<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/285565</link>
		<description>Comments by Modern_Girl</description>
<item>
<title>The Atheist Blogger : Scale of Belief, Knowledge, &amp; Certainty</title>
<link>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/12/23/scale-of-belief-knowledge-certainty/#IDComment13183218</link>
<description>Just to be different, I&amp;#039;ll announce that I&amp;#039;m a 3. :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://atheistblogger.com/2008/12/23/scale-of-belief-knowledge-certainty/#IDComment13183218</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Debunking Atheists : Psychological Questionnaire</title>
<link>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12808789</link>
<description>I get that everyone thinks the test is New Agey, astrological-like. But it seriously isn&amp;#039;t. Though, I was a bit confused as to how the test fit with the objective of the blog. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12808789</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Debunking Atheists : Psychological Questionnaire</title>
<link>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12800808</link>
<description>I suggested this comment system, so my cognitive dissonance is making me like it. Sure, the formatting leaves something to be desired, but I greatly enjoy how replies will appear directly below the comment their replying to. That&amp;#039;s for trying out my suggestion Dan!  Dave, you sound like a psychometrist&amp;#039;s nightmare. Most psychological measures have a forced choice design. The strategy is that your response to one answer won&amp;#039;t make or break you, but there&amp;#039;s a variety of &amp;quot;factors&amp;quot; embedded in each measure. You might get asked about the same factor 3 or 4 times. If you answer in the same way all 4 times, that put you strongly in that directly. If you answer one way twice and the opposite way twice, it shows you&amp;#039;re neutral on that factor. Tests like this have been shown to have strong construct validity (meaning they can accurately predict what they&amp;#039;re trying to) and strong reliability if things like lying detecting and social desirability are controlled for. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12800808</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Debunking Atheists : Psychological Questionnaire</title>
<link>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12794883</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s Mine:  INFJ  Introverted Intuitive Feeling Judging   It says I&amp;#039;m an idealist Counsellor and I&amp;#039;m well suited for work in psychology, counselling,  religious education, writing, or web design.  Considering I&amp;#039;m a PhD student in psychology who spends my leisure time on religious blogs...I&amp;#039;d stay the write ups are fairly well done.  I&amp;#039;ve done this test oodles of times. It&amp;#039;s a psychology trademark. It does have some scientific grounding and isn&amp;#039;t like horoscope. Though, this version had a few typos and html glitches that I picked up.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://debunkingatheists.blogspot.com/2008/12/psychological-questionnaire.html#IDComment12794883</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>