replies · +6 points

If you notice, Strunk points out in his posting on the last thread that the US District Court is already of the opinion that the US Supreme Court will deny Stunk a hearing and dismiss his case.

Strunk points out that the US District Court orders him to –

“....[S]chedule for the resolution of the merits of this case, within 21 days after the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari of the pending appeal”. (Strunk will most likely delete this post however if he does you will see where he deleted it).

The act of the US Supreme Court dismissing his case and denying him a hearing means that the US Supreme Court is satisfied that theTrial Court acted properly in dismissing his case in the first place and since the US District Court already anticipates dismissil by the US Supreme Court there is no doubt that the US District Court will agree with the Trial Court and the US Supreme Court and will also dismiss Strunk’s case.