<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/505872</link>
		<description>Comments by Nilbog</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196285647</link>
<description>Most of the AK-style guns for sale in the U.S. have american made recievers with FORMER Soviet block parts assembled in the U.S. - that way they aren&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;imported&amp;quot; by BATF definition. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196285647</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196284425</link>
<description>cycling the bolt on an AK is a pretty unnerving sound as well. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196284425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196283379</link>
<description>I guess I chose &amp;quot;brandish&amp;quot; as it is a legal definition. I rejected &amp;quot;display&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;show&amp;quot; as they seemed to imply holding up a weapon and saying &amp;quot;look what I have.&amp;quot; But I meant brandish in the way you describe, aiming it with a verbal warning. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196283379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196282149</link>
<description>I have frangible rounds as I live in a brick row house with kids as neighbors and would rather be killed by a bad guy than accidently kill a kid. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196282149</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196280013</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t accept either of those expressions as a philosophy. By accepting a waiting period, you are saying that when it comes to the exercise of your fundamental rights, you believe you cannot be trusted to do so without the approval of the government. If you believe it for one right, the same arguments work for the limit of any of the others. Those rights are not granted by the government, rather the government is blocked by the Bill of Rights from restricting them.    And to use your example of a riot, wouldn&amp;#039;t it be more effective for the government to restrict objectionable speech so as to prevent riots rather than allow them to happen under free speech and then block people&amp;#039;s means to protect themselves after it happens? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196280013</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196242860</link>
<description>Would you have a problem with a 7 day waiting period before responding to this or any other article or any other opinion you wish to express- after passing mandatory training of course? A fundamental right is just that - fundamental. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196242860</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196239578</link>
<description>As the VAST majority of uses of firearms to stop crimes end with a weapon being brandished, not fired, to a dumb criminal (a redundant term) a semi-automatic AK-47 is scarier than a shotgun. As most criminal are at least as misinformed as the author of this article, they would think they are facing a potential spray of automatic fire. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196239578</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196237516</link>
<description>If you are familiar with pistols, you would only fire one single-handed if you have been injured. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196237516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196237046</link>
<description>Real (full auto) AK-47s are difficult to fire accurately in automatic bursts due to its well-deserved reputation for muzzle lift. It&amp;#039;s accuracy as a semi-automatic rifle suffers more from its use by third world untrained fighters in fire-from-the-hip &amp;#039;spray and pray&amp;#039; fashion than any actual lack of performance. It is no hunting or sniper rifle, but to use the word &amp;#039;lousy&amp;#039; to describe its accuracy is inaccurate. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196237046</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Florida firm welcomes clients with AK-47</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196234161</link>
<description>I am almost certain that the voucher is NOT for an AK-47 ASSAULT RIFLE. Such a weapon is capable of fully automatic (machine gun fire), would have to be a used 20 year-old weapon and would require ENORMOUS paperwork and licensing to aquire. In addition, it would likely cost tens of thousands of dollars as its import and manufacture have been banned since the 1st Clinton term. Almost certainly, the voucher is for a semi-automatic rifle that is an &amp;quot;AK-47&amp;quot; in appearance, NOT in operation costing less than $1,000.. Calling a semi-automatic rifle an ASSAULT RIFLE is not only a gross error, it also creates the false impression that what most people would call &amp;quot;machine guns&amp;quot; are both common and easily available - neither of which could be further from the truth. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.5cc676d2b02da276cd06b20df22fe7f6.961&amp;show_article=1#IDComment196234161</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166292021</link>
<description>The F-111 was the result of a mandate that all fighter planes be bombers. The result: a plane that when flown by the best pilots on the planet, even the untrained Libyans could shoot down in the 1980&amp;#039;s with unmaintained 1960&amp;#039;s Soviet hardware. Mandates! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166292021</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166290449</link>
<description>One word: &amp;quot;waivers.&amp;quot; Free to anyone who has demonstrated their party loyalty. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166290449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166289547</link>
<description>Russia and China could never afford or outlast the EPA permitting process to purchase the U.S.A. The EPA will bury them (and everyone). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166289547</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166286360</link>
<description>It would mandate ICE engines. By ICE you mean Immigration and Customs &amp;quot;Enforcement,&amp;quot; right? All work currently done by evil machines, would now be done by illegal immigrant slave labor. The Democratic party built its historic foundation on the slave trade, so why not return to its roots? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166286360</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166285194</link>
<description>No administration from any party will ever be able to kill the EPA. It is Leviathan. It is Legion. All other man-made laws, organizations and things (including the Congress, President and Constitution) exist at its pleasure. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166285194</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Liberal Republicans Push 100% Hike in Fuel Efficiency Standards</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166284342</link>
<description>I call on Fearless Leader to mandate all forms of transportation to get 1,000,000,000 mpg effective immediately. Put Big Oil out of business! Create millions of jobs for teamsters!. Not the Teamsters RICO Union, but teamsters - a.k.a. mule team drivers. And I&amp;#039;m the one that&amp;#039;s supposedly anti-environment and anti-progress? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 21:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2011/06/24/liberal-republicans-push-100-hike-in-fuel-efficiency-standards/#IDComment166284342</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : New Tone? Attacking Sarah Palin&#039;s Son</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/scrowder/2011/04/21/new-tone-attacking-sarah-palins-son/#IDComment145017654</link>
<description>This crosses*A* line? Hell, you listed six lines it crossed right off the top of your head. I could probably list 20-30 more. Life is made tough calls and things that could fall on either side of the line between right and wrong. Wonkette is CLEARLY not any of those things. If only making the right judgement was always this easy ... it shouldn&amp;#039;t be. But in this case it obviously is. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 05:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/scrowder/2011/04/21/new-tone-attacking-sarah-palins-son/#IDComment145017654</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : What To Do With Bradley Manning?  Execute Him,  Says Incoming Intel Chairman</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2010/12/16/what-to-do-with-bradley-manning-execute-him-says-incoming-intel-chairman/#IDComment116189927</link>
<description>In a way, Assange has done the cause of justice a favor. Nearly all traitors who are traders in secrets avoid the death penalty by pleading guilty and helping us assess the harm to our security they have caused. The specifics of what secrets were compromised by the Pfc are available on Wikileaks leaving no incentive for the Army to make a deal that would spare his life.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2010/12/16/what-to-do-with-bradley-manning-execute-him-says-incoming-intel-chairman/#IDComment116189927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : CA man allegedly paid teens to spit in his face</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C3FC5G0#IDComment44255828</link>
<description>Charles Hersel, AKA Greg Gutfeld. On Friday&amp;#039;s Red-eye, he finished his phonecall to his mother who lives in CA by saying he would see her soon. He keeps Schulz around for this purpose in NY.  BUSTED </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C3FC5G0#IDComment44255828</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Counterpoint: Borat of the Right Releases Fantasy of ACORN Prostitution Ring</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/lessig/2009/09/13/counterpoint-borat-of-the-right-releases-fantasy-of-acorn-prostitution-ring/#IDComment34385049</link>
<description>Are you an actual person? This post reads as though it were created by some liberal talking points program. Are there people who actually run thoughts through their heads like this and come to such ridiculous accusations, slanders and paranoid conclusions? You do realize real people don&amp;#039;t sound like this when they talk or write I hope.  All the best Chris </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/lessig/2009/09/13/counterpoint-borat-of-the-right-releases-fantasy-of-acorn-prostitution-ring/#IDComment34385049</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>