gdp's Comments

Big Journalism : Reward: $100,000 for Full 'JournoList' Archive; Source Fully Protected

Tue, 29 Jun 2010 19:21:50 +0000

Thank you Mr. Breitbart. You are much appreciated.

Big Government : Stupak Finally Sells Out: 8-9 Pro-Life Dems Will Vote for Bill to Fund Abortions

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:56:14 +0000

Here is video proof showing Stupak saying that he would vote for healthcare even if it paid for abortions. The man lied to us about being pro-life: http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2010/03/video_p...

Big Government : Unsolved Mysteries and Irreconcilable Differences for Mr. Scott Harshbarger

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:02:10 +0000

Thanks GSH. I appreciate your info. But it sure does make me sad. It doesn't sound like there is much than can be done outside of a miracle. I hope that miracle comes through Breitbart, O'Keefe, and Giles. I just saw Greta Van Susteren on Fox with a guest... it was not favorable because of the editing in the Philadelphia video and the police report. I do hope the truth prevails... sooner than later.

Big Government : Unsolved Mysteries and Irreconcilable Differences for Mr. Scott Harshbarger

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:05:14 +0000

Ok, this may be dumb, but I think the White House is trying to isolate Fox because of Acorn and trying to control the rest of the press from reporting on Acorn. They need Acorn for the upcoming elections.

Big Government : Unsolved Mysteries and Irreconcilable Differences for Mr. Scott Harshbarger

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:01:26 +0000

Excellent idea. I have thought from the time this document surfaced that there is something wrong with it. It does not make sense.

Big Government : Unsolved Mysteries and Irreconcilable Differences for Mr. Scott Harshbarger

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:58:13 +0000

What has bothered me from the beginning, is Ms. Lewis initial nervousness that quickly turned to bravado. It gave me the impression that she had been reassured by those in high places that they would be protected. All of the pieces of the puzzle seem to keep pointing to there being a great deal of power protecting them. The final straw for me was when I realized that Acorn has played an important, if not prime, role in getting Democrats elected. This left me with the ugly feeling that the Dems will not let them go under. They need them for the 2010 and 2012 elections. Please take care of yourselves and I pray for the truth to prevail in all. Thanks for your hard work and guts.

Big Hollywood : 'Not Evil Just Wrong' Premiere Big Hollywood Live Stream

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:33:14 +0000

I really have a problem with the title of this movie. I think it should be: Not Only Wrong, But Evil. These evil lies have caused people to die from malaria (DDT), die from starvation (bio-fuels), badly frightened children (and feel helpless and guilty), and threaten to end industries/jobs. These lies could make the Great Depression look like child's play. It's EViL. On another note, I have a friend who lives in Nashville. It seems the ordinary folk think he's a bag of hot air and scum. On earth day when everyone was to turn off their lights... guess whose house was lit up like a Christmas tree? Yep. Gore aka gore the taxpayers. UGH, I hate these lying scumbags who want to cripple our nation with their scheming lies.

Big Hollywood : Promising Pre-Med Wins Nobel Prize in Medicine

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:42:07 +0000

Bulls-eye!

Big Hollywood : McConaughey Gets It: Rom-Com Star Supports Veterans

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:40:09 +0000

Hey Christian, Doesn't that photo makes Matthew look like a deer staring into car headlights? I hope that is not prophetic of being hurt by his support of our troops! I really like this guy, and I liked 'We are Marshall' so much I bought the DVD. AND I rarely purchase movies. :)

Big Hollywood : McConaughey Gets It: Rom-Com Star Supports Veterans

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:31:57 +0000

I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt. Who knows why or if he was wrestling with the risks to his career? I'm just glad he has chosen to openly support our troops. :)

Big Hollywood : McConaughey Gets It: Rom-Com Star Supports Veterans

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:28:16 +0000

This is wonderful news! It is so encouraging to see actors step out to support our military. I had wondered if he was one of the good guys. Hey, he was born and bred Texas, and now has a ranch near his hometown. Gotta be a one of the good guys! :)

Big Hollywood : The G.I. Film Festival and Gary Sinise: Supporting Our Troops

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:44:53 +0000

Thank you for reporting on this. Please encourage these wonderful artists for us all. I do hope that the news of who are decent good people in the arts will come into the light more and more. I never meant to, but I have found myself unconsciously marking who is who in the arts. I find such a distaste for those on the left that I know I will avoid being part of their audience anymore - I could not stomach them. On the other hand, I find myself so thankful and proud of those on the right, that I know I will go out of my way to support them. Now... I'm off to check out the link you provided to Mr. Sinise etal. Thank you.

Big Hollywood : Shock: Obama Not Left Enough for SNL

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 02:31:20 +0000

Way to go Des! I'm glad your sense of humor is still working, I think I lost mine about 10 days ago.., Grrr.... :)

Big Hollywood : Shock: Obama Not Left Enough for SNL

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 21:33:00 +0000

Two promises come to mind immediately: 1. End government waste, corruption, and lobbyist influences. 2. Post-racial, bi-partisan, leader. Instead, the exact opposite has happened. He is a lying, wanna-be, Celebrity-in-Chief who is unfit to fulfill the office of President. Sheesh, he doesn't even understand Business 101. I'm not sure how to make it a comedy satire, I think it's a Horror Show.

Big Government : Olympics: Just a Reminder, Obama Wasn’t the Only One Who Lost Today

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:30:58 +0000

It is because I care about the good people of Chicago that I opposed the Olympics there. They do not need to be eaten alive or be crushed under back-breaking taxes. I hope this loss is the beginning of the end of the Chicago political machine and Chicagoans can regain their city.

Big Hollywood : Jack Webb Schools Roman Polanski on Sex with Children

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 17:40:15 +0000

I LOVE this video. Bravo to the person who put this together. And ditto on the pure-genius comments!

Big Hollywood : Polanski Vs. Kazan: A Tale of Two Oscars

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:10:50 +0000

I just read that Mike Nichols signed the petition to support Polanski. Isn't he the husband of Diane Saywer, who a couple of days a ago tried to describe Polanski's arrest as possibly causing a 'true international incident' -- ???

Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Obama's School Plan

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:47:33 +0000

"And if you disagree with me, you`re probably a racist." Priceless. :)

Big Hollywood : Whoopi Defends Polanski: 'It wasn't rape-rape.'

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:47:44 +0000

After this comment by Whoopi, do you suppose that the American public will finally wake-up and stop watching, The View?

Big Government : Is Obama the Next Woodrow Wilson?

Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:07:28 +0000

Mr. DeMartini, I read an article by Jake Tapper that ties nicely into discussion. You can see the entire article here: http://tinyurl.com/ycjj88t What I think is relevant is one of the links he posted in his update at the end of the article. It links to Nicholas Burns testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. I think it gives a great deal of insight into Obama's foreign policy choices. Here is the link: http://tinyurl.com/r34f5a Here are a few snips I found revealing: ------------ That leaves diplomacy as the most plausible way to blunt Iran’s nuclear ambitions. I have some familiarity with the difficulties and tradeoffs of a diplomatic approach. For three full years, between 2005 to early 2008, I served as the point person on Iran for Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. We worked hard to find a path to the negotiating table with Iran. In June 2006, we launched the most serious and ambitious American attempt since the Iranian revolution of 1978 to establish meaningful discussions with Iranian officials. Along with Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany, we offered Iran negotiations on nuclear and other issues. We were determined to begin talks with Iran and expected that negotiations would take place. Unfortunately, Iran rejected over the next two years repeated offers by the U.S. and its partners for talks. Iran walked away and missed a rare opportunity to pursue a better relationship with the United States. ----- How should the new American government led by President Barack Obama respond to this open challenge? While I am not in a position to know what our government will ultimately do, I am frankly encouraged by the initial statements of the President and his team to take the offensive against Iran through strong and active diplomacy. In this sense, I believe we are fortunate, indeed, that President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have asked Ambassador Dennis Ross to coordinate our policy toward Iran. He is one of the most skillful and experienced public servants in our country and one of our foremost experts on the problems of the Middle East. I think the Obama administration has made the right decisions on Iran in its first months in office. President Obama’s new and positive appeal to Moslems worldwide, his video message to the Iranian people, his invitation for Iran to attend the UN conference on Afghanistan and his pledge that the U.S. will now participate in the P-5 nuclear talks with Iran, have all put us back on the diplomatic offensive with the Iranian regime. The absence of a clear Iranian government response to these steps is telling—accustomed to keeping the U.S. off balance in recent years, the Iranian leadership appears to not know how to respond to these more positive American initiatives. That is not an insignificant accomplishment at this early stage of the new administration. ------- A diplomatic opening to Iran will require patience on the part of Americans. Progress is unlikely to be made in the early stages. As Karim Sadjadpour testified to this committee in March, there will certainly be those in Iran who seek through intemperate statements to derail the process. There will undoubtedly be criticism by some in the U.S. that diplomacy is naïve or even appeasement. We would do well to ignore these all too predictable attacks and to give President Obama the time and flexibility he will need to sustain a complicated and difficult diplomatic negotiation with Iran. ------ There appears to be a method their madness. Please read Jakes article and all of the links... perhaps we should address/focus on the policies offered in Mr. Burns' testimony in order to understand how to best address Obama's policies?