'Things seen as racist.' Proved my point. What racist jokes did he make?
He also smeared Assange, implying that he was a rapist despite the fact that the Swedish Government dropped the charges. Disgraceful article.
'In Gothenburg, on Saturday, the mob gathered outside a synagogue and pelted it with molotov cocktails. Children were ushered into the basement for their own protection. Police were on the back foot: their intelligence should have detected the plans. As swift as the police were slow, the far right chose to blame it on Sweden’s social model. The conflict between its social model and Muslim immigration has become a theme of theirs.'
These are weasel words. Three people were arrested last night for the firebombing of the synagogue, two Syrians and one Palestinian. We don't need the 'far-right' to explain to us how the deft virtues of the Swedish 'social model' are failing and letting certain people in their country who hate Jews and want to burn down synagogues.
Although it is amusing to see 'conservative' writers such as this gentlemen still performing all sorts of mental and verbal gymnastics to try to hide the central problem as we all understand it, it's starting to wear a little thin.
I hope to see less of this nonsense on this website.
Fair enough, I was under the impression that Bill Clinton tended to maintain that he was personally pro-life so as not to lose the south.
80% of Cubans in Florida vote Republican, 90% blacks vote Democrat and 70% of Muslims vote Labour. What you're describing is political identification based on race. An observable phenomenon everywhere and always.
What hasn't been corroborated is the information provided by the sources, which seems in fact to be false. Anyway, it's all going to come out shortly. There may well be a second Special Prosecutor.
But this has all been corroborated by other journalists. The DNC has even admitted this.
What evidence do you have of that? Because he's from the south and is a republican? Oh and the media told you.
The reason Bush lost the 92 election is because he failed to cut spending, went back on his promises not to raise taxes ('read my lips') which led to Ross Perot and 20% of his party deserting him.
Incorrect. Steele was ex-MI6 but the major sources for the dossier were senior Russian officials:
'Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was ‘a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.' Source B was ‘a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.’'
In other words, the DNC paid someone to work with senior Russian officials against Trump. Does this sound like collusion to you?