en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/329473 Comments by Mongoose415 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30649527 Bet you the uncle was the rapist and he just did this to cover his ass. No wait, he did it because she got caught out, but he's still probably the rapist. Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:36:46 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027237.php#IDComment30649527 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26571886 Did you just call me Muslim? I don't think so bud. I don't trust them either. I've had numerous incidents with these people. Just because I'm calling bunk on something don't put me in with apologists. I'd be real interested in what the question was and the answer given, because the answer must be BS. Just this one instance in this video does not look right to me. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 21:29:56 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26571886 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564873 This is how it should have been done. Smaller and hidden cameras, questionable legality but who cares when you get a true response that is not censored. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:38:05 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564873 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564809 That youth was part of the group of filmers, because of Nabeels reaction, that youth was personally known to him before that incident. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:36:54 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564809 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564762 No, a normal persons reaction, that is not pulling what I accuse you of, would have responded by stating to the kid, "Hey what are you doing?" or at least looking at the kid as he walks away with an expression of shock. Nabeels reaction was not of shock, but of another step in an act. Granted everyone else he was interacting with there were not plants, just Nabeel and the kid along with the rest of the film crew. Nabeel did not react in any noticeable way to that kid. I'm sorry but that short scene was staged to get the reaction you wanted from the security group. Which I do agree was an inappropriate response, but you did stage it to get the reaction. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:36:02 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26564762 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26562192 The only part I'm calling bunk on is the hand off, minus a few other minor instances I question but don't really care about. That hand off seems very fishy to someone that IS trained to watch people and their reaction. You did not react like someone that had something taken right from your hand. YOU ACTED AS IF YOU EXPECTED THAT PARTICULAR PERSON TO TAKE THE PAPER, YOU EVEN MOVED IT TOWARDS THEM TO MAKE IT EASIER, YOU DID NOT ATTEMPT TO RECOVER IT like a normal person would that had something removed from them from a stranger. Based on your reaction, I can identify that that kid was known to you on a personal basis before the interaction. Just if you are going to do this kind of stuff, trying to show what Sharia is. You've got to do better. Unfortunately you video looks like a bunch of hysterical people trying to find a problem. Your approach was off. Also you can kiss my fourth point of contact, because I'VE been to IRAQ, and I'm damn proud of my service to this country for 12+ years. How long have you served in the military of this great nation? Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:57:58 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26562192 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26560167 I'm sorry but I have to call bunk on this one. This was a set up by the people filming, at 4:30 when the kid takes the pamphlet, the guy holding it transfers it from his left hand to right hand just before the grab. The kid comes up and the guy looks at him and moves the pamphlet towards the kid, after the grab there was no other reaction from the guy. A normal person when confronted with some unknown person grabbing something out of their hands would react and engage whoever took the material. This guy just kept on with his current conversation. Set up. I saw at least two other items that were staged by the filmers but I don't have time or interest in going into them now. Now I stand against Sharia and really don't trust Muslims in the first place. I have never had good interactions with them in neither Kosovo nor Iraq on my deployments. But I do have to call bunk on this video. Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:21:55 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026856.php#IDComment26560167 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026848.php#IDComment26488481 I still don't understand how Islam is a race. Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:33:36 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026848.php#IDComment26488481 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026781.php#IDComment25968672 Why is this man not being executed like the pig he is? Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:52:40 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026781.php#IDComment25968672 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026754.php#IDComment25616339 Awesome. Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:08:46 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026754.php#IDComment25616339 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026626.php#IDComment24618858 Well they should charge him for lying about have you had possession of all your baggage at the check in counter. Because if his friend gave him that bag he did not have possession of it at some point. Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:02:28 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026626.php#IDComment24618858 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026588.php#IDComment24314961 Nothing on this on CNN. Figures. Hopefully Germany will wake up and change their constitution and invade Yemen. Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:47:36 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026588.php#IDComment24314961 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026535.php#IDComment23923612 Per the Law of Land Warfare and the Geneva Conventions these people have no rights whatsoever if they are caught engaging in operations without being in a recognizable uniform of a national Army. That said, the Taliban is no longer a legitimate government so their 'soldiers' do not have rights either. The only thing they can expect is LEGAL execution, they are not and will never be recognized as POWs per the Geneva Conventions. Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:23:48 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026535.php#IDComment23923612 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026503.php#IDComment23715541 So when are we going to hear about this girl being killed to protect the families honour? I bet that is what happens to her next. Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:06:05 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026503.php#IDComment23715541 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026337.php#IDComment22634059 Could those agents of arrogance be Iranian? Fri, 29 May 2009 20:15:34 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026337.php#IDComment22634059 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026305.php#IDComment22495687 So where are the riots by Christians protesting this blasphemy? Oh right Christians have morals. Thu, 28 May 2009 05:43:58 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026305.php#IDComment22495687 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026306.php#IDComment22495154 '"He has no respect for the Hazara people," said Mohammad Ibrahim Sharyati, who said he lost about 2,600 books worth about $40,000.' This guy is flat out lying about his losses. $40,000 at 2,600 books is about just over $1500 a book. Typical muslim, he smells money from Americans so he lies to try and cash in. Thu, 28 May 2009 05:39:38 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026306.php#IDComment22495154 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026229.php#IDComment22072914 Do not ever turn your back to this man. All that would do is set you up for a knife in the back or a sword to the neck. File an intimidation complaint with your local police department. If he threatened you even implying a threat, the police MUST take action. Fri, 22 May 2009 21:38:09 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026229.php#IDComment22072914 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025812.php#IDComment19789182 Your ramble makes no sense. Plain english please. Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:55:40 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025812.php#IDComment19789182 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025684.php#IDComment18759760 It was not the Coast Guard. The Coast Guard is not the Navy. Two different branches with similar equipment. Unfortunately the Coast Guard is the forgotten branch. Of course from what I understand they no longer fall under the Pentagon but DHS. Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:50:42 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025684.php#IDComment18759760