40 comments posted · 2 followers · following 0
President Elects are presented to a joint session of Congresss and if there is no objection to the President elect being transformed to US President the President elect becomes the lawful President of the US.
There is no provision in US election laws for a President to be presented to the Constitution or to any other documents
Also, fo your edification documents such as the Constitution are not living beings and as such documents are not aware that anything is being presented to them and rational sane people are not deluded into thinking that the documents have such awareness.
The reason that this is so confusing to most people is because despite combing through the Minor decision with a legal fine tooth comb, no legal scholar or layman has ever been able to find anything in the Minor decision that says that you have to be born on US soil to two citizen parents to be a NBC. In fact, when talking about whether US Citizenship of parents is required for NBC the Minor Court states that it will not address the subject.
Here is the on point decision that all US courts currently defer to when the question of whether being born on US soil to two US parents is necessary for NBC. It was rendered by the Indiana Court of appeals and has been upheld by every subsequent court-
“"[b]ased upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
As we all know, the Minor Court acknowledged that people who are born on US soil to two Citizen parents are NBCs, however, no court is advising, hinting or ruling that people born on US soil to two Citizen parents are not NBCs so where is the conflict with Minor that many Birthers say exist in rulings that say that being born on US soil to two citizen parents is not the only way that a person can be a NBC?
If a President did not carefully decide who the higher ranking officers would be by considering compentency and loyalty to the sitting President, that would be quite foolish indeed.
For example- suppose Obama or any other President for that matter did not pick officers in part due to political considerations? What would have happened if Obama had not thououghly investigated officer candidates political leanings and inadvertently picked Birthers as high ranking Military Officers?
Don’t you think that if he would have allowed Birthers to be among the high ranking officers that he would possibly be at risk of one or more of those officers causing disent in the ranks and perhaps even a military revolt against him?
Because if Trump were to officially and publically challege any cadidate’s eligibility it would immediatly cause the whole Birther thing about Obama to become front and center in the major media 24/7 and Trump would then be forced to either admit that he is still a Birther and face the ridicule or publically denounce Birthers and lose the Birther vote.
Congress has definitely done it’s job as far as investigating Obama is concerned and then some.
It kind of sounds like when people were saying that Zullo and Joe were merely waiting for the right time to release their gut wrenching Universe Shattering information.
The funny part is that when people lie about having Universe Shattering information which they just cannot release at this time blah, blah, people believe that lie for years but when someone like Trump is being sincere in saying that he wants nothing to do with the Birther issue, no one wants to believe him.
The truth is, it is always darkest just before it turns pitch black.
Strunk points out that the US District Court orders him to –
“....[S]chedule for the resolution of the merits of this case, within 21 days after the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari of the pending appeal”. (Strunk will most likely delete this post however if he does you will see where he deleted it).
The act of the US Supreme Court dismissing his case and denying him a hearing means that the US Supreme Court is satisfied that theTrial Court acted properly in dismissing his case in the first place and since the US District Court already anticipates dismissil by the US Supreme Court there is no doubt that the US District Court will agree with the Trial Court and the US Supreme Court and will also dismiss Strunk’s case.