en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/328435 Comments by MrKelly http://www.katu.com/news/business/Rocks-shatter-windows-at-banks-coffee-shops-140864923.html#IDComment305624279 I agree, lets start with anything they have or use that a capitalist created. Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:19:49 +0000 http://www.katu.com/news/business/Rocks-shatter-windows-at-banks-coffee-shops-140864923.html#IDComment305624279 http://www.katu.com/news/business/Rocks-shatter-windows-at-banks-coffee-shops-140864923.html#IDComment305623096 Anti Capitalist vandals explained their actions using computers created by capitalists, software created by capitalists, from their homes that were built and paid for by capitalists. Wearing their clothese that weren't exactly hand made or free. If you don't like capitalism, don't purchase things from or work for any capitalist. If such things don't exist, then create it for yourself and others. Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:18:05 +0000 http://www.katu.com/news/business/Rocks-shatter-windows-at-banks-coffee-shops-140864923.html#IDComment305623096 http://tv.breitbart.com/kucinich-slams-president-obamas-war-actions-with-senator-obamas-anti-war-rhetoric/#IDComment136772811 What's the exit strategy? Why are we there? Define what success looks like? What does it mean to "Win" this conflict? All questions the media asked day in and day of Bush. I expect the same level of coverage for this president. Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:23:36 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/kucinich-slams-president-obamas-war-actions-with-senator-obamas-anti-war-rhetoric/#IDComment136772811 http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115125653 If you want to shrink the gap between the rich and the poor, more power to you. That's exactly what I want as a conservative. But if your entire strategy revolves around taking the rich down to shrink that gap, vs. lifting the poor up. Shame on you. You are evil, no matter how big of 'P' you put in front of your "Progressive" badge you are so proud of. I think we should call the progressives out on what they are. Selfish, greedy, spitfull. In their unsatiable persuit to shrink that gap, if the result doesn't lift the poor up. You need to be called out on it. This man has made it clear that he wants to drag down the rich so incredibly bad, that he doesn't care if he takes the poor down a couple notches to do it. Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:02:15 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115125653 http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115125243 This is one of my Minnesota congressmen. We all know how much hate he has, he like our new governor, ran on a platform of greed and selfishness. He is proving it again here. They ran on, 'we are going to take from them, don't worry, not you, them...' Now, here he is, if you pay attention. Talking mostly about the gap between the rich and the poor, and how it needs to stop growing. But if you notice, just like every other socialist (And he is one). It's not about lifting the poor up, it's about pulling the rich down. Unemployment bennefits (Something I believe we should have) does not lift the poor up in any way shape or form, it just keeps them static or slightly below were they were. Punishes them for trying to get ahead, by design. It gives people something to not work. Tax cuts on the business owners, investors, savers, spenders, etc. Directly results in less economic opportunity for those who are unemployed. Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:58:59 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/dem-rep-calls-for-christmas-crisis-to-force-gop-on-tax-debate/#IDComment115125243 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112908457 3 of 3 Cause in effect is vital to understanding basic economics on any scale. And it is absolutly clear that government in any party is not capable of understanding the effects of their actions. This article points to one of them. I used my credit to float my day to day business expenses via my purchases out of my wallet. Or online inventory purchases until the billing statement. I simply can't do that anymore. Sure I could alter my business model, but the added expense and risk of the alternative makes it just not worth it. So I am closing my doors. for no other reason than the presidents anti credit card bill. That is the effect, two more closed buisnesses, struggle for me and those who relied on my business for their income and services provided. That was the effect of one politicians initial dream to make credit "Fair" for all. Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:16:21 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112908457 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112907896 2 of 3 When people in Washington pass a bill against the "Evil" credit card companies, the "Evil" health care co. Oil, etc. Those laws alter basic economics. They go against the laws of checks and balances on capitalism. They make it harder to do business, or otherwise alter the business plan of the entire industry. This by people who do not understand cause in effect. People that don't think through their laws any further than the first step, their good intentions. Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:12:38 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112907896 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112907505 1 of 3 I don't know if that's the reason? I used to have 10+ credit cards with $133K available credit through two of my businesses and my personal. Almost over night after president Obama signed his anti credit card bill, that available credit went down to about $30K. Some cards simply closed the account, others drastically cut the available credit. Not a one of them was left untouched. What is more likely? Every credit card company decided to change their policy's in the exact same way? Or Trickle-Down economics is in play here? The more logical explanation is that an outside force that effected all credit companies the same, happend all at once. Hmmm. I wonder what that could be? Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:10:12 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9JQ36200&show_article=1#IDComment112907505 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107585402 C'mon, do we need talk like that? Your statement is completely untrue. No good ol' boy would have done boo. This guy has done nothing that warrents the use of a gun in any way shape or form. Don't give us law abiding gun carrying good ol' boys a bad name with your careless commentary. Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:35:10 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107585402 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107584629 Thank you for your service. Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:30:31 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107584629 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107575041 I saw a different video of this Black Panther guy there. He looked scared. Reporters were asking him questions and he had the "Did I get in over my head?" look on his face. Like he had remorse for being there. Like someone put him up to it, and he was right there seeing that he was the person in the wrong. But he couldn't leave because those that put him up to it would maybe get violent with him. Saw a little human in him. Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:19:13 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/theyre-back-man-in-new-black-panther-uniform-returns-to-philadelphia-polling-place/#IDComment107575041 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9HNEND00&show_article=1#IDComment94585400 This is a teachable moment if I ever heard one. Progressives like Obama have big hearts, I'll give them that. So big that it squishes their brains into not working properly. Conservatives like myself are apposed to just about every Do-Good program any progressive comes up with. Not because we want to keep the poor down, quite the opposite actually. Not because we want people not to get the health care they need. Not because we want to starve the poor. No. It's because the actual results of their programs do exactly that. They just don't realize it because their minds are squished by their hearts. All things considered, this program did a lot more harm to society than good. That's a fact. Yes, there were some that it helped. But you must define "Help". People they consider to be "Helped" would have been far better helped had they got out of the house they couldn't afford. Now their still destined to be strapped for extra cash for the next 30+ years. That's exactly how you keep the poor down. By a program designed to "Help" Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:09:47 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9HNEND00&show_article=1#IDComment94585400 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.c6b7a7c8f2c3660aa232f7c0fc600cd8.c71&show_article=1#IDComment94144306 I drive a 2000 Silverado. When I bought it, I switched from all the F150's I had owned in the past. I'm back to Ford for my trucks simply because of government. If government had left them alone, they may have gone through bankruptcy. But the key is they would have rebuilt into a stronger, better company because of it. I was hopping for that. I would have definetly went out of my way to buy Chevy my next truck. I would have been proud too. But thanks to government and government alone, I will never buy another Chevy again. And I will make fun of those who do. Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:17:01 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.c6b7a7c8f2c3660aa232f7c0fc600cd8.c71&show_article=1#IDComment94144306 http://tv.breitbart.com/congressman-at-town-hall-the-federal-government-can-do-most-anything-in-this-country/#IDComment90328288 I love it: "You sir, and people like you are destroying this country." And if you notice, he nods yes....... Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:36:14 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/congressman-at-town-hall-the-federal-government-can-do-most-anything-in-this-country/#IDComment90328288 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ed601db5c044ea6ed60966ba1371bc8.4b1&show_article=1#IDComment69023295 Wow, sensitive are we? We will never progress as a society as long as there are people out there that just don't get it. Don't understand the difference between good humor banter celebrating differences and racism. Call me white cracker trash all you want, we don't take offense in the least. It's not about offense at all, it's about treating people equally and having fun with it. Don't you get that? It would be racism for us not to talk like this about minorities because we talk like this to each other. We would specifically have to treat them differently that we treat people like us. That's racism. Just like those who take offense are the real racists to us. Ever see Grand Torino? If you don't get it, it's not our fault. Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:37:22 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ed601db5c044ea6ed60966ba1371bc8.4b1&show_article=1#IDComment69023295 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ed601db5c044ea6ed60966ba1371bc8.4b1&show_article=1#IDComment69021705 I heard it was caused by Global Warming. Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:24:10 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9ed601db5c044ea6ed60966ba1371bc8.4b1&show_article=1#IDComment69021705 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F3KKUO0&show_article=1#IDComment68239671 I have nothing against people who make millions on a book. But does anyone else not notice that the profit margin to him from his book was nearly 100%. And he almost certainly created no jobs doing it. As well only a handful of people along the line bennefited financially from his book. What did he really risk? Yet he demonizes other people who actually invest millions of their own hard money taking on untold amounts of risk. He demonizes people that actually produce something of tangible value, hire people to help them produce it (Most of whome pay taxes as well, adding untold amounts to the gov't revenue, ie; if a business man makes 5.5M and paid 1.8M in taxes, it's almost certain the other actors involved because of that business man alone paid an additional 1.8m as well, but most likely more). He demonizes those who actually build economic activity from the ground up. Only to get 7-8% profit on their investment and only if they succeed (In a market where 95% of all businesses fail). Starting businesses that allow other to become rich or at least far better off as a result. Wow, just wow. Is his economic logic and ideas twisted. Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:54:32 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F3KKUO0&show_article=1#IDComment68239671 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67803234 I will be bringing my camera to all events rolling all the time. When I see someone saying racist things, I will automatically know it is a crasher. I will video them for as long as I can. Follow them to their cars, get their license plate and pictures of all of their friends. I sugest everyone does the same. We need to then collect this data and do what we can to expose this fraud. We must not let these crashers slander us with lies. Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:40:23 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67803234 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67802748 My lord, how can these crashers possibly think they are in the right? How can they live with themselves? They think most of us are what they are trying to be? Why is this not slander? They are admitting it right here that they are trying to lie to the American people. We are not who they think we are, so they have to come in and pretend they are use and doe what they think we are so they can say "See!!! They are who we thought they were." Wow, and this is tolerated. Should be a crime, a very hanus crime. Up there with insider trading and corporate corruption. Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:37:42 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9F1PU2O0&show_article=1#IDComment67802748 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EQEAHG0&show_article=1#IDComment65561944 Score another one for big government liberal ideas!!! They got just what they wanted. I mean, how could any person in their right mind think that there could have been any other possible outcome? They had to have known this was inevitable under their current state leanings. Fri, 2 Apr 2010 14:59:52 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EQEAHG0&show_article=1#IDComment65561944