Neuro8048
14p10 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - A Government of nation... · 0 replies · +1 points
Well done all.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Why the Left prefers c... · 0 replies · +1 points
The “debate” will still be the Brexiteers whinging that reality hasn’t matched their ideology.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - The Moggcast. "Can we ... · 0 replies · +1 points
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - The Moggcast. "Can we ... · 1 reply · +1 points
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - The Moggcast. "Can we ... · 1 reply · +1 points
If we make less money that means we are poorer. I hope you’re still following, I know this is hard. If we’re poorer people are sad. If people are sad they don’t vote for the morons that inflicted the sadness on them.
Oops, sorry about “inflicted”, “made them sad”.
Now multiply by every sector of the economy.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Johnson has the inesti... · 1 reply · +1 points
Then the EU didn’t roll over and give you what you wanted, as you’d assured everyone they would. Whose fault was that? The evil EU of course, for sticking up for their members. Which ironically was something you lot said they didn’t do.
Then it became clear that Brexit was foundering on the exact points identified by experts prior to the referendum, specifically Ireland. Whose fault now? The people who claimed it would be easy and dismissed expert advice as “Project Fear”? No, now it was somehow a loyal and dedicated civil service and fifth column remainers all evilly thwarting the brilliant plans you still somehow couldn’t elucidate even given two years.
Now you’ve decided that a referendum in which all parties explicitly ruled out No Deal is a crashing mandate for destroying the economy, splitting the Union, and trashing Britain’s reputation. Anyone gainsaying you is shouted down as one of these evil anti democratic fifth columnists.
I’ll grant you, given three years you have finally figured out a plan. It’s bloody stupid, consists largely of giving up, and anyone opposing it should be applauded, but at least it’s a plan.
But please, please, please stop whinging about how it’s everyone else’s fault. You come across as stupid petulant children.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Johnson's August 2) Fi... · 0 replies · +1 points
By every analysis, including the ERGs, there will be economic disruption on a large scale after a no deal Brexit. A huge amount of people who supported it will feel they were lied to. They will either believe it was not “done properly” and is down to incompetence or that it was done illegitimately (e.g. proroguing).
In either case enquiries WILL be set up and they WILL find significant wrongdoing and unethical behaviour across the board. This will lead inevitably into even more distrust from the public and likely even more division. This will be the Tories Chilcot report, and will almost certainly result in the Tories out of power for decades or longer.
But sure, you don’t think there will be negative effects.
There are no good ways out of this mess now. Not one. EVERY single road leads to greater division, partisanship, and toxic atmosphere; and a great many to economic ruin or damage.
Remainers value economics over sovereignty and leavers the reverse. There seems to be no appetite for compromise and so whichever side “wins”, this will poison the political atmosphere for decades to come.
It will be the ultimate Phyrric victory.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: “The US is co... · 1 reply · +1 points
You’re quite right that trade deficits have knock on effects, but only a few are negative. The main knock on effect they have is increased overall wealth. The others are lately along the line of side effects.
Not sure how you could be passionate about Global Britain if you don’t believe in free trade? Surely the main advantage of leaving the EU was to strike trade deals elsewhere?
Do you think they’re all going to be trade surpluses? Or even that they’ll reverse the balance of payments? It’s unlikely they will, however that’s not a bad thing.
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: “The US is co... · 1 reply · +1 points
The fundamental problem with the NHS is simple economics: there always has to be rationing for scarce resources. It’s either money or access that is used for rationing. The NHS uses rationing (queues, delays, authorisations). This is not wrong per se, but it’s the natural outcome of choosing not to use money.
Before deciding to change systems, how about deciding what outcome you want? Do you want poor people turned away from healthcare? If so, to what level? Lifestyle, elective, preventative, essential, or critical?
4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: “The US is co... · 4 replies · +1 points
There’s a great book on this by a good British chap called Adam Smith.
If I buy something from you for £5 it’s because it’s worth at least £5 of value to me. I haven’t LOST anything unless I’m incorrect on my valuation of the goods. Generally I’ve GAINED because it’s worth more to me than the £5. In most cases much more.
Trade deficits also don’t take into account FDI, which in the UK’s case are massive.