<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2631205</link>
		<description>Comments by OriginalEmily1</description>
<item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150384475</link>
<description>There is also a collective &amp;#039;we&amp;#039;.  We as a nation, we as Canadians.  We have made a great fuss about Ignatieff&amp;#039;s Canadianness, we made a great fuss about rescuing &amp;#039;Lebanese&amp;#039;, we don&amp;#039;t make any effort to help people unless they&amp;#039;re &amp;#039;real&amp;#039; Canadians....we flew empty planes rather than pick-up other people trying to evacuate Libya....in fact &amp;#039;real&amp;#039; Canadians have become a popular topic lately.  Who is, and who isn&amp;#039;t a &amp;#039;Canadian&amp;#039;.  We did it with everyone from Khadr to  Dion and even to the GG.  We don&amp;#039;t worry about our international obligations on anything but war anymore....not on climate or pollution or finance....etc We pretended being dumped from the UN didn&amp;#039;t matter.  Here&amp;#039;s an item for you as well.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/apr/13/canada-michael-ignatieff-election&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifameric...&lt;/a&gt;   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150384475</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150381119</link>
<description>Yes, the big outside world.  We have turned in on ourselves, and fear the big outside world. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 19:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150381119</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150379228</link>
<description>Yes, we very much have.  Other countries have noticed it, even if you haven&amp;#039;t.  Yes, agoraphobic....afraid of the big outside world. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150379228</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Looking north (II)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150377651</link>
<description>Yes, we&amp;#039;ve recently become very parochial, xenophobic, agoraphobic....it&amp;#039;s a long way from the global citizens we used to be. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/looking-north-ii/#IDComment150377651</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150369486</link>
<description>&amp;quot;In the place of an honourable man who was falsely accused of &amp;ldquo;only visiting&amp;rdquo; we now have an MP that was elected without ever setting foot in the riding. &amp;quot;   You really had to work to change the meaning of that...and you failed. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150369486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The time is now</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150360479</link>
<description>Jeepers...sic em! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 17:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/the-time-is-now/#IDComment150360479</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Ch-ch-changes</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150360213</link>
<description>Okay, done. Off and running. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 17:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/ch-ch-changes/#IDComment150360213</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150351380</link>
<description>???? didn&amp;#039;t make one. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 17:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150351380</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150336091</link>
<description>Ahhh more of that &amp;#039;rank partisanship&amp;#039; I see. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150336091</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What&#039;s Wrong With This Picture (Literally)?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150335795</link>
<description>No </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150335795</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150334005</link>
<description>The straw man is the one you &amp;#039;brung to the dance&amp;#039;....don&amp;#039;t blame me for setting a match to it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150334005</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What&#039;s Wrong With This Picture (Literally)?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150333573</link>
<description>Seeing ANY woman is  &amp;#039;sexually suggestive&amp;#039; to fundies....their age and appearance have nothing to do with it.  Same as with rape. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150333573</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150332148</link>
<description>Nobody&amp;#039;s sending any &amp;#039;messages&amp;#039;.   That would require Canadians to be one cohesive group, and we&amp;#039;re not.  It&amp;#039;s millions of Canadians making individual votes, not some joint effort. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150332148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150331771</link>
<description>Actually, that&amp;#039;s pretty much all you&amp;#039;ve posted since your arrival.  If all you ever want to hear are good things about Harper, I suggest you join the Blogging Tories   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150331771</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150331327</link>
<description>The adjective here is &amp;#039;rank&amp;#039;.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150331327</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : What&#039;s Wrong With This Picture (Literally)?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150329904</link>
<description>All religions are anti-women.....the fundie orthodox ones are extreme in this regard. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture-literally/#IDComment150329904</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150329299</link>
<description>Many sage observers?  No, sorry...that isn&amp;#039;t even remotely true.  And in any case, one lone blog....however you perceive it.... didn&amp;#039;t swing this election. Get real. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150329299</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150327885</link>
<description>Why would a Liberal MP suddenly become &amp;#039;non-partisan&amp;#039;?  And why is it only unclassy when Libs and Dippers are partisan but not when Cons are? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150327885</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150327591</link>
<description>Or you could stop blaming one blog for everything that&amp;#039;s wrong in your world. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150327591</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;We are all judged by it&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150324776</link>
<description>This man missed his calling. He should follow Elizabeth May&amp;#039;s lead and become a member of the clergy. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 15:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/09/we-are-all-judged-by-it/#IDComment150324776</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>