<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/721052</link>
		<description>Comments by Obamadinejad</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UN climate chief: Hacked e-mails are damaging</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CDSUF00#IDComment46113868</link>
<description>But seriously, global warming supporters continue to try to minimize East Anglia&amp;#039;s role in global warming science. They keep trying to paint East Anglia as some remote outpost that has little impact on the overall science.         The reality is East Anglia is the nerve center of global warming research and has their hand (numbers) in most of the AGW articles, videos, films, essays, reports and research produced over the past decade at least.       All of that work done by thousands of well-meaning people is now flawed or useless because of East Anglia.... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CDSUF00#IDComment46113868</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UN climate chief: Hacked e-mails are damaging</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CDSUF00#IDComment46110738</link>
<description>This scandal might produce some serious emotional problems for global warming supporters. We might have to setup special global warming detox programs to help those having trouble adjusting to real-world science.                 Stuttering and mouth-breathing might be some early signs of a pending detox. Muttering the words Santa, the Easter Bunny and global warming in the same sentence may indicate a full-blown detox in progress. If you see this, call 911.... </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CDSUF00#IDComment46110738</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : ClimateGate Roundup: All the News Not Fit to Print</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/04/climategate-roundup-all-the-news-not-fit-to-print/#IDComment45917648</link>
<description>This is a great example of the MSM&amp;#039;s bias we can use to educate skeptical friends and family. Email your favorite skeptics a few links to WSJ and NYT articles to prove the story exists. Then ask them to give you a heads-up when NBC, CBS, ABC or PBS airs the story. The longer they wait for their &amp;quot;trusted source&amp;quot; to report the story, the less confident they&amp;#039;ll become in that source...  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/04/climategate-roundup-all-the-news-not-fit-to-print/#IDComment45917648</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : ClimateGate Roundup: All the News Not Fit to Print</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/04/climategate-roundup-all-the-news-not-fit-to-print/#IDComment45915888</link>
<description>This scandal might produce some serious emotional problems for global warming supporters. We might have to setup special global warming detox centers to help those having trouble adjusting to the real world.   Stuttering and open-mouth breathing might be some early signs of a pending detox. Muttering the words Santa, the Easter Bunny and global warming in the same sentence may indicate a full detox in progress. For now, if you see this, call 911. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/12/04/climategate-roundup-all-the-news-not-fit-to-print/#IDComment45915888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UK University to probe integrity of climate data</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45785103</link>
<description>&amp;quot;One chain of e-mails does not undo scientific consensus which is broadly based and relatively universal,&amp;quot; Miliband said.   Uh... it does if that &amp;quot;broadly based and relatively universal&amp;quot; consensus is based on false data... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBVM701#IDComment45785103</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45783009</link>
<description>That &amp;quot;very small percentage&amp;quot; of scientists you mention provided the data for &amp;quot;hundreds and hundreds of peer-reviewed essays.&amp;quot; That&amp;#039;s the part of this scandal you are not getting Auslinda. Those essay results are now based on flawed numbers. They all have to be redone.  East Anglia and their CRU department are like the nerve center for global warming research. That&amp;#039;s why this is a big deal... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45783009</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45781970</link>
<description>Auslinda, I think the point you&amp;#039;re are missing is that the people and organizations you mention got their data from East Anglia&amp;#039;s Climate Research Unit (CRU).   That&amp;#039;s what makes this so bad. Every study the the UN has conducted these past ten years has to be redone... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45781970</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45631997</link>
<description>And the Wizard of Oz tells Dorothy to &amp;quot;Ignore that man behind the curtain.&amp;quot; But Dorothy can&amp;#039;t because she can &amp;quot;see&amp;quot; the man behind the curtain is real and average and not the grand image on the screen.   Liberal socialist can say what they want to keep their lemmings in tow, but the rest of us can see the man behind the curtain... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CBFB901#IDComment45631997</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama faces delicate balancing act on climate</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dbd0d58212f48118340a6335d97e2c47.c1&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment45130289</link>
<description>They know about climategate. They&amp;#039;re trying to pretend it away for now knowing they really only have a few more months before it&amp;#039;s common knowledge...  Obamacare, Copenhagen and cap and trade are all DOA... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dbd0d58212f48118340a6335d97e2c47.c1&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment45130289</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Leaders say momentum building on climate change</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C8SC7G0#IDComment45120481</link>
<description>This reminds me of when the Wizard of Oz told Dorothy to &amp;quot;ignore that man behind the curtain.&amp;quot; We can all see the man yet he babbles on. Global warming is DOA. Over. Done. We know it&amp;#039;s a hoax now... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C8SC7G0#IDComment45120481</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>