<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/534688</link>
		<description>Comments by Mike_Phillips</description>
<item>
<title>Think Vitamin : How Should Companies Approach Twitter?</title>
<link>http://thinkvitamin.com/business/how-should-companies-approach-twitter/#IDComment21236613</link>
<description>I think it is important to have both, afterall, the question when a person leaves a company is who owns the followers? If the person running a company&amp;#039;s only twitter page moves to a new company, would they take the followers? If it is their twitter page then they are more than allowed to. If it is an @companyname then obviously not.   I also wouldn&amp;#039;t want one person to have so much power, effectively speaking for the company unless it was the person at the top. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thinkvitamin.com/business/how-should-companies-approach-twitter/#IDComment21236613</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>