<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/680565</link>
		<description>Comments by MikeLew</description>
<item>
<title>Buckeye Commentary : Big Ten should innovate with expansion</title>
<link>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/03/big-ten-should-innovate-with-expansion/#IDComment61442883</link>
<description>I agree that they&amp;#039;ll gain more in TV revenue with the 3 &amp;quot;mega weekends&amp;quot;,   I&amp;#039;m just not sure that counterbalances the losses from losing the CCG, what with the sponsors, tickets, concessions, parking, etc.  The estimates of that value are in the $12-15 million-a-year range, and I just don&amp;#039;t think that the increased television contracts will make up that difference, especially since ABC/ESPN would already get at least 4, and more often 5/6, of those 6 games every year.  I also agree in that I don&amp;#039;t want OSU-UM to be reduced in importance, and I&amp;#039;m all for new ideas.   All in all, I&amp;#039;d love to see your idea implemented, I just don&amp;#039;t think it&amp;#039;ll happen.  I didn&amp;#039;t mean for my earlier comment to come across as overly negative- I&amp;#039;ve been told that sometimes that happens with my writing style.  Unfortunately, I haven&amp;#039;t come up with a way to add a team, keep The Game once a year, every year, and allow for it to still have the potential to decide the conference championship.  It&amp;#039;s certainly a tough problem.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/03/big-ten-should-innovate-with-expansion/#IDComment61442883</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Buckeye Commentary : Big Ten should innovate with expansion</title>
<link>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/03/big-ten-should-innovate-with-expansion/#IDComment60282370</link>
<description>The big problem with this is $$.  Adding a team to the conference only really benefits the whole conference monetarily if it increases everyone&amp;#039;s revenue, and the only way that happens is with the estimated $15 million the Big Ten gets for staging a conference championship game.  If that doesn&amp;#039;t happen, bringing in Texas isn&amp;#039;t going to add enough money to the pool to offset the addition of another team sharing the money. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Mar 2010 02:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/03/big-ten-should-innovate-with-expansion/#IDComment60282370</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Buckeye Commentary : Oh The Weather Outside Is...</title>
<link>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/10/oh-the-weather-outside-is/#IDComment37792807</link>
<description>Cassius-  The Big Ten has a new rule outlawing night games in November, which means that OSU-PSU won&amp;#039;t be played at 8PM....it will probably be the ABC 3:30 game that day, though. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Oct 2009 06:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.buckeyecommentary.com/10/oh-the-weather-outside-is/#IDComment37792807</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>