gdp's Comments

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Secret Turkish Nerve Center Provides Aid to Syria "Rebels"

Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:34:03 +0000

The beauty of the Arab Springs is that colonialism will be reasserted and returned but cloaked as a beautiful native woman, cloaked as if the achievement of the people themselves, she pretends to be the heroine of French Revolution symbolism but underneath her skirts are the foreign enemies of the people of old, the Turk, the Saudi King, the Zionist and the European... But if they can give the Arabs a feeling that they have won something for themselves (after centuries of humiliations) then these CIA projects will be welcomed inside their houses like vampire guests. The Virus needs to adopt a protein coat - to fool the immune system and appear as though it is part of the body. The people will be convinced to believe in this bullshit and any true revolutionary urges will be defanged for generations. Ihave to give the CIA 100% top marks, though it wouldn't surprise me if this was a British idea, it is so very devious.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Secret Turkish Nerve Center Provides Aid to Syria "Rebels"

Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:39:42 +0000

Turks are Zionists, have been since the Ottoman Empire fell. The new movement in the Middle East is a chimera of Zionism and Salafism - the two blended together. It may only be temporary (and it's only purpose is to oppose Iran) or it may be around for a longer time. I have no doubts about the treachery that lies in the Arab heart now (and i believe such treachery comes from decades of abuse, an abused child might draw a knife to defend it's abuser - in a bout of Stockholm Syndrome). For centuries colonial empires were able to skillfully utilise the damaged soul of the colonised, directing him against his brothers - teaching him how to hate his own people and culture, his own history. It was the Baath parties which gave the Arabs their self respect back after centuries of Turkmen, European and Zionist colonialism (in succession - but all related). It was Gaddafi who tried to give Africa it's dignity back - now Africa is prostrate... ready to be deflowered again.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Information Clearing House: ICH

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:27:42 +0000

Good one False Afro Gimme hope Joanna was a song composed to protest apartheid. Here is the song.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNNfAuMq-M0 And new lyrics... Well Obama he runs a country... He runs in Tel Aviv and Wash ing ton.... He make a few of his people happy He dun care about the rest of town. He got a system they call intervention To keep the Arab in subjection But maybe pressure could make Obama see How bombs and terror ara just not on. ....oh Gimme hope Obama. I hear he take all the Jewish Money To buy new weapon in the shape of guns While every mother in a black township fears The lynching of another son. Sneakin across all the nation's borders With drone jokes having lots of fun He doesn't think that the terrorism he bring Is dangerous to everyone Gimme hope Obama, Hope Obama... He got supporters in high up places Who turn their heads to the City Sun Obama gets from them the fancy money Pursue the interests of Zion. He even knows how to swing Opinion In the magazine and the journals For every evil thing that this Obama do Liberals got a good ex pla na tion Gimme Hope Obama Gimme Hope... Before the Morning come. Even those Syrians who follow Jesus Whose bishop is a peaceful man Together say that the heroic army will Overcome the terror wrong I want to know if your blind Obama Can't you see what you do is just wrong? Is it worth all this unnecessary bloodshed? To just win election... Oh Gimme Hope Obama Sung in the name of the blacks terrorised in Libya by Obama.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Amnesty International\'s latest arms trade campaign is colonialism with a kindly face: &n

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:23:01 +0000

This is a strategy which is identical to the Arab Springs in form. The key is selective application. SOME Governments were targeted by the CIA terrorists for 'revolution' and also SOME Governments and terrorists around the world will be targetted by the US with this Treaty.... The ultimate purpose will be to advance US foreign policies and project US-Zionist power globally. It's the same as the ICC - they say it is a 'global' court but all it does is bully small countries who run afoul of the US - it's existence is an insult to the concept of global justice (still only theoretical). It is a neocolonial institution... The US is at the moment seeking (in the absence of a genuine global superpower competitor) to have it's policies enacted globally using various guises. There is good need for arms control but the US will just do it in a way that disadvantages it's enemies while leaving it's friends untouched. Something is better than nothing is not how these things work. What if there was a law that was only applied to you and not your neighbour? What if we have laws for every country on Earth but Israel (Ie Talmudic)? Exceptionalism in Law is not acceptable, that lady is blind - or it is not her.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Syria Tightens the Noose Around Its Own Neck Information

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 06:11:08 +0000

Replace the Korean leader with Assad in this cartoon and you get a wonderfully sarcastic take on the prevailing narrative in the Western media... http://missiledefense.files.wordpress.com/2011/07... And this is the mindset Assad is expected by Margolis to appeal to and win over (by not mentioning his WMD). People who would call Gaddafi/Assad/Kim a 'madman' and treat with Obama like he is a completeley innocent, decent global statesman.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Syria Tightens the Noose Around Its Own Neck Information

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 05:41:07 +0000

Then go read the NYT and feel clever. You can even convince yourself that Syria's promise to use chemical weapons in self defence is a form of 'attack' on Israel - i am sure there are columnists there who are even now thinking up ways to put that in the next column.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Syria Tightens the Noose Around Its Own Neck Information

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 05:35:08 +0000

Margolis does make one good point and that is he when he draws attention to the horrible scale of destruction which conventional (eg thermobaric) weapons are capable of. The use of WMD is minor compared to the horrors of conventional war and certainly the kind of sectarian war Israel wishes to see. Some people engage in a kind of magical thinking when contemplating what the US has declared as 'weapons of mass destruction'... they have been conditioned to do so. Conventional weapons which any aggression against Syria will utilise - are much worse because they don't have this scary unacceptable reputation of WMD... So their use is considered acceptable and widespread. As for the Resolution suggested by the Saudis - the Russians will block it or they wont - if they don't it won't be because of the Syrian suggestion to use all weapons it has at it's disposal if it is attacked... Rather it will be because Russia has decided to stop obstructing NATO's goals for Syria. Syria is a peaceful country and despite the provocations thus far will only use these weapons in self defence, Iraq was even more peaceful - it gave up it's WMD - and was pulverised and contaminated with DU as a reward. N Korea gives up nothing and threatens to use it's WMD in self defence - nobody attacks N Korea... Being a stupid dove is dangerous to the health.... time to get realpolitical (and get real). All nations on Usraeli kill list should be accumulating WMD as quickly as they can, i support that completely in the name of peace.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Syria Tightens the Noose Around Its Own Neck Information

Sat, 28 Jul 2012 01:17:50 +0000

Regime change in Libya was NATO policy, they would have gotten there anyway they could, however they learned from Iraq that you need to have a plan before you go in. Their plan in Libya was to fake the idea of a 'revolution' (the media do the job of disseminating NATO's narratives and pretending things that are happening are spontaneous or not part of a long term plan), attack the country and install the puppets - and that's just what they did... The 'turmoil' created the puppets, all the auxiliary terrorists that are stalking Libya and moaning are feeling disillusioned. If Gadaffi had promised NATO the moon and stars the endpoint of regime change wouldn't have been altered in anyway. Likewise in Syria they have the endpoint of regime change - now we must ask ourselves how can Syria oppose that plan effectively? By what... being nice? Appealing to International Law and demanding a fair hearing? That was tried by Saddam (where is he now?), by offering the West concessions (Gadaffi did this, where is he now?). The only way to stop it from happening is with force and power - to hurt NATO and friends if they mess with your sovereignty.. and to carry it through if necessary. Assad should have biological weapons too (why didn't he get them dammit) and he should be declaring (it's not a 'threat' - a 'threat' is proactive - not defensive)... that secret allies Turkey and Israel will get splattered with WMD too should they intefere. It's like an electrical fence, if i touch it i suffer an electrocution, it is appalling - but whose fault is it - mine or the owner of the fence?

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : US Endorses Syrian Terrorism: Russian Foreign Minister

Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:28:30 +0000

The US spent the first half of the 00's invading countries because it said they had Al Qaeda (and Syria, Libya cooperated with the US in this) and the second half using Al Qaeda to invade countries. They double-cross so often it is amazing they have any allies outside of the EU and British Commonwealth to help them... And as much as i oppose the Usraeli empire i think if they invaded Qatar or Saudi i might start cheering for them We appreciate the Russians' attempts to defend the integrity of the United Nations at least (in preventing it from becoming another US foreign policy tool, another adjunct to US imperial power) - even though this is only part-time (Russia and China failed Libya) and even though the organisation itself seems riddled with imperialists and interventionists... so much so that i wonder is it worth saving?

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Syria Tightens the Noose Around Its Own Neck Information

Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:23:04 +0000

West doesn't need 'excuses to invade' that's a false perception the Western warlords have invented themselves... It makes them appear reasonable (as though their policies are formulated according to arguments and facts and reason). If the Iraq war has thought us anything it is that all this is planned beforehand and then a narrative is composed (sometimes in a hurried and half assed way) to justify what they were going to do anyway. The West will only desist if there is too much to risk, to threaten to use chem weapons in event of foreign attack is a compelling reason for foreigners not to interfere. Margolis is another pseud, he is pretending to be neutral or against war but he makes an argument that points the finger at the Syrian Govt - when the Syrian Govt position is eminently reasonable... 'Intervention' or brutal invasion is the outrage not the Syrians' promise to defend themselves using everything they have if attacked.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Chris Hedges : The Careerists

Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:20:56 +0000

No the Nazis as the losers of the Great War, have been cynically marketed as demons. This served multiple purposes. 1. Promotes the Judaocentric agenda. 2. Promotes the military cause of US/UK/NATO - used well beyond the scope of WW2 - US/UK as the counterpoint 'angels' to the Nazi 'demons' - as the poster c.t says, they still characterise their enemies as Hitler today. All sides were ruthless during WW2, all sides comitted genocide, torture - crimes against civlians etc. The fact that you think it is just 'obvious' that the Nazis are uniquely 'evil' and feel it doesn't even need analysis is because it is a concept that has been sandblasted onto you. The Nazis were guilty of a great crime.... losing. That is the only thing that separates the countless allied war criminals (like Bomber Harris) who walked free - and the former Nazis hounded into their 90s.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Video - Anaheim Mayhem: Shock-cops kill two over 3 days of brutality

Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:04:48 +0000

I like the way Russia is covering the news America won't - RT is garnering quite a reputation for itself as an information clearing house in it's own right. Considering the way Western media reports on Russia, turnabout has been long overdue.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Post

Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:21:00 +0000

The reason why they have Int Laws? Consider the verb 'legitimise'.... To 'legitimise' means to make proper or legal what was previously considered suspect or underhanded. Int Law exists today to provide a legal framework for colonialism and imperialism. It is used to victimise small countries that do not act the way the West would have them act. Those who suffer selectively at the hands of such 'laws' must steadfastly remember that unjust laws deserve to be ignored and broken.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Romney promises blind allegiance to Israel

Thu, 26 Jul 2012 03:42:22 +0000

The Republicans and the Democrats aren't competing, they collaborate - the purpose of which is to change the political scene into one where the questions are 1. Who can do the most for Israel. 2. Who is most eager to start a war. While also moving the political centre of gravity to the right. Romney is happy to be an extreme right winger who doesn't get elected if his candidacy is used to justify Obama moving to the right and if his candidacy promotes every more bizarre acts of servitude to Israel and the Mil Ind Cmplx and Wall Street. It's clearly a clever double act... Which i have seen them use elsewhere eg with the BBC, ie accuse the BBC of anti-Israel bias. If this accusation is widely carried it can fuel a move by the BBC further into the Zionist camp (who then say 'oh we are accused from both sides' as though their Zionist position was 'middle of the road').. These tricks are used to distort debate and facilitate movement towards (right wing and zionist) extremism while portraying it as if it was 'moderate'. It is always a double act.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Post

Thu, 26 Jul 2012 02:00:21 +0000

It all comes down to a question of losses and gains, any country with resources and proximity to Israel which is independent needs to have some ability to make NATO aggression against it unpleasant for the aggressors... No diplomacy, no UN, no Int Law, no question of propaganda or the matter of 'convincing' Western populations matters - none of it will guarantee security or peace. Only the ability to hurt the aggressor and their interests is effective, a pure force deterrent. The problem is that many of the NATO nations would be expendable to Israel, how much control does Israel have - could she manoevre NATO into aggression even if it is mortally dangerous for NATO? Then countries have to have a backup plan to hurt the Zionist state too - in the event of NATO aggression. Israel is in a precarious state in that it's survival depends on immigration, so many dual citizens indeed - it needs to market itself as a desirable destination for Jews. One chemical weapon could change all that forever... How much are they willing to risk for Greater Israel? If i were Assad i would try to come off as a bit unstable (even having a mentality of a suicide bomber) in private communiques to Israel and it's allies. Trying to be reasonable and accomodating to them only gets you the fate of Saddam or Gaddaffi.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : \'Downing Street Memo\' Redux: Is the Intelligence Fix on Iran Already Underway?

Wed, 25 Jul 2012 02:29:25 +0000

Why is it that the functions of these spymasters seems to be to deceive their own public? This whole shadow government thing is a big problem for democracy, these devious liars should be sent to prison. In any event i think we are at the point now when such 'narratives' no longer matter, neither really does a successful propaganda campaign (and i do believe they could run one, because people are just so fucking stupid)... The Iranians will be preparing themselves for a realpolitik showdown with the West, that battle won't be won or lost in the pages of the media or in the speeches of these UK spies. The Iranians are really already under attack via sanctions, the EU/US have been extremely hostile and irrational and the warmongers' influence is so great that the avenue of diplomacy has become cluttered and nearly impassable. As someone who opposes the use of all weapons of mass destruction i think the Iranians should be developing nukes, it's a big country and a lot of people would die if it was attacked, the question becomes how can we deter that, how can we head that off with the West so unreasonable? The only answer left is WMD.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Russia’s Putin voices Syria Settlement Plan

Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:39:53 +0000

In Libya the reason why NATO had to get involved and flatten the Libyan military is BECAUSE they knew their terrorists wouldn't be enough and that is because of the support Gaddafi had among the people. They have to keep Libya as a human rights shithole today run by these criminal gangs in order to beat the people down... That was a part of NATO's plan - the militias roam the country attacking people, terrorising people... because the people reject them and their NATO puppet leaders. Libya was the biggest outrage of the Springs - rivalling that of Iraq - because NATO had to actually conquer the country directly. Any individual who supported what was done to Libya is a neocon imperialist sympathiser, all the dressing and pretense about human rights wasn't convincing enough for them to pleas stupidity or ignorance in their defence.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : UK Using Former SAS Soldiers To Train Syrian "Rebels"

Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:25:26 +0000

Wherever there is terrorism or a conspiracy of aggression against the nations of the Earth look closely, lift the rock and you will always find the British involved. Old habits die hard even though their old evil empire has undergone metamorphosis (now an international financial empire with Zionist creed).

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Chris Hedges : The Careerists

Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:05:06 +0000

Why do they always cite the Nazis when trying to lay out their theses about man's nature, or the nature of evil or whatever their topic of choice? Are there no other examples from throughout history? Aren't writers supposed to aspire to originality - in constantly citing one episode (WW2) it starts to become a cliche. Isn't it bad enough that we cannot have a movie or a discussion about WW2 withouit including some passage in which we offer our personal oath that the Nazis were indeed... 'evil'? That you cannot argue with them in Europe or you go to jail? That it's ok to forgive modern day war crimes (even give honour for them) but we must pursue 100 year old men around the globe for alleged things done 70 years ago? I am sure that many Nazis were indeed 'evil' - but authors please try to convince me of your arguments using other examples... for once. Surprise me even once by leaving out the Nazis entirely in your thesis of 'evil'. It's human nature that most people will go along with anything the herd agrees to, that people do not mind being part of a group which does bad deeds they would never as individuals contemplate or allow.

Information Clearing House - News you won't find on CNN : Washington\'s Plan B for Syria

Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:12:37 +0000

I would say that the Zionists and the Salafists are only 'using' each other (many of the latter are even only 'using' the banner of Islam) - though the real control will remain with the US and Israeli side. Some people say that the US failed in Iraq but of course that's not true - i would bet that if the Government there deviated significantly from the agenda written for them (eg by nationalising the oil) - that they would be removed and replaced... So yes i agree that they do not want them 'powerful and strong' in the sense of being independent... Even the Saudi King is just a US puppet which can be removed faster than we would believe... The US loves the system of monarchy however so most likely they would find one of his thousands of relatives to take the throne instead, each new appointee owes his position completely to the foreign sponsor and has little domestic base - this is something that distinguishes the likes of Gaddaffi or Assad from the likes of the Saudi or Qatari Kings.