<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/501674</link>
		<description>Comments by Metskins</description>
<item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pepsi Refresh Pre-Game: Mets vs Brewers - Game Three</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/19/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-brewers-game-three/#IDComment19375886</link>
<description>This is what happens when you basically bring back the same lineup from last year.  A lineup, that while decent statistically showed little knack for getting hits when it counted.  I&amp;#039;m not saying Manny should have been signed, but there were moves out there that would have changed the makeup of the lineup and maybe even challenge some these guys.  I brought this up in the offseason and I remember being told to shut up because the offense was like 3rd in runs or something.  My reply was, how many runs did they score in September?  I don&amp;#039;t remember hearing anything after that. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/19/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-brewers-game-three/#IDComment19375886</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19147020</link>
<description>I think that having a memorial to Jackie is fine, the Orioles have a statue of Babe Ruth at Camden Yards because he grew up right across the street.  However, I kind of think that making it the centerpiece of the park could be a little short sighted.  It&amp;#039;s almost like they&amp;#039;re trying too hard to memorialize the man-which in this day and age can be construed by some as contrived and politically correct. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19147020</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19144174</link>
<description>These are all great ideas.  Not new ones mind you, but still great. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19144174</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19143118</link>
<description>I like the new system.  It&amp;#039;s much cleaner than the old one and loads a lot quicker. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19143118</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19142880</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t have a problem getting called out for what I say.   I just wanted to know what he took such umbrage with.  Truthfully, I didn&amp;#039;t expect the Mike Nichols jihad to take much issue with how I characterized his statement.   I figured at the most someone would defend his statement (they didn&amp;#039;t) and that it might produce real discussion.  Instead it devolved into a whiny &amp;quot;don&amp;#039;t call him that&amp;quot; back and forth.  I&amp;#039;ll definitely watch how I characterize things in the future, because truthfully I don&amp;#039;t come here to snipe at folks, I come here to talk about the Mets......who right now I find really really lousy. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19142880</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19141175</link>
<description>Yeah.  I found it idiotic and I gave reasons why.  Why else do I need to justify it?  I&amp;#039;m sorry, is Mike Nichols an untouchable deity on this blog?  I mean I didn&amp;#039;t call him an idiot, I called his comment idiotic.  I happen to like his work for the most part but I took issue with that statement.  That&amp;#039;s what happens on here, people make comments and then other people make comments based on what they read .  Welcome to the world of blogging.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19141175</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19140483</link>
<description>Brilliant statement...  Care to expound or do you just deliver one liners? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19140483</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19137787</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not talking about Matt, I&amp;#039;m talking about Mike Nichols&amp;#039; statement about how it doesn&amp;#039;t bother him that Citi isn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;Met-centric&amp;quot; enough.  I found it ridiculous, and I was expressing MY OPINION.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19137787</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Read: Five Facts, Five Thoughts</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19135220</link>
<description>Mike, your comment about not being concerned because there isn&amp;#039;t enough Mets stuff at Citi is completely idiotic.  When you move into a new home, don&amp;#039;t you put up old pictures?  Or do you just keep the walls clear until you take new ones?  Under your logic, they shouldn&amp;#039;t have brought over anything commemorating the past World Series victories since they didn&amp;#039;t happen at Citi and we&amp;#039;re only focused on &amp;quot;creating new memories&amp;quot;.  C&amp;#039;mon man.  When this team is 20 games under .500 (hypothetically speaking of course), people are going to want to remember the good times.  I haven&amp;#039;t been to the new stadium and quite honestly I think some of these complaints are just people piling on, but I don&amp;#039;t think it&amp;#039;s unfair for people to want more of a connection to the past of their favorite team. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/17/five-facts-five-thoughts/#IDComment19135220</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pepsi Refresh Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game Three</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19053622</link>
<description>They shouldn&amp;#039;t need to rely on a manager.  There should be somebody in the clubhouse that would do that.  Maybe it&amp;#039;ll be Sheffield.  Who knows?  It won&amp;#039;t be David Wright, that&amp;#039;s for sure. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19053622</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pepsi Refresh Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game Three</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19053216</link>
<description>The Pepsi Pregame?  I can&amp;#039;t even tell you how lame that is.... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19053216</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pepsi Refresh Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game Three</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19047988</link>
<description>Julie Alexandria is the best thing about this year. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/pepsi-refresh-pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-three/#IDComment19047988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Health: Pelfrey&#039;s Forearm, Now What?</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/health-pelfreys-forearm-now-what/#IDComment18851079</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re an effing tool. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/health-pelfreys-forearm-now-what/#IDComment18851079</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Health: Pelfrey&#039;s Forearm, Now What?</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/health-pelfreys-forearm-now-what/#IDComment18849834</link>
<description>Tom Verducci is a soothsayer. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/16/health-pelfreys-forearm-now-what/#IDComment18849834</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Buzz: Deadline Deals, Hudson wanted NYC</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/buzz-deadline-deals-hudson-wanted-nyc/#IDComment18757558</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s seven games people.  Chill out!  Two games were pretty much lost by errors.  There are issues but I&amp;#039;d like to see Pelfrey pitch once in something more than 40 degree weather before I make any judgments.. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/buzz-deadline-deals-hudson-wanted-nyc/#IDComment18757558</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Quote: It&#039;s Great Talking to a Pope</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/quote-its-great-talking-to-a-pope/#IDComment18738201</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been listening to Mike for the better part of a week for the first time ever.  I don&amp;#039;t find him to be nearly as MET HATER CENTRIC as some say on here. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/14/quote-its-great-talking-to-a-pope/#IDComment18738201</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game One</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18702840</link>
<description>Could someone tell Bobby Ojeda that there are no POINTS in baseball!!!  There are only runs!  If a chick said that, we&amp;#039;d rip her and rightly so.  Why is a major league starter who for the most part seems to offer good analysis, using the word POINTS?? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18702840</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game One</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18700624</link>
<description>I hate Eckstein.  He just continues to hang in there  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18700624</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game One</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18700133</link>
<description>Dear Wilpons, thank you for making it virtually impossible to hit a ball out of Citi in center field.  You&amp;#039;re awesome. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18700133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>MetsBlog.com : Pre-Game: Mets vs. Padres - Game One</title>
<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18699120</link>
<description>Why is Beltran still on first? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/04/13/pre-game-mets-vs-padres-game-one/#IDComment18699120</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>