<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1515171</link>
		<description>Comments by Mingus968</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Breitbart to &lt;i&gt;Newsweek&lt;/i&gt;: ‘I’d Like To Speak with Sherrod in Private’</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/30/breitbart-to-newsweek-id-like-to-speak-with-sherrod-in-private/#IDComment90083244</link>
<description>The smoking gun re Breitbart&amp;#039;s attack on Sherrod is here, you chumps: &amp;quot;Well, yes. But I put up what I had. It granted a great portion of her redemptive tale, but not all of it. If I could do it all over again, I should have waited for the full video to get to me.&amp;quot;  So he sat on the tape for four months without verifying and without seeking Ms Sherrod&amp;#039;s comment?  Why?  You call call this journalism?  This site should be seen for what it is - propaganda.  It should be renamed &amp;quot;NO JOURNALISM&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/07/30/breitbart-to-newsweek-id-like-to-speak-with-sherrod-in-private/#IDComment90083244</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>