<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/474950</link>
		<description>Comments by BOOTumALL</description>
<item>
<title>Impeach Obama Campaign : Obama administration moves to distance itself from BP on oil spill response</title>
<link>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/obama-administration-moves-to-distance-itself-from-bp-on-oil-spill-response/#IDComment78105949</link>
<description>I heard obama today stating how if any laws were violated those persons perpetrating that violation would be prosecuted. Why not the same position on immigration? I saw a subtitle on MSNBC where they actually printed, &amp;quot;Arizona Law makes it illegal to be an illegal immigrant&amp;quot; ?? Whaaaa? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/obama-administration-moves-to-distance-itself-from-bp-on-oil-spill-response/#IDComment78105949</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Western Center For Journalism : Impeach the stonewalling Obama</title>
<link>http%3a%2f%2fwww.westernjournalism.com%2f%3fp%3d8163#IDComment78101407</link>
<description>Sestak, Stupak what&amp;#039;s the difference? They&amp;#039;re both shills for obamarchy. I was listening to a tyraid by Hillary Clinton when G.W. was president. She is now silent. All the Dems are the lowest sort of vile DNA. Most Republicans are too. Whenever I listen to someone like Jendall,  Pawlenty, Boehner, McConnell, even Lamar Alexander and Paul Ryan I wonder are these guys genuine. Especially Ryan and Alexander I have some faith in these two but who knows? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jun 2010 23:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http%3a%2f%2fwww.westernjournalism.com%2f%3fp%3d8163#IDComment78101407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Letter to the Congressional Black Caucus from Tea Party Federation: Please Provide Evidence of Canno</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/natteafed/2010/04/26/letter-to-the-congressional-black-caucus-from-tea-party-federation-please-provide-evidence-of-cannon-n-word-incident/#IDComment72224137</link>
<description>I happened to be right there when the congressional delegation walked from the office building to the Capitol on the March 20, 2010. I can assure you I heard no racial slurs. As we hear more about how racist the TPP is we hear very little about the vandelism and riotous behavior of the left on May Day. I&amp;#039;m supposed to let you folks know I am here from the Song of Truth Patriot group. Feel free to visit Indyforjobs and the rest of us doing what we can for Liberty. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2010 01:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/natteafed/2010/04/26/letter-to-the-congressional-black-caucus-from-tea-party-federation-please-provide-evidence-of-cannon-n-word-incident/#IDComment72224137</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Illinois Shows Limitations of Tea Party Movement</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/02/03/illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/#IDComment55317811</link>
<description>I say we move to vote out all incumbant congressman. Install a 100% freshman congress. This would certainly signal a powerful movement to the governing body. If it didn&amp;#039;t shock them into rethinking their Big Government stance and convince them to disassemble the monstrosity we have now, well in two years they&amp;#039;re gone. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/02/03/illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/#IDComment55317811</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Illinois Shows Limitations of Tea Party Movement</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/02/03/illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/#IDComment55317430</link>
<description>I agree with you R.Green. My philosphy is vote out the incumbant regardless of party. Install a complete freshman congress in 2010. What else would tell the politicians there is a disconnect? From there you determine who gets the message of limited government. It would in essence be a Tea Party Congress. It would also hobble the money interests by determining the candidate without all the campaigning. The problem herein lies in races where there is no incumbant running. In this case a conservative vote would be in order, </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2010/02/03/illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/#IDComment55317430</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>