<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/953184</link>
		<description>Comments by Ottawa_Centrist</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ch-ch-changes</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150352016</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s either that or we all comment that we agree with you 110 %.  O&amp;#039;Doyle Rules! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150352016</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150341027</link>
<description>And the mythology of right-leaning governments cutting spending and taxes continues. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 16:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north/#IDComment150341027</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Alternate realities</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/#IDComment149515433</link>
<description>So? We elect representatives. In a system that discounts more votes than it counts, representation is skewed. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/#IDComment149515433</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Alternate realities</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/#IDComment149512725</link>
<description>It would be a more accurate reflection of the vote, yes? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 16:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/06/alternate-realities/#IDComment149512725</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Tom Mulcair clarifies </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/tom-mulcair-clarifies#IDComment149474760</link>
<description>The media are overwhelming centrist and employ people all over the spectrum. My comment was directed to the perpetual media victim crowd. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 13:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/tom-mulcair-clarifies#IDComment149474760</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Michael Ignatieff lands a job at University of Toronto</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/michael-ignatieff-lands-a-job-at-university-of-toronto#IDComment149474073</link>
<description>Good luck Ignatieff.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/michael-ignatieff-lands-a-job-at-university-of-toronto#IDComment149474073</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Michael Ignatieff lands a job at University of Toronto</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/michael-ignatieff-lands-a-job-at-university-of-toronto#IDComment149470434</link>
<description>Does sound like he came back to stay, however. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 13:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/michael-ignatieff-lands-a-job-at-university-of-toronto#IDComment149470434</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The fringe standings</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/the-fringe-standings#IDComment149238078</link>
<description>While they may never win, I appreciate their efforts all the same. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 20:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/the-fringe-standings#IDComment149238078</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Tom Mulcair clarifies </title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/tom-mulcair-clarifies#IDComment149226339</link>
<description>This is just a fabricated non-story by the biased right-wing media! #EveryoneCanPlayVictimNow </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/tom-mulcair-clarifies#IDComment149226339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;I actually don’t know quite what to tell these folks&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment149167237</link>
<description>If being out-maneuvered means not lying, Pearson would be best to stay out of politics while he still has his dignity. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 14:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment149167237</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Meet the new kids</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/meet-the-new-kids/#IDComment148856949</link>
<description>Send in Trump to investigate </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 May 2011 16:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/meet-the-new-kids/#IDComment148856949</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Commons: The day after</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/the-commons-the-day-after#IDComment148840837</link>
<description>I think it is fantastic that some young, inexperienced people were voted into the House. The status quo is toxic and focussed on concentrating power in the PMO and surrounding unelected officials. Representation for the people who will be paying off the national deficit/debt for the next half century is very welcome. They will make mistakes, there will be gaffes... from all the parties.  The more young people in politics the better. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 May 2011 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/the-commons-the-day-after#IDComment148840837</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Monday vote sees modest bump in turnout</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/monday-vote-sees-modest-bump-in-turnout#IDComment148564000</link>
<description>I think an imperfect system produces imperfect results and too many people are complacent. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 20:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/monday-vote-sees-modest-bump-in-turnout#IDComment148564000</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What went wrong with the projections?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/what-went-wrong-with-the-projections/#IDComment148563393</link>
<description>ThreeHundredEight.com - Powered by Oracle. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 20:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/what-went-wrong-with-the-projections/#IDComment148563393</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What just happened? (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/what-just-happened-ii/#IDComment148517676</link>
<description>There will never be one single reason. Millions of people produce unpredictable outcomes. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 18:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/what-just-happened-ii/#IDComment148517676</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What motivated you to vote the way you did in the federal election?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/what-motivated-you-to-vote-the-way-you-did-in-the-federal-election/#IDComment148508325</link>
<description>The silent majority has a minority of seats. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/what-motivated-you-to-vote-the-way-you-did-in-the-federal-election/#IDComment148508325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What motivated you to vote the way you did in the federal election?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/what-motivated-you-to-vote-the-way-you-did-in-the-federal-election/#IDComment148504955</link>
<description>I voted hope. Fear carried the day.  Now that accountability and responsibility are squarely at Mr. Harper&amp;#039;s feet, I hope he evolves into a statesman for all Canadians and the NDP keep him honest.  The time for excuses and obfuscation are at an end. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 17:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/what-motivated-you-to-vote-the-way-you-did-in-the-federal-election/#IDComment148504955</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Loonie falls on election polling, lower commodity prices</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/loonie-falls-on-election-polling-lower-commodity-prices/#IDComment148199975</link>
<description>Analysts would be much happier if the NDP found the same magic money tree to shake as the Conservatives. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2011 19:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/loonie-falls-on-election-polling-lower-commodity-prices/#IDComment148199975</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : And now, the exciting conclusion</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148188091</link>
<description>If the government falls in a month, the GG may call on another party to see if they can gain the confidence of the House.    I wonder if Harper would accept this... &amp;lt;drowned out by boos&amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2011 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148188091</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : And now, the exciting conclusion</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148186405</link>
<description>I have no idea what the seat count will be, but the NDP surge has culled much of my pessimism about the state of federal politics and what Canadians are willing to tolerate from their &amp;#039;leaders&amp;#039;.    My only prediction is that the NDP will beat the Libs, but only by about 20 seats. Both parties combined will control a minority slightly larger than the CPCs. Would love to see a NDP minority, but their support is too national to pick up regionally the same way the CPC, Libs and Bloc will.    Cons - 135, NDP - 78, Libs - 58, Bloc - 35, Green - 1, Ind - 1 </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2011 18:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148186405</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>