<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/170783</link>
		<description>Comments by Nathaniel</description>
<item>
<title>Prayers to the Atheist God : On up-to-the-minute news</title>
<link>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-up-to-minute-news.html#IDComment34241117</link>
<description>That was kind of the point of my post. Was I too subtle? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/on-up-to-minute-news.html#IDComment34241117</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Prayers to the Atheist God : Companies whose motto is apparently &quot;do be evil&quot;</title>
<link>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/companies-whose-motto-is-apparently-do.html#IDComment32536039</link>
<description>Frankly, I&amp;#039;d be perfectly happy to give Disney copyright on Mickey Mouse forever, if they would agree to quit screwing up copyright laws for everyone. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/companies-whose-motto-is-apparently-do.html#IDComment32536039</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Prayers to the Atheist God : Companies whose motto is apparently &quot;do be evil&quot;</title>
<link>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/companies-whose-motto-is-apparently-do.html#IDComment32535929</link>
<description>If it&amp;#039;s not mentioned in any of the four links I put in, I don&amp;#039;t know. I can tell you what&amp;#039;ll happen to Fox&amp;#039;s reputation, though: nothing. This happened several years ago. Did you hear anything about it? No. Neither did anyone else. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/08/companies-whose-motto-is-apparently-do.html#IDComment32535929</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Prayers to the Atheist God : A geometry problem</title>
<link>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/07/geometry-problem.html#IDComment30446990</link>
<description>You confused me too, but you do seem to have found a counterexample. Two &amp;#039;L&amp;#039;s and a &amp;#039;T&amp;#039; is not the best one, though: it is possible in some configurations, but not others. Two plus shapes and an &amp;#039;O&amp;#039; is a better example; I don&amp;#039;t think there&amp;#039;s any way to do it at all. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 23:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://prayerstotheatheistgod.blogspot.com/2009/07/geometry-problem.html#IDComment30446990</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Enough is enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/enough-is-enough.html#IDComment28396249</link>
<description>You know, I always figured I was safe as long as I wasn&amp;#039;t an asshole or an idiot. Oh, well. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/enough-is-enough.html#IDComment28396249</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Enough is enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/enough-is-enough.html#IDComment28038828</link>
<description>At least the Macs have a command line now. Any so-called OS that doesn&amp;#039;t give the user a command line might as well be saying, &amp;quot;You are too stupid to use a real computer.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/enough-is-enough.html#IDComment28038828</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Theocracy: Not AWWRIGHT</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/theocracy-not-awwright.html#IDComment27213482</link>
<description>Frankly, I&amp;#039;d be surprised if theocratic laws were based on anything else.  ...I&amp;#039;m sorry. I couldn&amp;#039;t help myself. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/07/theocracy-not-awwright.html#IDComment27213482</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26588076</link>
<description>There&amp;#039;s a difference between accepting some people&amp;#039;s testimonials, and accepting a unanimous consensus. Can you find &lt;i&gt;anybody&lt;/i&gt; who will say, &amp;quot;I got a cloud chamber, but didn&amp;#039;t see any protons or neutrons&amp;quot;? People who otherwise seem sane, I mean; no counting the time-cube guy.  If you ask experts on science, I imagine &amp;gt;99% will tell you quantum physics is real. If you ask experts on religion, I would be surprised if &amp;gt;50% will tell you Christ rose from the dead. (If you restrict yourself to people in the US, the numbers might be more comparable.) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Jul 2009 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26588076</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26527360</link>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/tol\/comment\/columnists\/guest_contributors\/article4761159.ece&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;I found it!&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26527360</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26479687</link>
<description>Um, yes? Computer CPUs use quantum physics to function. I&amp;#039;ve seen electrons (this is what CRTs do), and I could buy a cloud chamber for less than $100, and see protons and neutrons. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Jul 2009 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26479687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26090853</link>
<description>&amp;quot;We also pray for him to move, to heal, to preserve, etc.&amp;quot; - But do you do this with the expectation that your prayers will have &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; effect on his actions? Because that would seem to be contradictory to the idea of an omniscient god, in addition to being scientifically falsifiable. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jul 2009 04:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment26090853</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment25995844</link>
<description>So prayer is not about affecting what happens, it&amp;#039;s about helping yourself to accept what happens? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jul 2009 05:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment25995844</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : When god simply isn&#039;t enough</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment25693701</link>
<description>I remember reading an article somewhere (a british newspaper, I think) using this sort of thing to argue that many supposedly religious people are actually atheists, on the grounds that if they &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; believed in god their actions would reflect it. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/when-god-simply-isnt-enough.html#IDComment25693701</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : iPhone users</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/iphone-users.html#IDComment24972261</link>
<description>Are you saying none of the people who jailbreak their iphones are douchebags? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/iphone-users.html#IDComment24972261</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Ray Comfort joins the Taliban</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/ray-comfort-joins-taliban.html#IDComment24685081</link>
<description>Let me introduce you to &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.logicalfallacies.info\/presumption\/tu-quoque\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tu Quoque&lt;/a&gt;; I believe you&amp;#039;ve met. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/ray-comfort-joins-taliban.html#IDComment24685081</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Ray Comfort joins the Taliban</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/ray-comfort-joins-taliban.html#IDComment24661342</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t in good conscience get too worked up about a vandalized billboard, as if it was done for humor value I&amp;#039;d be applauding it. The blog post, however, is worrying, as it shows that Ray considers rape and murder to be just a step away from getting aroused. Note to self: never let Ray see a Playboy. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/ray-comfort-joins-taliban.html#IDComment24661342</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Uncommonly Dense gets it right</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/uncommonly-dense-gets-it-right.html#IDComment24660880</link>
<description>While science is antagonistic towards faith (faith not liking the whole &amp;quot;question everything, try to find out, never be sure&amp;quot; thing), I don&amp;#039;t think evolution is really more of a problem than any other branch. It just happens to be the bit the fundamentalists in this country decided to focus on. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/uncommonly-dense-gets-it-right.html#IDComment24660880</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Browser wars explained</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/browser-wars-explained.html#IDComment24008165</link>
<description>Must...have...more...features... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/browser-wars-explained.html#IDComment24008165</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Quoted without comment</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/quoted-without-comment.html#IDComment23773706</link>
<description>Wow. In the bible, not in the bible, you just can&amp;#039;t win with these people. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/quoted-without-comment.html#IDComment23773706</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Evolved and Rational : Here we go again...</title>
<link>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/here-we-go-again.html#IDComment23555493</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d plug &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/NearlyFreeSpeech.net&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;NearlyFreeSpeech.net&lt;/a&gt;, but they&amp;#039;re US-based. They talk a good game about free speech on their site, but I&amp;#039;m not sure how OK they&amp;#039;d be with getting nasty lawyer-letters. On the other hand, they&amp;#039;re small enough to have an Office Space quote on their site; you could just ask them. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Jun 2009 08:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.evolvedrational.com/2009/06/here-we-go-again.html#IDComment23555493</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>