<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1319528</link>
		<description>Comments by MisterAmerica</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Overturns California Gay Marriage Ban</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90903178</link>
<description>Hold on do you live in the Kentucky Hills? Where I live, marriage is between 2 consenting adults ...  As long as civil unions carries with it the same rights, then what&amp;#039;s the difference? If there is a difference and civil unions are set up to deny rights, then there&amp;#039;s a problem ...  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90903178</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Overturns California Gay Marriage Ban</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90898015</link>
<description>Agreed. Propositions are a crock. We were never supposed to have a direct democracy. The Framers could have made this a direct democracy but they knew that political system creates multiple problems.   But .... some people want a direct democracy anyway. It&amp;#039;s a mess AND a crock.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 00:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90898015</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Overturns California Gay Marriage Ban</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90897288</link>
<description>Very good question ... I will tell my kids that this is a Republic and not a direct democracy. Private citizens in our Republic are not supposed to make laws. Us private citizens do not always know when sometimes what we want is against the law. This is why we vote for lawmakers. Our lawmakers then are supposed to make the law.   Tell them that Propositions are a crock.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 00:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90897288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Overturns California Gay Marriage Ban</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90891116</link>
<description>You know how it is ... Conservatives want to know and want to approve of what goes on in people&amp;#039;s bedrooms. They care about other people&amp;#039;s personal lives and if they do not have a good idea of what&amp;#039;s going on in those bedrooms, or do not approve, they will hire someone like Ken Starr to dig up the details and uncover all of the stained blue dresses.   I don&amp;#039;t see much use in it. Some Cons get board I guess. Some other Cons I truly believe really get off on that kinda stuff.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 00:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90891116</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Judge Overturns California Gay Marriage Ban</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90889940</link>
<description>Redefine marriage? What do you right wingers not understand about what 2 committed adults want??   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/judge-overturns-california-gay-marriage-ban/#IDComment90889940</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : AP: Black Members of Tea Party Dispute Racist Claims</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/ap-black-members-of-tea-party-dispute-racist-claims/#IDComment90889109</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure what the Black Conservatives said here ... Did they say that the Tea Party should have simply &amp;#039;refudiated&amp;#039; the racism allegation. Or did yet another Conservative group avoid the issue of Tea Party racism and issue more guilt-filled attacks on the NAACP?   And does this mean the &amp;quot;colorblind society&amp;quot; promoted by Black Conservatives, takes a seat beside WMDs in Iraq as just another Conservative fabrication?    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2010 00:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/08/04/ap-black-members-of-tea-party-dispute-racist-claims/#IDComment90889109</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Afghan politicians rally around Gen. McChrystal</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81805449</link>
<description>You are talking about the Iraq fiasco under Bush right? Or do you mean the Afghanistan fiasco under Bush. Vietnam under Nixon?   The numbers don&amp;#039;t lie. More deaths during Republican Administrations.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81805449</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Afghan politicians rally around Gen. McChrystal</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81792317</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m old fashion and remember when disrespect for your superiors was met with swift punishment ..... especially in the military.   Funny how conservatives these days are soft on discipline and us Liberals hold the torch for what&amp;#039;s left of respect, common courtesy, and discipline in this great country.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81792317</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Afghan politicians rally around Gen. McChrystal</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81791959</link>
<description>Well, my latest trip abroad was 2 weeks ago, and I have to say, he is still loved abroad.   One thing those abroad always like about us is our liberalism not our conservatism. They like the fact that we really know how to &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; (they link change to freedom) and are not stuck on the status quo.   Another thing ...professional armies must show deference and respect to civilian commanders.... even if the name of the civilian leader is Faulteroy. What it sounds like conservatives want is the US military to be unprofessional ... more like Columbia&amp;#039;s.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 21:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGGAK01&show_article=1#IDComment81791959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81767128</link>
<description>I can still remember a time when disrespect of your superiors was always met with swift punishment. Now we make excuses for those who do not listen to their superiors.   Sorry state we&amp;#039;re in ... I hope it&amp;#039;s just Conservatives that excuse bad behavior and not all of America.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81767128</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81766438</link>
<description>McChrystal was looking for a way out. To AGAIN make comments like this in public, after General Petraeus talked to him about this before, means McChrystal has an psychological issue, can&amp;#039;t deal with authority, or he just couldn&amp;#039;t handle the heat.   Heat? He was asked to change the post-Vietnam approach to wars and conduct war on a schedule. That&amp;#039;s hard for an ole dog.   I&amp;#039;m glad Obama has put wars on a leash and sent a message to the corrupt foreign politicians that their days of sucking the US Treasury dry are numbered. McChrystal couldn&amp;#039;t help with that effort. He needed to go.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81766438</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81763863</link>
<description>Yeah ... Bush was an intellect. That Obama guy .... How can anyone say that kind of person has an intellect. You know what I mean?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81763863</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81763485</link>
<description>Protecting the troops includes our military leaders following the chain of command and listening to their superiors, does it not? McChrystal did not listen to General Petraus when he was talked to before about other remarks. It&amp;#039;s not just Obama McChrystal has a problem with ... And you want someone like THAT leading our troops?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81763485</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762606</link>
<description>Not always ... Showing respect comes with certain jobs. McChrystal had one of those jobs.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762606</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762283</link>
<description>Oh yeah ... more disrespect for, this time, private conversations. Conservatives never cease to amaze me with their lack of common courtesy, common decency and just plain respect.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762283</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762042</link>
<description>McChryrstal has a problem. He&amp;#039;s done this before and was reprimanded by his superiors. So it&amp;#039;s not just Obama he shows disrespect for. But also other Generals .. his commanding officers.   Of course that doesn&amp;#039;t matter to some ... repeated bad behavior and going against your superiors ... Those who coddle that would rather attack Obama. Some things never change. But I hope some of Obama&amp;#039;s critics would remember what it was like when we all used to believe in common courtesy and respecting your superiors.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81762042</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81758717</link>
<description>LOL ... High Times ... McChrystal was looking for a way out. He couldn&amp;#039;t handle the heat. After all he was asked to work on deadlines which meant fewer gold vacations and a real focus on the job.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81758717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81757574</link>
<description>Yeah ... we should not have the military lead by anyone in a suit. Military should be lead by ... well, how do they do it in Columbia anyway? Salute the empty uniform! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81757574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81757201</link>
<description>Disrespect only matters to us who believe in old ideas like decency and common courtesy. But after the whole Ken Starr public investigation of Clinton&amp;#039;s sex life, all sense of decency took a big hit. After that, common courtesy, and decency has been missing in many public officials.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81757201</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Can&#039;t Fire McCrystal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81751638</link>
<description>Well, protocol, decorum, courtesy are the glue of this other thing called civil society. If we don&amp;#039;t have people holding their tongues in civil society, we would have neither civility nor society.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbabbin/2010/06/22/obama-cant-fire-mccrystal/#IDComment81751638</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>