<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/705328</link>
		<description>Comments by Obviousman</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Pet tarantula makes eye contact with owner</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.1a5a12d18f8f95ac94d23cc5b35c5f72.fc1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment49980604</link>
<description>OUCH! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jan 2010 00:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.1a5a12d18f8f95ac94d23cc5b35c5f72.fc1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment49980604</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Avatar&#039; and Boycotts: When the Left Does and Doesn&#039;t Champion Free Speech</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49546461</link>
<description>Yeah, I&amp;#039;m starting to think little Jimmy Cameron isn&amp;#039;t that bright. He strikes me as a guy who has been lucky enough to be surrounded by much more talented guys who have pushed him forward. Kinda like Lucas.  I don&amp;#039;t think he was trying to attack the Marines on purpose.  Still, that&amp;#039;s the overall public image. I want that image to fail.  Those amazing cameras aren&amp;#039;t going anywhere. There will be more and better &amp;quot;True&amp;quot; 3D movies within a year and a half. I&amp;#039;ve already waited over 20, what&amp;#039;s another few.  The next director will do a better job anyway. I bet little Jimmy&amp;#039;s framing was static and unimaginative. Maybe not.  I don&amp;#039;t think I care anymore.  Did anyone see the new Batman - Superman cartoon? Public Enemies?  Let&amp;#039;s vote -  better as  Cartoon Live Action  I say  Live Action </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49546461</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Avatar&#039; and Boycotts: When the Left Does and Doesn&#039;t Champion Free Speech</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49394214</link>
<description>Thank you for your thoughtful responses. They really do make me think.  I&amp;#039;ve read in several places that they&amp;#039;re Marines and they enjoy using their superior firepower to kill the weaker smurfs. I was under the impression that there are several scenes showing Marines as blood thirsty and evil.  Is this not true? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49394214</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Avatar&#039; and Boycotts: When the Left Does and Doesn&#039;t Champion Free Speech</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49343159</link>
<description>Not in this particular case.  No more anti-Marine films. No more. Especially at this scale. The only way to make that happen is to stop watching them.  If you watch them, they&amp;#039;ll just make more. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49343159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Avatar&#039; and Boycotts: When the Left Does and Doesn&#039;t Champion Free Speech</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49258373</link>
<description>I have been studying and creating 3D art since the 80s. I am a super GEEK. I was using VR goggles from the beginning. Enough that I know tricks that can cancel out the headaches, BTW. That&amp;#039;s how hardcore with 3D immersive displays that I am.  I&amp;#039;ve been waiting for this technology to come to fruition since 1989 when the first article about this particular tech became available. To see a movie with this tech made using these cameras is a big deal that I&amp;#039;ve been waiting for, PATIENTLY, for 20 freakin&amp;#039; years. To say I&amp;#039;ve dreamed about seeing 3D done right with the proper cameras and replay technology would be a complete understatement.  I will never see this movie.  Marines, thank you so much for your service and putting your lives on the line for the Constitution.  Merry Christmas! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/fdemartini/2009/12/27/avatar-and-boycotts-when-the-left-does-and-doesnt-champion-free-speech/#IDComment49258373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is This the Future of America (Detroit)?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48604298</link>
<description>I was simply asking a few questions.  At this point in history and over the last 100 years, has there been any evidence that blacks don&amp;#039;t require a large amount of outside assistance to be successful as a group?  What responsibility does the average white have in regards to the average black?   So if they, as a group, do require outside help to be successful, is that white people&amp;#039;s responsibility?  If they don&amp;#039;t require outside help, I&amp;#039;m just asking for some evidence.  I&amp;#039;m not saying I&amp;#039;m not racist. I never wanted to be, but I believe my views have become that.  That&amp;#039;s why I ask these questions, in the hopes that someone could give me an explanation, without calling me names just for asking.   I&amp;#039;m definitely no commie. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48604298</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is This the Future of America (Detroit)?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48546159</link>
<description>Wow, everyone&amp;#039;s comments have been very thoughtful without name calling and personal attacks. Better yet, I even learned a few things.  I think there are some well educated people on this thread. I do not mean to come across as snarky, but this may come across that way, hopefully not.  I don&amp;#039;t think my question was answered, but maybe I should be more clear.  At this point in history and over the last 100 years, has there been any evidence that blacks don&amp;#039;t require a large amount of outside assistance to be successful as a group?  What responsibility does the average white have in regards to the average black?  Finally, Should the Europeans have left the blacks alone to develop at their own pace? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48546159</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is This the Future of America (Detroit)?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48525177</link>
<description>Umm, what does Ancient Egypt have to do with blacks?  They were Egyptians. Same people still live there to this day. They&amp;#039;re not what comes to mind when you think of Detroit. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48525177</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is This the Future of America (Detroit)?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48516215</link>
<description>They&amp;#039;re just going to call you names. Most people still aren&amp;#039;t ready to discuss this.    Everyone, call me names instead of Matt. Please just answer this one question -    Where in the world (or history) have blacks created a sustainable and admirable society?   Are you a bunch of liberals that need to call someone names when you can&amp;#039;t argue the matter?   Let the flames commence - </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/scrowder/2009/12/21/is-this-the-future-of-america-detroit/#IDComment48516215</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : House votes to extend tax on wealthy estates</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CC1OQG3#IDComment45752123</link>
<description>I lost track of this thread, but someone said earlier  &amp;quot;what you earn is yours, not everyone else&amp;#039;s.&amp;quot;   Then someone said back  &amp;quot;Not because just anyone declares it so.&amp;quot;  So I guess they disagree with the statement that the money we produce is ours.  I just have to say to that person -  You don&amp;#039;t think that statement is true? You don&amp;#039;t think what you earn is yours? You don&amp;#039;t think having someone take away 75 dollars out of every 100 dollars, leaving you with only 25 dollars left, is wrong?  If so, could you please give me 75 bucks for every 100 you make to me? I&amp;#039;ll spend it better than you. On things more important than you would.  Face it, you&amp;#039;re too greedy to know how to spend it. Where I&amp;#039;m not.   I&amp;#039;m plain better than you.  I&amp;#039;m a member of the government.  Give me what you earned or I&amp;#039;ll throw you in jail.  Does that seem fair to you?  6,000 years of recorded history and nothing has changed. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CC1OQG3#IDComment45752123</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Parcbench : The Swiss Ban on Minarets Is No Cause For Conservative Celebration</title>
<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45471986</link>
<description>We get attacked by terrorists because they are evil. They find joy before their god through the murder of their fellow man. They believe they must make all other cultures submit before theirs.  The biggest reason they attack us is because they are not afraid of us. They know no matter what they do, there will always be a bunch of Westerners sobbing that they&amp;#039;re just misunderstood and that we provoke them.  Basically what you&amp;#039;re doing.  Fuzzlenutter isn&amp;#039;t the problem, joanrich is.  BTW, that&amp;#039;s all the troll feeding I&amp;#039;ll be doing. I feel dirty already. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45471986</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Parcbench : The Swiss Ban on Minarets Is No Cause For Conservative Celebration</title>
<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45471177</link>
<description>Very well put Mr. Hill. Forgive me for cutting and pasting this sentence thrice, but there is NO more important thought in regards to this whole discussion.    Islam is not a &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot;, but rather a political ideology, and one at direct conflict with Western civilization.    Islam is not a &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot;, but rather a political ideology, and one at direct conflict with Western civilization.    Islam is not a &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot;, but rather a political ideology, and one at direct conflict with Western civilization. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45471177</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Parcbench : The Swiss Ban on Minarets Is No Cause For Conservative Celebration</title>
<link>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45470859</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s about time the Swiss swung back. The islamists have been hitting the Swiss with their own fist for decades now. I was getting worried they didn&amp;#039;t know how to fight back. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.parcbench.com/2009/12/01/the-swiss-ban-on-minarets-is-no-cause-for-conservative-celebration/#IDComment45470859</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Rocket fired from Gaza into Israel: army</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.817b096e8b0f2936fc2c9458d4d3486b.211&amp;show_article=1#IDComment44316068</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Hamas is the government at the moment but punishing women and children isn&amp;#039;t legal&amp;quot;  Umm, don&amp;#039;t terrorist attack punish &amp;quot;women and children&amp;quot; (what about men, btw?).  Seems like you think it&amp;#039;s OK when Muslims do something but hate to see Jewish people defend themselves.  Seek treatment for your anti-semetism please. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.817b096e8b0f2936fc2c9458d4d3486b.211&amp;show_article=1#IDComment44316068</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42504911</link>
<description>I find it hard to watch the Daily Show anymore. Stewart has drank the koolaid and is no longer sticking it to the President. I think he only did it to the last guy because he was a Republican, not because he was opposed to invading Iraq.  People are turning to Fox because they&amp;#039;re the only ones OPENLY questioning the White House&amp;#039;s policies. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42504911</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42503944</link>
<description>The entire world use to believe the world was flat.  The entire world still believes that socialism is on the left. Hitler was a socialist. The leftist media just has people a bit confused because they&amp;#039;ve used the term &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot; to refer to Hitler for the last few decades.  This silliness is passing as I type this. People are waking up to the fact that 90% of all media has had a left wing bias for the last 40 years.  Socialism = left Nazi = Socialist Nazi = left  Hope that complex formula helps your mind move to the obvious truth. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 00:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42503944</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42396511</link>
<description>Also, don&amp;#039;t try to pretend you understand the history of the time period when you&amp;#039;ve already proven you don&amp;#039;t.  REALLY, read up on it. It&amp;#039;s all over the internet.  A common sign of someone who THINKS they know something about the 1930 - 40s, but hasn&amp;#039;t read any actual HISTORY books is they say Hitler won the popular vote.  That&amp;#039;s what most people think. Because, like you, most people don&amp;#039;t read history books. They get their understanding from popular culture, just like you.  Hitler was a leftist. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42396511</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42396052</link>
<description>She didn&amp;#039;t say that you did.  Starting to get the whiff of an anti-semite around here. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42396052</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42394184</link>
<description>HISTORY says he was a socialist.   He did EXACTLY what he said he was going to do.  He was a collectivist and acted as so.  Read his stupid book. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 01:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42394184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Berlin bans neo-Nazi group</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42393937</link>
<description>So you get all mad that someone points out that the Nazis were pro baby murder. Say you&amp;#039;re going to ignore them because it&amp;#039;s a slam on &amp;quot;pro-choice&amp;quot; and I&amp;#039;m not to infer that you support baby murder?  Yeah right. I think you gave your views just fine. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.0b0383c4fbcb6258714a5675c307dca2.351&amp;show_article=1#IDComment42393937</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>