OrcaSoul

OrcaSoul

139p

19,983 comments posted · 20 followers · following 0

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 2 replies · +3 points

You didn't use ANY "reasons".

You say it's invalid because it's invalid.

That ranks right up there with "I am, therefore I am."...

I say it is NOT invalid. Prove me wrong. Don't go crying Boner tears to the Administrator, show me the proof that it is invalid.

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 1 reply · +1 points

"I'm saying something went wrong with their sexual orientation. "

And WHAT, exactly, is that "something"?

WHAT went "wrong"?

WHY is it "wrong", by who's standards is that judgement made? Yours?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 1 reply · +1 points

Actually, I'm having trouble with your posts because you are using your purported invalidation of homosexuality to validate you view that homosexuality is invalid.

That's one of the most blatant and useless forms of circular logic I've seen here in a long time.

I'll make it simple for you:

WHY is homosexuality "invalid"?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 1 reply · +4 points

A question:

Do you think that being gay is a choice, or a result of biology?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Electrical power surge... · 1 reply · +2 points

OK, this happened in a utility's vault, while a contractor was working in the vault.

Was this a State contractor, or one working under a private contract?

Hopefully the contractor & utility have insurance.

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 3 replies · +3 points

"I said pretending that a homosexual orientation is just as valid as a heterosexual orientation is a falsehood. "...

Based on what facts? What makes one valid while the other isn't? How can it be a falsehood if the individuals are quite sure that it is valid? Based on someone else's opinion? Especially when you want to codify it into law?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 1 reply · +2 points

"just as valid."...but how are they not "just as valid."? What reason is there - specifically - to say one is valid but the other isn't? Why shouldn't the government see them as equally valid?

You can't say, openly, can you?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 3 replies · +1 points

"Because that would be a falsehood. "...

In what way is it a falsehood? It's an individual judgement, not your call.

"I'm saying something went wrong with a deaf person's hearing. Do you disagree with that? "

If a person was born deaf, how do you demonstrate that their quality of life is lesser than yours? They "hear" in ways that you don't, they use all of their remaining senses to hear with - often to a greater extent than those who have "perfect" hearing.

I have a loss of the upper ranges in both ears. That is mainly from two factors:

1: it's hereditary.
2: it's common for our hearing to change as we get older.

Where is the "wrongness" in either of those causes? They are natural causes, so how can they be wrong?

Just as being gay is a natural condition.

So...how can you say that being gay - a natural condition - is wrong, if it occurs naturally?

And, if something is natural, why should that be the basis of denying the person their rights?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 3 replies · +1 points

"No, an infertile couple getting married doesn't lead the government to lie about the homosexual orientation being as valid as the heterosexual orientation. "

And yet the ONLY factual "problem" you have stated for opposing gay marriage has been:
"I.e., they can't procreate (a fundamental biological activity) with a person they're attracted to."

So which is it?

Why is an infertile straight couple "OK" for marriage, and yet a gay couple is not? WHAT is the basis for your exclusive rejection of gay marriage? Can you state that specifically - something with a bit more specificity that "it is wrong"?

Are you afraid to actually lay it out as to what specifically is "wrong" with gay marriage, because you KNOW that it will show you to be a bigot?

461 weeks ago @ KOMO - Seattle, WA - Calif. gay marriage ba... · 4 replies · +4 points

Or..."thinking too much about how "immoral" gay marriage is causes ED among evangelical Christians...".